Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:41:00.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nutrient stimulation of carbon fixation in summertime English Channel phytoplankton assemblages

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Anthony G. Davies  and
Jillian A. Sleep
Anthony G. Davies
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Jillian A. Sleep
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The effects of nutrient additions and zooplankton excretion products upon carbon fixation rates in the phytoplankton present at Station L 4 in the English Channel during the summer and autumn of 1979 have been studied. Nitrate, ammonium, urea, phosphate, glucose-6-phosphate and the excretion products when added individually all caused photosynthesis to be stimulated, and the result of the simultaneous addition of nitrate and phosphate indicated that their effects were additive. Germanic acid, which inhibits photosynthesis mainly in diatoms, removed the stimulatory effect of the nitrogen supplements, indicating that they were utilized mostly by the diatoms; the higher fixation rates caused by the phosphate enrichments were, however, decreased by the same proportion as the unenriched controls when germanic acid was present, suggesting that the whole of the phytoplankton population was phosphorus-limited. This was supported by the finding that glucose-6-phosphate stimulated carbon fixation in all of the phytoplankton.

The excretion products, even at concentrations likely to be produced in the sea, stimulated carbon fixation, and it has been calculated that zooplankton-regenerated nitrogen and phosphorus compounds could supply the amounts needed to maintain primary production during the summer period.

Nutrient additions and zooplankton excretion products had little effect upon carbon fixation in the autumn samples, presumably because the higher nutrient levels then present in the water exceeded the requirements of the phytoplankton.

It has been concluded that the predominance of the sub-10 μ microflagellates in the summertime is probably due to their ability to utilize more efficiently than the other types of phytoplankton the low levels of nutrients which become available due to regeneration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 61 , Issue 3 , August 1981 , pp. 551 - 563
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Butler, E. I., Knox, S. & Liddicoat, M. I., 1979. The relationship between inorganic and organic nutrients in sea water. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corner, E. D. S., Head, R. N. & Kilvington, C. C, 1972. On the nutrition and metabolism of zooplankton. VIII. The grazing of Biddulphia cells by Calanus helgolandicus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 847–861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G. & Sleep, J. A., 1979. Inhibition of carbon fixation as a function of zinc uptake in natural phytoplankton assemblages. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 59, 937–949.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G. & Sleep, J. A., 1980. Copper inhibition of carbon fixation in coastal phytoplankton assemblages. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 841–850.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. G., Sleep, J. A. & Harbour, D. S., 1982. Germanic acid inhibition of carbon fixation in natural phytoplankton assemblages. Limnology and Oceanography. (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eppley, R. W., Rogers, J. N. & Mccarthy, J. J., 1969. Half-saturation constants for uptake of nitrate and ammonium by marine phytoplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 14, 912–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friebele, E. S., Correll, D. L. & Faust, M. A., 1978. Relationship between phytoplankton cell size and the rate of orthophosphate uptake:in situ observations of an estuarine population. Marine Biology, 45, 39–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, W. G., Azam, F., Renger, E. H. & Eppley, R. W., 1977. Some experiments on phosphate assimilation by coastal marine plankton. Marine Biology, 40, 9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendey, N. I., 1974. A revised check-list of British marine diatoms. Journal of the Marine Bio-logical Association of the United Kingdom, 54, 277–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holligan, P. M. & Harbour, D. S., 1977. The vertical distribution and succession of phyto-plankton in the western English Channel in 1975 and 1976. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannes, R. E., 1964. Phosphorus excretion and body size in marine animals: microzooplankton and nutrient regeneration. Science, New York, 146, 923–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, P. W. & Sieburth, J. McN., 1979. Chroococcoid cynaobacteria in the sea: a ubiquitous and diverse phototrophic biomass. Limnology and Oceanography, 24, 928–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, T. C, 1971. The relative importance of nanoplankton and netplankton as primary producers in the Californian Current system. Fishery Bulletin. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States, 69, 799–820.Google Scholar
Mgller, M., Myklestad, S. & Haug, A., 1975. Alkaline and acid phosphatases of the marine diatoms Chaetoceros affinis var. willei (Gran) Hustedt and Skeletonema costatum (Grev.) Cleve. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 19, 217–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parke, M. & Dixon, P. S., 1976. Check-list of British marine algae – third revision. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 56, 527–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. J., 1972. Alkaline phosphatase activity in subtropical central Pacific waters using a sensitive fluorometric method. Marine Biology, 15, 113–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, M. J., 1976. Phosphate utilization by an oceanic diatom in phosphorus-limited chemostat culture and in the oligotrophic waters of the central North Pacific. Limnology and Oceanography, 21, 88–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomeroy, L. R., Matthews, H. M. & Min, Hong Shik, 1963. Excretion of phosphate and soluble organic phosphorus compounds by zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 8, 50–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhee, G-Y., 1973. A continuous culture study of phosphate uptake, growth rate and polyphosphate in Scenedesmus sp. Journal of Phycology, 9, 495–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subba, Rao D. V., 1980. Measurement of primary production in phytoplankton groups by sizefractionation and by germanic acid inhibition techniques. Oceanologica acta, 3, 31–42.Google Scholar
Taft, J. L., Loftus, M. E. & Taylor, W. R., 1977. Phosphate uptake from phosphomonoesters by phytoplankton in Chesapeake Bay. Limnology and Oceanography, 22, 1012–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. H. & Dodson, A. N., 1974. Inhibition of diatom photosynthesis by germanic acid: separation of diatom productivity from total marine primary productivity. Marine Biology, 27, 11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. H., Dodson, A. N. & Reid, F. M. H., 1978. Diatom productivity compared to other algae in natural marine phytoplankton assemblages. Journal of Phycology, 14, 250–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, W. H., Renger, E. H. & Dodson, A. N., 1971. Near-surface organic nitrogen in the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Research, 18, 65–71.Google Scholar
Venrick, E. L., Beers, J. R. & Heinbokel, J. F., 1977. Possible consequences of containing microplankton for physiological rate measurements. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 26, 55–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vince, S. & Valiela, I., 1973. The effects of ammonium and phosphate enrichments on chlorophyll a pigment ratio and species composition of phytoplankton of Vineyard Sound. Marine Biology, 19, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar