Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T13:33:16.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shells of Patella aspera as ‘islands’ for epibionts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2014

Gustavo M. Martins ,
João Faria ,
Miguel Furtado  and
Ana I. Neto
Gustavo M. Martins*
Affiliation:
CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal Centre for Research in Natural Resources, Department of Biology, University of Azores, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, S. Miguel, Açores, Portugal
João Faria
Affiliation:
CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal Centre for Research in Natural Resources, Department of Biology, University of Azores, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, S. Miguel, Açores, Portugal
Miguel Furtado
Affiliation:
Centre for Research in Natural Resources, Department of Biology, University of Azores, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, S. Miguel, Açores, Portugal Faculty of Sciences, University of Lisbon, Campo Grande 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Ana I. Neto
Affiliation:
CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal Centre for Research in Natural Resources, Department of Biology, University of Azores, 9501-801 Ponta Delgada, S. Miguel, Açores, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: G.M. Martins, CIIMAR/CIMAR, Interdisciplinary Centre for Marine and Environmental Research, University of Porto, Rua dos Bragas 289, 4050-123 Porto, Portugal email: gmartins@uac.pt
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study we examined the epibiont assemblage on shells of the living limpet Patella aspera. Limpets were collected at two sites at each of the nine islands of the Azores, totalling 707 individuals examined. Shells were measured and all the epibiota identified to the lowest taxonomic resolution possible. 190 taxa were recorded, of which 97% were algae, including 17 new records for the Azores. Only five shells were devoid of fouling organisms. The assemblage was dominated by a few algal taxa, whereas the majority of species occurred on less than 10% of the shells. A significant and positive relationship was generally found between basibiont size (shell length) and epibiota richness. The strength (slope) of the relationship, however, varied between islands and sites. These results suggest that a range of processes operating at multiple spatial scales influenced epibiont assemblages. Many features identified in these assemblages resemble, in many ways, those examined in island biogeography, suggesting that basibionts may be considered as ‘islands’ and may provide a suitable model system to test ecological hypotheses about ecosystems that are not so amenable to experimentation.

Keywords

epibiosislimpetsspecies richnessspatial scalesAzores
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 94 , Issue 5 , August 2014 , pp. 1027 - 1032
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Addis, P., Secci, M., Brundu, G., Manunza, A., Corrias, S. and Cau, A. (2009) Density, size structure, shell orientation and epibiontic colonization of the fan mussel Pinna nobilis (Mollusca: Bivalvia) in their contrasting habitats in an estuarine area of Sardinia (W Mediterranean). Scientia Marina 73, 143–152.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 32–46.Google Scholar
Anderson, M.J. (2005) PERMANOVA: permutational multivariate analysis of variance. Auckland: Department of Statistics, University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Connor, E.F. and McCoy, E.D. (1979) Statistics and biology of the species–area relationship. American Naturalist 113, 791–833.Google Scholar
Creed, J.C. (2000) Epibiosis on cerith shells in a seagrass bed: correlation of shell occupant with epizoite distribution and abundance. Marine Biology 137, 775–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Enderlein, P., Moorthi, S., Rohrscheidt, H. and Wahl, M. (2003) Optimal foraging versus shared doom effects: interactive influence of mussel size and epibiosis on predator preference. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 292, 231–242.Google Scholar
Fralick, R.A., Hehre, E.J. and Mathieson, A.C. (1985) Observations on the marine algal flora of the Azores I: notes on the epizoic algae occurring on the marine molluscs Patella spp. Arquipélago VI, 39–43.Google Scholar
Fraschetti, S., Terlizzi, A. and Benedetti-Cecchi, L. (2005) Patterns of distribution of marine assemblages from rocky shores: evidence of relevant spatial scales. Marine Ecology Progress Series 296, 13–29.Google Scholar
Guiry, M.D. and Guiry, G.M. (2013) AlgaeBase. Galway: University of Ireland, World-wide electronic publication. Available at: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed 13 March 2014).Google Scholar
Harder, T. (2008) Marine epibiosis: concepts, ecological consequences and host defence. In Flemming, H.C., Murthy, P.S., Venkatesan, R. and Cooksey, K. (eds) Marine and industrial biofouling. Berlin: Springer, pp. 219–231.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J., Côrte-Real, H.B.S.M., Pannacciulli, F.G., Weber, L.C. and Biship, J.D.D. (2000) Thoughts on the ecology and evolution of the intertidal biota of the Azores and other Atlantic islands. Hydrobiologia 440, 3–17.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J. and Hartnoll, R.G. (1983) Grazing of intertidal algae by marine invertebrates. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 21, 195–282.Google Scholar
Hawkins, S.J., Southward, A.J. and Genner, M.J. (2003) Detection of environmental change in a marine ecosystem—evidence from the western English Channel. Science of the Total Environment 310, 245–256.Google Scholar
Jenkins, S.R., Moore, P., Burrows, M.T., Garbat, D.J., Hawkins, S.J., Ingolfsson, A., Sebens, K.P., Snelgrove, P.V.R., Wethey, D.S. and Woodin, S.A. (2008) Comparative ecology of North Atlantic shores: do differences in players matter for process? Ecology 89, S3–S23.Google Scholar
Laudien, J. and Wahl, M. (1999) Indirect effects of epibiosis on host mortality: Seastar predation on differently fouled mussels. Marine Ecology 20, 35–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, M.V. (2000) Ecology's most general, yet protean pattern: the species–area relationship. Journal of Biogeography 27, 17–26.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. and Wilson, E.O. (1963) An equilibrium theory of insular zoogeography. Evolution 17, 373–387.Google Scholar
Martins, G.M., Jenkins, S.R., Hawkins, S.J., Neto, A.I. and Thompson, R.C. (2008a) Exploitation of rocky intertidal grazers: population status and potential impacts on community structure and functioning. Aquatic Biology 3, 1–10.Google Scholar
Martins, G.M., Thompson, R.C., Hawkins, S.J., Neto, A.I. and Jenkins, S.R. (2008b) Rocky intertidal community structure in oceanic islands: scales of spatial variability. Marine Ecology Progress Series 356, 15–24.Google Scholar
Martins, G.M., Thompson, R.C., Neto, A.I., Hawkins, S.J. and Jenkins, S.R. (2010) Exploitation of intertidal grazers as a driver of community divergence. Journal of Applied Ecology 47, 1282–1289.Google Scholar
Martins, G.M., Jenkins, S.R., Hawkins, S.J., Neto, A.I. and Thompson, R.C. (2011) Illegal harvesting affects the success of fishing closure areas. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 91, 929–937.Google Scholar
McGuinness, K.A. (1984) Equations and explanations in the study of species area curves. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 59, 423–440.Google Scholar
Morton, B. (1988) Partnerships in the sea: Hong Kong's marine symbioses. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.Google Scholar
Munguia, P. and Miller, T.E. (2008) Habitat destruction and metacommunity size in marine systems. Journal of Animal Ecology 77, 1175–1182.Google Scholar
Navarro, P.G., Ramírez, R., Tuya, F., Fernandez-Gil, C., Sanchez-Jerez, P. and Haroun, R.J. (2005) Hierarchical analysis of spatial distribution patterns of patellid limpets in the Canary Islands. Journal of Molluscan Studies 71, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, A.L., Low, P.J., Ellis, J.R. and Reynolds, J.D. (2005) Climate change and distribution shifts in marine fishes. Science 308, 1912–1915.Google Scholar
Silva, A.C.F. (2008) Predation by crabs on rocky shores in north-east Atlantic. PhD thesis. University of Plymouth, UK.Google Scholar
Silva, A.C.F., Hawkins, S.J., Boaventura, D.M. and Thompson, R.C. (2008) Predation by small aquatic predators regulates populations of the intertidal limpet Patella vulgata (L.). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 367, 259–265.Google Scholar
Wahl, M. (1989) Marine epibiosis. I. Fouling and antifouling: some basic aspects. Marine Ecology Progress Series 58, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wahl, M. (2010) Epibiosis. In Dürr, S. and Thomasson, J.C. (eds) Biofouling. Oxford: Wiley–Blackwell, pp. 100–108.Google Scholar
Wahl, M., Hay, M.E. and Enderlein, P. (1997) Effects of epibiosis on consumer–prey interactions. Hydrobiologia 355, 49–59.Google Scholar
Wahl, M. and Mark, O. (1999) The predominantly facultative nature of epibiosis: experimental and observational evidence. Marine Ecology Progress Series 187, 59–66.Google Scholar
Wahl, M. and Sönnichsen, H. (1992) Marine epibiosis. IV. The periwinkle Littorina littorea lacks typical antifouling defences—why are some populations so little fouled? Marine Ecology Progress Series 88, 225–235.Google Scholar
Wernberg, T., Tuya, F. and Thomsen, M. (2010) Turban snails as habitat for foliose algae: contrasting geographical patterns in species richness. Marine and Freshwater Research 61, 1237–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittaker, R.J., Triantis, K.A. and Ladle, R.J. (2008) A general dynamic theory of oceanic island biogeography. Journal of Biogeography 35, 977–994.Google Scholar