Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T23:01:34.395Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Species of Lebetus [Teleostei: Gobiidae]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

P. J. Miller
P. J. Miller
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, University of Bristol
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The north-eastern Atlantic gobiid genus Lebetus Winther, 1877, was formerly believed to contain two species, Lebetus scorpioides (Collett, 1874) and L. orca (Collett, 1874). These have been subsequently shown to represent females (and immature fish) and males respectively of a single, sexually dimorphic species whose valid name is L. scorpioides. The discovery of two forms of Lebetus postlarvae, differing in meristic characters, fin growth, and pigmentation, is shown not to affect this conclusion but to suggest provisional recognition of another species, L. guilleti (Le Danois, 1913), with fewer anal fin-rays (A I/5–6) and vertebrae (25–26) than L. scorpioides (A I/7–8; vertebrae 27-29). A key and limited synonymy for the species is provided. As a possible alternative view it is suggested that relatively high summer sea-temperatures during early development of L. scorpioides in certain areas may produce the lower meristic features of L. guilleti.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 1971 , pp. 771 - 776
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barlow, G. W. 1961. Causes and significance of morphological variation in fishes. Syst. Zool, Vol. 10, pp. 105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, E. K. 1964. Lebetus scorpioides (Collett, 1874). A correction of data. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Fork., Bd. 37, Nr. 2, pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
Collett, R. 1874. On two apparently new species of Gobius from Norway. Ann. Mag. nat. Hist., Ser. 4, Vol. 13, pp. 446–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collett, R. 1885. Meddelelser om Norges Fiske i aarene 1879–83.Nyt. Mag. Naturvid., Vol. 29, pp. 47–123.Google Scholar
Demir, N. & Russell, F. S. 1971. On the postlarva of the goby Lebetus. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 51, pp. 669–78.Google Scholar
Fonds, M. 1970. Remarks on the rearing of gobies (Pomatoschistus minutus and P. lozanoi) for experimental purposes. Helgoldnder wiss. Meeresunters., Vol. 20, pp. 602–8.Google Scholar
Garside, E. T. 1970. Temperature: Animals: Fishes: Structural responses. In Marine Ecology (ed. O. Kinne), Vol. 1, Part 1, pp. 561–73.Google Scholar
Gray, P. 1967. The Dictionary of the Biological Sciences. 602 pp. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Holt, E. W. L. & Byrne, L. W. 1903. The British and Irish gobies. Rep. Sea inl. Fish. Ire., 1901, Part 2, pp. 37–.66.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S. 1949. Faunistic notes. Rep. mar. biol. Stn Port Erin, No. 61, pp. 27–8.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S. 1950. Records of the Offshore Fauna of the South of the Isle of Man. MS, Port Erin Marine Biological Station Library.Google Scholar
Jones, N. S. 1951. The bottom fauna off the south of the Isle of Man. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 132–44.Google Scholar
Le Danois, E. 1910. Sur la faune ichthyologique du maerl. Bull. Soc. zool. Fr., T. 35, pp. 167–71.Google Scholar
Le Danois, E. 1913. Contribution a l'etude systematique et biologique des poissons de la Manche Occidentale. Annls Inst. oceanogr. Monaco, Vol. 5, Fasc. 5, 214 pp.Google Scholar
Le Danois, E. 1948. Les Profondeurs de la Mer. 191 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
Lönnberg, E. & Gustafson, G. 1935. Fran Kristinebergs zoologiska station sommaren 1935. Fauna Flora, Upps., pp. 241–7.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1961a. Age, growth, and reproduction of the rock goby, Gobius paganellus L., in the Isle of Man. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 41, pp. 737–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1961b. The species of the teleostean genus Lebetus. Nature, Lond., Vol. 192, pp. 675–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1963. Taxonomy and biology of the genus Lebetus (Teleostei-Gobioidea). Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist. (Ser. Zool.), Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 205–56.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1964. Gobius orca Collett, 1874 (Pisces): proposed use of the plenary powers to set aside a first reviser selection. Z.N. (S.) 1655. Bull. zool. Norn. Vol. 21, Part 5, pp. 388–91.Google Scholar
Miller, P. J. 1971. A revision of the Mediterranean gobiid genus Chromogobius (TeleosteiPerciformes). J. Zool., Vol. 164, pp. 305–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, C. G. J. 1919. Our gobies (Gobiidae). From the egg to the adult stages. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Vol. 26, pp. 47–66.Google Scholar
Smitt, F. A. 1900. Preliminary notes on the arrangement of the genus Gobius, with an enumeration of its European species. Ofvers. K. VetenskAkad. Forh., 1899, pp. 543–55.Google Scholar
Tucker, D. W. 1959. A new solution to the Atlantic eel problem. Nature, Lond., Vol. 183, PP. 495–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winther, G. 1877. Om de danske fiske af slaegten Gobius. Naturh. Tidsskr., Ser. 3, Vol. 11, pp. 41–56.Google Scholar