Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T08:24:13.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Landowner Incentives to Participate in a Purchase of Development Rights Program with Application to Maryland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Tim Phipps
Tim Phipps*
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park
Get access

Abstract

A theory-based participation model is developed using the assumptions of perfect capital markets and perfect information. Given this specification it is shown that participation in a PDR program is always equivalent in present value terms to selling the land, and is always at least as good as not participating and remaining in farming.

In order to investigate participation rates in the Maryland PDR program a less restrictive model is developed which relaxes the perfect capital markets assumption. It is found that a PDR program is most likely to be successful in regions characterized by relatively low levels of development pressure, and least likely to be successful in areas experiencing high rates of growth or areas that are not undergoing development pressure.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , Spring 1983 , pp. 61 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellows, W. J. “Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation: A Summary.” Cooperative Extension Service, University of Maryland, Leaflet 88, 1979.Google Scholar
Farmland Preservation Survey, Volume 3, No. 2, (March 1982), S. Schiff, editor.Google Scholar
Gardner, B. D. “The Economics of Agricultural Land Preservation.” Paper presented A.A.Ε.A. meetings, San Diego, 1977.Google Scholar
Kramer, R. A. and Pope, R. D. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63 (February 1981): 119–128.Google Scholar
Maryland Annotated Code, Agriculture, Title 2, Department of Agriculture, Subtitle 5, Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation, Sections 2–501 to 2–515.Google Scholar
Phipps, T. T. “The Maryland Agricultural Land Preservation Foundation.” Paper presented, Conference on Land and Resource Use, Blacksburg, Virginia, 1982.Google Scholar
Small, L. E. and Derr, D. A. “Transfer of Development Rights: A Market Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62 (February 1980): 130–135.Google Scholar
Wolfram, G. “The Sale of Development Rights and Zoning in the Preservation of Open Space: Lindahl Equilibrium and a Case Study.” Land Economics, 57 (August 1981): 398–413.Google Scholar