^{page 729 note 1} See also JRAS. 1906, pp. 484–90, 716–22; my Aitareya Āraṇyaha, p. 203.

^{page 729 note 2} ZDMG. lxv, 313–15. 3 v, 4. 52–4.

^{page 729 note 3} Sanskrit Grammar, § 1108.

^{page 729 note 4} Summarized neatly by Whitney, loc. eit., to whose account there is really nothing to add.

^{page 730 note 1} ii, 1. 13; Hi, 3. 44.

^{page 731 note 1} For the references see St. Petersburg Dictionary, s.vv.; Speyer, , Sanskrit Syntax, § 309Google Scholar.

^{page 731 note 2} xi, 5. 6. 9.

^{page 731 note 3} Sāyujya is used with much the same sense.

^{page 732 note 1} xii, 2328 (a late passage).

^{page 732 note 2} vii, 8687.

^{page 733 note 1} See the St. Petersburg Dictionaries, s. v. sātmī, and ProfessorSpeyer's, own quotations, ZDMG. lxv, 314Google Scholar.

^{page 733 note 2} Cf. also Speyer, , Vedische und Sanskrit Syntax, p. 46Google Scholar, n. 1.

^{page 733 note 3} xi, 80.

^{page 733 note 4} v, 23. 8.

^{page 733 note 5} iv, 1. 10. 3.

^{page 733 note 6} xvi, 7.

^{page 733 note 7} ii, 5. 2.

^{page 733 note 8} ii, 7. 7.

^{page 733 note 9} v, 37.

^{page 733 note 10} vi, 6. 5. 10. Eggeling, , SBE. xli, 259Google Scholar, renders “burn thou to ashes”.

^{page 733 note 11} St. Petersburg Dict. s.v. Maṣmaṣā; Bloomfield, , SBE. xlii, 455Google Scholar.

^{page 734 note 1} Cf. Wackernagel, , Altind. Gramm. i, 18Google Scholar; Macdonell, , Vedic Grammar, p. 431Google Scholar.

^{page 734 note 2} See St. Petersburg Dict. s.v.

^{page 734 note 3} Possibly the fact that the s is not liable to lingualization is to be connected with the fact that sat in sat kṛ is not liable to change as not being an ordinary suffix.