^{page 1328 note 1} Previous discussions are cited there. I have to thank Professor Macdonell for the references. MrKeith, notices them in JRAS., 1909, p. 207Google Scholar.

^{page 1328 note 2} Nirukta, ix, 3, 2–3; Sarvānukramaṇī; Sāyaṇa gives Bharmyaśva. See p. 28 ante.

^{page 1328 note 3} See note 2 above.

^{page 1329 note 1} Agni, 277, 19–22; Bhāgavata, ix, 21, 31–4, and 22, 3; Brahma, 13, 93–7; Garuḍa, i, 140, 17–20; Matsya, 50, 1–7; Vāyu (Calc. ed.), ii, 37, 189–96; (Ānandāśr. ed.), 99, 196–200; Viṣṇu, iv, 19, 15–16; and Harivaṁśa, 32, 1777–84.

^{page 1329 note 2} All confuse this name. The Bhāgav. reads Bharmyāśva and shortly Bharmya; Matsya, Bhadrāśva; Brahma, Bāhyāśva; Agni and Hariv., VāhyāŚva; and Garuḍa and Viṣṇu, Haryaśva. The Vāyu omits. The correct form is certainly Bhṛmyaśva.

^{page 1329 noet 3} So all, except the Agni and Garuḍa, which read Mukula.

^{page 1329 note 4} So all, except that the Bhāgav. reads Sañjaya and Matsya Jaya.

^{page 1329 note 5} So all, except the Garuḍa, which reads Vṛhadbhānu.

^{page 1329 note 6} So all, except that the Matsya reads Javīnara; Vāyu, Yavīyat; and Viṣṇu, Pravīra.

^{page 1329 note 7} So the Bhāgav., Vāyu (Ānand. ed.), and Viṣṇu; but the Vāyu (Calc. ed.) reads Kampilya; Garuḍa, Kampilla; Matsya, Kapila; Agni, Kṛmila; and Brahma and Hariv., Kṛmilāśva.

^{page 1329 note 8} So the Matsya and Vāyu. The Brahma and Hariv. read the patronymic Maudgalya, and the latter gives to Maudgalya a son Brahmarṣi who married Indrasenā. The Agni, Bhāgav., and Garuḍa omit.

^{page 1329 note 9} So the Brahma, Vāyu, and Hariv. The Matsya gives to Brahmiṣṭha a son named Indrasena instead, who was father of Vadhryaśva. The others omit.

^{page 1329 note 10} All confuse this name. The Hariv. reads Vadhrasva; Brahma, Vadhrya; Vāyu, Badhyaśva; Viṣṇu, Vṛddhaśva; Matsya, Vindhyāśva; and Agni, Cañcāśva. The others omit. The correct form is clearly Vadhryaśva.

^{page 1329 note 11} So the Matsya, Vāyu, and Hariv. The others omit.

^{page 1329 note 12} So all, except the Brahma, which omits.

^{page 1330 note 1} Agni, 277, 21—

Mukulasya tu Maukulyāḥ kṣetropetā dvijātayaḥ,

where read Mudgalasya, Maudgalyāḥ, and kṣatropetā.

Bhāgav., ix, 21, 33—

Mudgalād brahma-nirvṛttam gotram Maudgalya-sañjñitam.

Matsya, 50, 5–6—

Mudgalasyâpi Maudgalyāḥ kṣatropetá dvijātayaḥ

Ete hy Aṅgirasaḥ pakṣaṁ saṁśritāḥ Kāṇva-Mudgalāḥ

Mudgalasya suto jajñe Brahmiṣṭhaḥ su-mahā-yaśāḥ

Indrasenah sutas tasya Vindhyāśvas tasya câtmajah.

Vāyu (Calc. ed.), ii, 37, 193–5; (Ānandāśr. ed.), 99, 198–200—

Mudgalasyâpi Maudgalyāḥ kṣa(a)tropeta-dvijātayaḥ

Ete hy Angirasaḥ pakṣe saṁśritáḥ Kaṇṭh(v)a-Mudgalāḥ

Mudgalasya suto jyeṣṭho Brahmiṣṭhaḥ su-mahā-yaśāḥ

Indrasenā yato garbham Badhyaśvam pratyapadyata.

Viṣṇu, iv, 19, 16, in prose—

Mudgalāc ea Maudgalyāḥ kṣatropetā dvijātayo babhūvuḥ.

Hariv., 32, 1781–3—

Mudgalasya tu dāyādo Maudgalyaḥ su-mahā-yaśāḥ

Sarva ete mahâtmānaḥ kṣatropetā dvijātayaḥ

Ete hy Aṅgirasaḥ pakṣaṁ saṁśritāḥ Kāṇva-Mudgalāḥ

Maudgalyasya suto jyeṣṭho Brahmarṣiḥ su-mahā-yaśāḥ

Indrasenā yato garbhaṁ Vadhrasvam pratyapadyata.

To which may be added here the Brahma, 13, 97—

Mudgalasya tu dāyādo Maudgalyaḥ su-mahā-yaśāḥ

Indrasenā yato garbhaṁ Vadhryaṁ ca pratyapadyata.

For Vadhryaṁ ca one MS. reads Vadhvaśram.

^{page 1332 note 1} There was another Mudgala, a son (or descendant) of Viśvāmitra, , M Bh., xiii, 4, 250Google Scholar; Brahma, 10, 59; Hariv., 27, 1462 (Maudgalya, in 32, 1769)Google Scholar; unless his name is an echo of the confusion which derived the Kānyakubja dynasty from Ajamīḍha; see p. 22 ante.

^{1332 note 2} It does not necessarily follow that the vehicle was a cart because a bull was yoked to it. Chariots were sometimes drawn by other animals, as was Ghaṭotkaca's chariot, which was drawn neither by horses nor by elephants, but by elephant-like beasts, probably huge buffaloes (M Bh., vii, 156, 6785–7). If Mudgala's horses had been carried off, he would naturally have yoked a powerful bull.