Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
At the present moment scholars seem to be agreed about the date of Nahapāna, and some are of opinion that lie was the founder of the Śaka era. This theory was propounded by M. l'abbé Boyer in his paper entitled “Nahapāna et l'ère Śaka”. Though the theory has not met with general acceptance, eminent scholars are still to be found who maintain this opinion even at the present date. In 1913, during the great debate on the date of Kanishka, Dr. J. F. Fleet said, “I hold that the era [Śaka era] was founded by the Kshaharāta king Nahapāna, who reigned in Kāṭhiāwār and over some of the neighbouring territory as far as Ujjain from a.d. 78 to about a.d. 125, and held for a time Nāsik and other parts in the north of Bombay, and who seems to have been a Pahlava or Palhava, i.e. of Parthian extraction.” There are others who, though they do not assert that Nahapāna was the founder of the Śaka era, maintain that the dates in the inscriptions of his son-in-law Ushavadāta at Nasik and Karle, and of his minister Ayama at Junnar, are Śaka dates. Mr. V. A. Smith says, “Almost all students are agreed that the inscriptions and coins of the Chashṭana line of Satraps are dated in the Śaka era, and I see no reason for doubting that the Kshaharāta records are dated in the same way.”
page 273 note 1 Journal Asiatique, tom, x, pp. 120 sqq.Google Scholar
page 273 note 2 JRAS. 1913, pp. 992–3.Google Scholar
page 273 note 3 Early History of India, 3rd ed., p. 218.Google Scholar
page 274 note 1 Early History of India, 3rd ed., pp. 209–10.Google Scholar
page 274 note 2 JBBRAS., vol. xxiii, pp. 66–73.Google Scholar
page 274 note 3 Epig. Ind., vol. x, App., p. 126, No. 1133.Google Scholar
page 274 note 4 Ibid., p. 134, No. 1174.
page 274 note 5 Rapson, , British Museum Catalogue of Indian Coins; Andhras and Western Kshatrapas, p. cvii.Google Scholar
page 274 note 6 Ibid., p. civ.
page 274 note 7 See ante, 1911–1912, p. 128, pl. lviii.Google Scholar
page 275 note 1 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, p. 44.Google Scholar
page 275 note 2 Ind. Ant., 1908, p. 63.Google Scholar
page 275 note 3 See ante, 1905–1906, p. 166.Google Scholar
page 275 note 4 JBBRAS., vol. xxiii, pp. 66–73.Google Scholar
page 275 note 5 [This is read by ProfessorLüders, as Ysamotika (Berlin, Sitzungsberichte, 1913, pp. 406 sqq.).—F. W. T.]Google Scholar
page 276 note 1 JBBRAS., vol. xxiii, p. 68.Google Scholar [The word is inserted in the Junagadli inscription. See Kielhorn, 's edition in Epigraphia Indica, vol. viii, p. 42.—F. W. T.]Google Scholar
page 276 note 2 Ibid., vol. viii, p. 60.
page 276 note 3 Ibid., p. 73.
page 277 note 1 JBBRAS., vol. x, pp. 122–3, Nos. 1122–4.Google Scholar
page 277 note 2 Ibid., vol. viii, p. 44.
page 280 note 1 JBBRAS., vol. xxiii, p. 70.Google Scholar
page 282 note 1 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, pp. 61–2.Google Scholar
page 282 note 2 Ibid., p. 73.
page 283 note 1 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, p. 71.Google Scholar
page 284 note 1 Bhandarkar, 's History of the Dekkan, 2nd ed., 1895, p. 33.Google Scholar
page 284 note 2 Cat. of Ind. Coins, Andhras and Western Kshatrapas, p. xxxvii.Google Scholar
page 284 note 3 Ibid., lxiii–lxx.
page 284 note 4 Early History of India, 3rd ed., p. 201, n. 1.Google Scholar
page 285 note 1 Cat. of Ind. Coins, Gupta Dynasties, pp. 49–50.Google Scholar
page 285 note 2 JBBRAS., vol. xxiii, p. 72, 1910.Google Scholar
page 285 note 3 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, p. 60.Google Scholar
page 286 note 1 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, p. 44.Google Scholar
page 286 note 2 Ibid., p. 62.
page 286 note 3 Cat. of Ind. Coins, Andhras and Western Kshatrapas, pp. cxx–cxxi.Google Scholar
page 287 note 1 Epig. Ind., vol. viii, p. 61.Google Scholar
page 287 note 2 Cat. of Ind. Coins, Andhras and Western Kshatrapas, p. xxxvi.Google Scholar
page 287 note 3 The Imperial Gazetteer of India gives the following description of the province of Konkan: “A name now applied to the tract of country below the Western Ghats south of the Daman-Ganga river, including Bombay, the Districts of Thana, Kolaba, Ratnagiri, the coast strip of North Kanara, the native states of Janjira, Savantvadi, and the Portuguese territories of Goa.”—Vol. xv, p. 394.
page 288 note 1 JBBRAS., vol. xx, p. 275.Google Scholar
page 289 note 1 Karly History of India, 3rd ed., p. 217.Google Scholar
page 289 note 2 Ibid.