No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
For representations of the now well known Piprāwā relic-vase, reference may be made to this Journal, 1898. 579, plate, bottom; to Antiquities in the Tarai, plate 28, fig. 2, and see plate 13, fig. 1; and to Mr. Vincent Smith's Early History of India, 14, plate.
page 683 note 1 Regarding this corrupt name, see page 687 below.
page 684 note 1 The expression in the original is Himavanta-padēsabhāga, which might be rendered “ a part of the region of the Himavanta; ” especially in view of the fact that, according to Buddhaghōsha, the Thēra Majjhantika, who was deputed to Kashmīr and Gandhāra, converted also numbers of Yakkhas, Gandhabbas, and Kumbhaṇḍas, dwelling on Himavanta. But that appears to have been done by Majjhantika en route to the country or countries —(the Dīpavaṁsa mentions only Gandhāra)— to which he had been sent. And padēsabhāga seems to be constantly used in Pāli in the sense of simply the Sanskrit pradēśa, dēśa, ‘ region, country.’
page 689 note 1 Verse 8 : dāyādō satthu Buddhassa sāsanē.
page 689 note 2 Verse 17: sō vē dāyādō sāsanē.