Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:33:43.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed dispersal, spatial distribution and population structure of Brazilnut trees (Bertholletia excelsa) in southeastern Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Carlos A. Peres  and
Claudia Baider
Carlos A. Peres
Affiliation:
CSERGE, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK
Claudia Baider
Affiliation:
Departament of Ecology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Seeds of the Brazilnut tree (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl., Lecythidaceae) sustain one of the most important extractive industries in neotropical forests. Yet little is known about the demography and seed dispersal ecology of Bertholletia, particularly in natural stands which have not been previously harvested. This study presents data on the population density, spatial distribution, and seed dispersal ecology of Brazilnut trees at a pristine stand located within the Kayapó Indian Area of southeastern Amazonia, Pará, Brazil. Brazilnut trees were primarily found within groves (castanhais) of 75 to 149 trees, with a few isolated trees in between. Although the density of trees ≥ 10 cm in diameter at breast height (hereafter, dbh) at two groves was 4.8 to 5.1 trees ha–1, the overall density for the entire study area of c. 950 ha was estimated at 1.3 tree ha–1. Within-grove nearest neighbour distances averaged 21 m and were markedly skewed towards even shorter distances. Seed dispersal experiments using 709 marked seeds indicated that this pattern can be largely explained by the highly restricted seed shadows imparted by the main seed dispersal agents of Bertholletia at this site, the red-rumped agouti (Dasyprocta leporina). Agoutis on average scatterhoard Bertholletia seeds to an average distance of 5 m, and rarely beyond 20 m, from seed stations. We suggest that, once edaphic and climatic conditions are suitable, the highly contagious spatial distribution of Bertholletia trees at the landscape level can be largely accounted for by the quantitatively dominant effect of short-distance dispersal by caviomorph rodents, and rare events of long-distance dispersal provided by other vectors. This mechanism of grove formation need not resort to untested conjectures of human dispersal and intentional planting in prehistoric and historic times as it has often been suggested in the literature.

Resumo

Semestes da castanheira do pará (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. & Bonpl., Lecythidaceae) são a base de uma indústria extrativista de alta importância socioecônomica em florestas neotropicais. Apesar disso, sabe-se pouco a cerca da demografia da espécie e da ecologia da dispersão de suas sementes. Este estudo mostra dados relativos a densidade populacional, a distribuição espacial, e a ecologia de dispersão de sementes de uma populaçao natural de Bertholletia localizada na Área Indígena Kayapó, sudeste da Amazônia, Pará, Brasil. Castanheiras com diâmetro a altura do peito (dap) ≥ 10 cm foram encontradas em agregados naturais (ou castanhais) com 75 a 149 árvores, com alguns individuos isolados entre eles. A densidade de indivíduos em dois castanhais variou entre 4.8 e 5.1 ind. ha−1, enquanto que a densidade em toda a área de estudo (c. 950 ha) foi estimada em 1.3 ind. ha−1. Dentro de um castanhal, a distância média ao vizinho mais próiximo foi de 21 m, com um forte desvio a distâncias ainda mais curtas. Um experimento de dispersão de sementes, baseado em 709 sementes marcadas, mostrou que isso pode ser decorrente do alcance restrito da dispersão efetivada por cotias (no caso Dasyprocta leporina), o principal agente dispersor de sementes de Bertholletia. Em média, cotias enterraram as sementes a 5 m do ponto amostral, e raramente ultrapassando 20 m. Nós sugerimos que, uma vez que as condições edáficas e climáticas sejam adequadas, a distribuição altamente agregada de Bertholletia pode ser perfeitamente explicada por urn padrão de dispersão a curta distância ocasionado por roedores caviomorfos, sendo raros os eventos de dispersão a longa distância decorrente de outros agentes. Dessa forma, o mecanismo de formação de agregados naturais não precisaria ser explicado por dispersão humana, através de plantios acidentais ou intencionais, como tern sido sugerido na literatura.

Keywords

Brazil-nutsBertholletia excelsaseed dispersalseed predationDasyproctaspatial distributionAmazonia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , July 1997 , pp. 595 - 616
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Balée, W. 1989. The culture of Amazonian forests. Pp. 1–21 in Posey, D. A. & Belée, W. (eds). Resource management in Amazonia: indigenous and folk strategies. New York Botanical Gardens, Bronx, NY.Google Scholar
Balée, W. & Campbell, D. G. 1990. Evidence for the successional status of liana forest (Xingú river basin, Amazonian Brazil). Biotropica 22:36–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boot, R. G. A. & Guluson, R. E. 1995. Approaches to developing sustainable extraction systems for tropical forest products. Ecological Applications 5:896–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, S. T., Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P. & Laake, J. L. 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundances of biological populations. Chapman & Hall, London. 446 pp.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. G., Daly, D. C., Prance, G. T. & Maciel, U. N. 1986. Quantitative ecological inventory of terra firme and várzea tropical forest on the Rio Xingu, Brazilian Amazon. Brittonia 38:369–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, P. J. & Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of the spatial relationship in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, J. W. 1992. Buying in the forest: a new program to market sustainably collected tropical forest products protects forests and forest residents. Pp. 400–415 in Redford, K. H. & Padoch, C. (eds). Conservation of neotropical forests. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Clay, J. W. 1995. Brazil nuts: the use of a keystone species for conservation and development. Wildlife Utilization Study, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Clement, C. R. 1993. Brazil nut. In Clay, J. & Clement, C. R. (eds). Selected species and strategies to enhance income generation from Amazonian forests. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.Google Scholar
Condit, R., Hubbell, S. P. & Foster, R. B. 1992. Recruitment near conspecific adults and the maintenance of tree and shrub diversity in a neotropical forest. American Naturalist 140:261–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connell, J. H. 1971. On the role of natural enemies in preventing competitive exclusion in some marine animals and rain forest tree. Pp. 298–312 in den Boer, P. J. & Gradwell, P. R. (eds). Dynamics of populations. PUDOC, Wageningen.Google Scholar
Dhv Consultants 1993. Estudios agro-ecológicos, forestales y socio-económicos en la région de la castaña de la Amazonia Boliviana. Reporte del Proyecto de Desarrollo Agropecuario (PDA), Banco Mundial/Gobierno de Hollanda.Google Scholar
Dias, C. V. 1959. Aspectos geográficos do comércio da castanha no médio Tocantins. Revista Brasileira de Geogrqfia 21:77–91.Google Scholar
Diniz, T. D. A. S. & Bastos, T. X. 1974. Contribuição ao conhecimento do clima típico da castanha do Brasil. Boletin Técnico IPEAN 64:59–71.Google Scholar
Dubost, G. 1988. Ecology and social life of the red acouchy, Myoprocta exilis: a comparison with the orange-rumped agouti, Dayprocta leporina. Journal of Zoology (London) 214:107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ducke, A. 1946. Plantas de cultura précolombiana na Amazónia Brasileira. Boletin Técnico do Instituto Agronomico do Norte, Belém, 8:2–24.Google Scholar
Emmons, L. H. & Feer, F. 1990. Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 281 pp.Google Scholar
Forget, P.-M. 1990. Seed-dispersal of Voucapoua americana (Caesalpinaceae) by caviomorph rodents in French Guiana, Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, P.-M. 1991. Scatterhoarding of Astrocaryum paracama by Proechymis in French Guiana: comparison with Myoprocta exilis. Tropical Ecology 32:155–167.Google Scholar
Forget, P.-M. 1992. Seed removal and seed fate in Gustavia superba (Lecythidaceae). Biotropica 24:408–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, P.-M. & Milleron, T. 1991. Evidence for secondary seed dispersal by rodents in Panama. Oecologia 87:596–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forget, P.-M. 1994. Recruitment pattern of Voucapoua americana (Caesalpiniaceae), a rodent-dispersed tree in French Guiana. Biotropica 26:408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forget, P.-M., Munoz, E. & Leigh, E. G. Jr. 1994. Predation by rodents and bruchid beetles on seeds of Scheelta palms on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Biotropica 26:420–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, R. B. & Brokaw, N. V. L. 1982. Structure and history of the vegetation of Barro Colorado Island. Pp. 76–82 in Leigh, E. Jr., Rand, A. S. & Windsor, D. (eds). The ecology of a tropical rainforest: seasonal rhythms and long-term changes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Gentry, A. H. 1988. Changes in plant community diversity and floristic composition on environmental and geographical gradients. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 75:1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallwachs, W. 1986. Agoutis (Dasyprocta punctata): the inheritors of guapinol (Hymenaea courbaril: Leguminosae). Pp. 285–304 in Estrada, A. & Fleming, T. H. (eds). Frugivores and seed dispersal. Dr. Junk Publishers, The Hague.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, S. B. & Posey, D. A. 1989. Preliminary results on soil management techniques of Kayapó Indians. Advances in Economic Botany 7:174–188.Google Scholar
Howe, H. F. & Smallwood, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubbell, S. P. 1979. Tree dispersion, abundance, and diversity in a tropical dry forest. Science 203:1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. 1910. Maitas e madeiras amazônicas. Boletim do Museu Paraense de Historia Natural 6:91–225.Google Scholar
Kitamura, P. C. & Müller, C. H. 1984. Castanhais nativos de Marabá-PA: Fatores de depredação e bases para a sua preservação. EMBRAPA, Centro de Pesquisa Agropecuária do Trópico Umido. Documentos 30:1–32.Google Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1970. Herbivores and the number of tree species in tropical forest. American Naturalist 104:501–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, D. H. 1971. Euglossine bees as long-distance pollinators of tropical plants. Science 171:203–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LaFleur, J. 1991. The Brazil nut market. ECOTEC, Recife, Brasil. 57 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, C. J. 1990. Natural history, economic botany, and germplasm conservation of the Brazil nut tree (Bertholletia excelsa, Humb & Bonpl.). M.Sc. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Mori, S. A. 1992. The Brazil nut industry – past, present, and future. Pp. 241–251 in Plotkin, M. & Famolare, L. (eds). Sustainable harvest and marketing of rain forest products. Island Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Mori, S. A. & Prance, G. T. 1990a. Lecythidaceae – Part II. The zygomorphic-flowered New World genera (Bertholletia, Corythophora, Couratari, Couroupita, Eschweilera, & Lecythis). Flora Neotropica Monographs 21 (II):1–376.Google Scholar
Mori, S. A. & Prance, G. T. 1990b. Taxonomy, ecology and economic botany of the Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa Humb. and Bonpl.: Lecythidaceae). Advances in Economic Botany 8:130–150.Google Scholar
Müller, C. H. 1981. Castanha-do-Brasil: estudos agronômicos. EMBRAPA/CPATU, Documentos 1:1–25.Google Scholar
Müller, C. H., Rodrigues, I. A., Müller, A. A. & Müller, N. R. M. 1980. Castanha do Brasil: resultados de pesquisas. EMBRAPA/CPATU, Miscelânea 2:1–25.Google Scholar
Müller, C. H. & Calzavara, B. B. G. 1989. Castanha do Brasil: recomendações básicas. EMBRAPA-CPATU, Belém, Brazil.Google Scholar
Nelson, B. W., Absy, M. L., Barbosa, E. M., Prance, G. T. 1985. Observations on flower visitors to Bertholletia excelsa H.B.K. and Couratari tenuicarpa A.C. Sm. (Lecythidaceae). Acta Amazonica 15(suppl.):225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, B. W., Kapos, V., Adams, J. B., Oliveira, W. J., Braun, O. P. G. & Amaral, I. L. 1994. Forest disturbance by large blowdowns in the Brazilian Amazon. Ecology 75:853–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nepstad, D. C., Brown, I. F., Alexandre, A. & Viana, V. 1992. Biotic impoverishment of Amazonian forests by rubber tappers, loggers, and cattle ranchers. Advances in Economic Botany 9:1–14.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. 1991a. Seed predation of Cariniana micrantha (Lecythidaceae) by brown capuchin monkeys in central Amazonia. Biotropica 23:262–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, C. A. 1991b. Ecology of mixed-species groups of tamarins in Amazonian terra firme forests. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A. In press. Non-volant mammal community structure in different Amazonian forest types. in Eisenberg J. (ed.) Mammals of the Neotropics, Vol. 3. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Peres, C. A., Schiesari, L. C. & Dias-Leme, C. L. 1997. Vertebrate predation of Brazil-nuts, an agouti-dispersed Amazonian seed crop (Bertholletia excelsa, Lecythidaceae): a test of the escape hypothesis. Journal of Tropical Ecology 13:69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pesce, C. 1985. Oil palms and other oilseeds of the Amazon. Reference Publications, Algonac, Michigan. 250 ppl.Google Scholar
Pires, J. M. 1984. The Amazonian forest. Pp. 581–602 in Sioli, H. (ed.). The Amazon: limnology and landscape ecology of a mighty tropical river and its basin. Dr. Junk, Dordrecht, Netherlands.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pires, J. M. & Prance, G. T. 1985. The vegetation types of the Brazilian Amazon. Pp. 109–145 in Prance, G. T. & Lovejoy, T. E. (eds). Key environments: Amazonia. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Poole, R. W. 1974. An introduction to quantitative ecology. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Posey, D. A. 1985. Indigenous management of tropical forest ecosystems: the case of the Kayapó Indians of the Brazilian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems 3:139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prance, G. T. & Mori, S. A. 1978. Observations of the fruits and seeds of neotropical Lecythidaceae. Brittonia 30:21–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. V. & Jenkins, S. H. 1987. Rodents as seed consumers and dispersers. Pp. 191–235 in Murray, D. R. (ed.). Seed dispersal. Academic Press, Orlando, FL, USA.Google Scholar
Radam. 1974. Projeto Radam Brasil. Folha SB 22 Araguaia e parte da folha SC 22 Tocantins. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Richards, P. W. 1952. The tropical rainforest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Roosevelt, A. C., Housley, R. A., Imazio Da Silveira, M., Maranca, S. & Johnson, R. 1991. Eighth millenium pottery from a prehistoric shell midden in the Brazilian Amazon. Science 254:1621–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sánchez, J. S. 1973. Explotación y comercialización de la castaña en Madre de dios. Ministerio de Agricultura, Dirección General de Forestal y Caza, Informe No. 30. Lima, Peru.Google Scholar
Sarukhan, J. 1980. Demographic problems in tropical forests. Pp. 168–188 in Solbrig, O. (ed.). Demography and evolution of plant populations. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Schupp, E. W. 1988. Seed and early seedling predation in the forest understorey and in treefall gaps. Oikos 51:71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, N. 1978. The natural history of the Central American agouti (Dasyprocta punctata). Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 257:1–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, N. 1989. Seed survival in the palm Astrocaryum standleyanum: evidence for dependence upon its seed dispersers. Biotropica 21:50–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smythe, N., Glanz, W. E. & Leigh, E. G. Jr. 1982. Population regulation in some terrestrial frugivores. Pp. 227–238 in Leigh, E. G. Jr., Windsor, A. S. & Windsor, D. M.(eds). The ecology of a tropical forest: seasonal rhythms and long term changes. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Sork, V. L. 1985. Germination response in a large-seeded neotropical tree species, Gustavia superba (Lecythidaceae). Biotropica 17:130–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Souza, M. L. 1984. Estudos de processos tecnológicos para a obtenção de produtos da Castanha-do-Brasil. Fortaleza, Brazil.Google Scholar
Terborgh, J., Losos, E., Riley, M. P. & Riley, M. B. 1993. Predation by vertebrates and invertebrates on the seeds of five canopy tree species of an Amazonian forest. Vegetatio 107/108:375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaz Pereira, I. C. & Costa, S. L. L. 1981. Bibliografia da Castanha-do-Pará (Bertholletia excelsa, H.B.K.). EMBRAPA, Centro de Pesquisas Agropecuário do Trópico Umido. Belém, Pará.Google Scholar
Viana, V. M., Mello, R. A., Morais, L. M. & Mendes, N. T. In press. Ecology and management of Brazil nut populations in extractive reserves in Xapuri, Acre. Biotropica.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1975. Tropical rain forests of the Far East. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. 1989. Canopy gaps and two major groups of forest trees. Ecology 70:536–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar