Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T19:47:50.898Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beautiful or Agreeable? Humour and Wit in The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2025

Melissa Zinkin
Melissa Zinkin*
Affiliation:
Binghamton University, Binghamton, NY, USA
*
Email: mzinkin@binghamton.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, I explore what Robert Clewis, in The Origins of Kant’s Aesthetics, suggests is an ‘analogy’ between humour and beauty. I do this by focusing on Kant’s concept of wit (Witz), which is central to both reflective judgement and humour. By exploring the concept of Witz as a distinctive kind of cognitive activity, I believe a case can be made that the origin of Kant’s mature aesthetic theory in the Critique of the Power of Judgement and his discovery of the principle of taste were, in part, a result of Kant’s thinking about Witz. I therefore share Clewis’s puzzlement about why, in the third Critique, humour, arguably the art of Witz, is not considered to be a beautiful art. I conclude by suggesting a possible reason why Kant thought that a judgement of humour is different from a judgement of beauty.

Keywords

aesthetic judgementhumourreflective judgementtemporalityWitz
Type
Author Meets Critics
Information
Kantian Review , First View , pp. 1 - 8
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Kantian Review

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Giamario, P. T. (2017) ‘Making reason think more: laughter in Kant’s aesthetic philosophy’. Angelaki, 22, 161–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah (2014) The Normativity of Nature: Essays on Kant’s Critique of Judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2000) ‘Editor’s Introduction’. Immanuel Kant. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Tr. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1900 -) Kants Gesammelte Schriften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Tr. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1999) Correspondence. Tr. Arnulf Zweig. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007a) Critique of the Power of Judgment. Tr. Paul Guyer and Eric Matthews. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (2007b) Anthropology, History, and Education. Ed. Günter Zöller and Robert Louden. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makkai, Katalin (2020) Kant’s Critique of Taste: The Feeling of Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zinkin, Melissa (2024) Depth: A Kantian Account of Reason. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar