Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T20:17:41.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Model-based reasoning in financial domains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Walter Hamscher
Affiliation:
Price Waterhouse Technology Centre, 68 Willow Road, Menlo Park, CA 94025, USA.

Abstract

Finance is a challenging yet appropriate domain for model-based reasoning, an area of research otherwise grounded in classical physics. Among the many features that suggest a model-based approach are that firms have formal internal structures, business entities have idealizable behaviours, and there is a history of formal analysis of business problems. This article discusses the motivations and foundations of the model-based approach, and surveys several existing artificial intelligence programs that exploit its advantages. The survey shows that there are ample opportunities for useful systems and significant research in this area. However, accomplishing either of these goals depends crucially upon moving beyond qualitative models based only on accounting information, which tend not to capture the actual complexities of the domain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addanki, S, Cremonini, R and Penberthy, JS, 1991. “Reasoning about assumptions in graphs of modelsArtificial Intelligence 51 (1–3) 145177. (Also in: J de Kleer and B Williams (eds), Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems II North-Holland MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, AD, Duke, GL, Gerlach, J, Ko, C, Meservy, RD and Whinston, , 1985. TICOM and the analysis of internal controls “The Accounting Review” LX (2) 186201.Google Scholar
Bailey, AD, Han, KS, Stansifer, RD and Whinston, AB, 1989. “The advanced internal accounting control model using a logic programming approach” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Bailey, AD, Kiang, Y, Kuipers, B and Whinston, AB, 1990. “Analytical review and qualitative and causal reasoning in auditing” Draft.Google Scholar
Benaroch, M and Dhar, V, 1996. “An intelligent assistant for financial hedging”. In: Proc. 7th IEEE Conf. on AI Applications 168174, Miami, FL.Google Scholar
Benaroch, M and Dhar, V, 1996. “A knowledge-based approach to solving hedge design problems”. In: 1st Int. Conf. on AI Applications on Wall Street140145, New York.Google Scholar
Bouwman, MJ, 1983. “Human diagnostic reasoning by computer: An illustration from financial analysisManagement Science 29 (6) 653672, 06.Google Scholar
Brealey, RA and Myers, SC, 1981. Principles of Corporate Finance. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Bridgeland, DM, 1990. “Three qualitative simulation extensions for supporting economics models”. In: Proc 6th IEEE Conf. on AI Applications266273, Santa Barbara, CA.Google Scholar
Console, L, Theseider Dupré, D and Torasso, P, 1991. “On the relationship between abduction and deduction”. J. Logic and Computation 1 (5) 661690.Google Scholar
Daniels, HAM and Feelders, AJ, 1991. “Combining qualitative and quantitative methods for model-based diagnosis of firms” In: Singh, M and Trave-Massuyes, L (ed), Decision Support Systems and Qualitative Reasoning. North-Holland.Google Scholar
Davis, R and Hamscher, WC, 1988. “Model based reasoning: Troubleshooting”. In: HE Shrobe (ed), Exploring Artificial Intelligence: Survey Talks from the National Conferences of Artificial Intelligence297346. Morgan Kaufmann. (Also in: PH Winston and SA Shellard (eds), 1990. Artificial Intelligence at MIT: Expanding Frontiers MIT Press. And in WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console (eds), 1992, Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Kleer, J and Williams, BC, 1987. “Diagnosing multiple faults”, Artificial Intelligence, 32 (1) 97130, April. (Also in: Ginsberg, ML (ed), 1987, Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning Morgan Kaufmann. And in: WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console (eds), Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.)Google Scholar
de Kleer, J and Williams, BC, 1989. “Diagnosis with behavioral modes”. In: Proc. llth Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence 1324–1330,Detroit, MI. (Also in WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console (eds), 1992, Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
de Kleer, J and Williams, BC, (eds), 1991. Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems II Eisevier.Google Scholar
de Kleer, J, 1986. “An assumption-based TMSArtificial Intelligence 28 (2) 127162. (Also in: Ginsberg, ML (ed), 1987, Readings in Nonmonotonic Reasoning Morgan Kaufmann).Google Scholar
Dhar, V, Lewis, B and Peters, J, 1988. “A knowledge based model of audit riskAI Magazine 9 (3) 5763, Fall.Google Scholar
Elliott, JW and Uphoff, HL, 1972. “Predicting the near term profit and loss statement with an econometric model: A feasibility study” J. Accounting Research 259274, Autumn.Google Scholar
Falkenhainer, B and Forbus, KD, 1991. “Compositional modeling: Finding the right model for the jobArtificial Intelligence 51 (13) 95143. (Also in J de Kleer and B Williams (eds), 1992, Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems II North Holland MIT Press.)Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, EA, McCorduck, P and Nii, HP, 1988. The Rise of the Expert Company. Times Books.Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, de Kleer, J and Console, L, (ed), 1992. Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, 1990. “Explaining unexpected financial results” Technical Report 11, Price Waterhouse Technology Centre, Menlo Park, CA 94025. (Also in Working Notes of the Spring Symposium on Automated Abduction, 96100, AAAI Press, 1990.)Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, 1991a. “ACP: Reason maintenance and inference control for constraint propagation over intervals” In: Proc. 9th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence506511, Anaheim, CA,July. (Also in WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console (eds), 1992, Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, 1991b. “Model-based financial data interpretation” In: 1st Int. Conf. on AI Applications on Wall Street IEEE Press. (Also in: Working Notes of the Model-based Reasoning Workshop AAAI Press, 1991. And in: Working Notes of the 2nd International Workshop on Principles of Diagnosis Technical Report RT/DI/91–10–7, Dipartimento di Informatica, Universita di Torino, 1991.)Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, 1991c. “Modeling digital circuits for trouble shootingArtificial Intelligence 51 (13) 223/271, 10. (Also in: WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console, (eds), 1992, Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.)Google Scholar
Hamscher, WC, 1992. “Modeling accounting processes to support multiple tasks: A progress report” In: Proc. 10th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence,San Jose, CA,July.Google Scholar
Hart, PE, Barzilay, A and Duda, RO, 1986. “Qualitative reasoning for financial assessments: A prospectusAI Magazine 7 (1) 6268, Winter.Google Scholar
Helfert, EA, 1986. Techniques of Financial Analysis. Homewood.Google Scholar
Hillier, FS and Lieberman, GJ, 1980. Introduction to Operations Research Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Hyvönen, E, 1991. “Interval constraint spreadsheets for financial planning.” In: 1st Int. Conf. on AI Applications on Wall Street302311, IEEE Press.Google Scholar
Karp, PD and Wilkins, DC, 1989. “An analysis of the distinction between deep and shallow expert systemsInt. J. Expert Systems Research and Applications 2 (1) 132.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S, 1989. “Report Finds Massive Fraud at Miniscribe” San Jose Mercury News, 4D, 09 12.Google Scholar
Kosy, DW and Wise, BP, 1984. “Self explanatory financial models.” In: Proc. 4th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence176181, Austin, TX,August.Google Scholar
Kosy, DW, 1989. “Applications of explanation in financial modeling.” In: Widman, LE, Loparo, KA and Nielsen, NR, (eds), Artificial Intelligence, Simulation, and Modeling 487509. Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Kuipers, BJ, 1987. “Abstraction by time-scale in qualitative simulation.” In: Proc. 6th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence621625, Seattle, WA,August. (Also in DS Weld and J de Kleer (eds), 1990, Readings in Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems Morgan Kaufmann.)Google Scholar
Maher, ML, 1990. “Process models for design synthesis.” AI Magazine, 11 (4) 4958, Winter.Google Scholar
MiniScribe, 1989. Summary of Report of the Independent Evaluation Committee of the Board of Directors of MiniScribe Corporation. Exhibit provided in 8-K Disclosure, 09 12.Google Scholar
Peters, JM, 1990. “A cognitive computational model of risk hypothesis generation.” J Accounting Research 28 (Supplement) 83103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, D, 1991. “Representing diagnostic knowledge for probabilistic Horn abduction.” In: Proc. 12th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence11291135, Sydney, Australia,August. (Also in: WC Hamscher, J de Kleer and L Console (eds), 1992, Readings in Model-based Diagnosis Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Saltzman, S, 1967. “An econometric model of a firm.” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 49 332342, 08.Google Scholar
Weld, DS and Addanki, S, 1990. “Query-directed approximation.” Technical Report 90–12–02, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, FR-35, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Weld, DS and de Kleer, J, 1990. Readings in Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Wild, JJ, 1987. “The prediction performance of a structural model of accounting numbersJ. Accounting Research 25 (1) 139160, Spring.Google Scholar
Williams, BC, 1990. “Interaction-based invention: Designing novel devices from first principles” In: Proc. 8th National Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, 349356, Boston, MA,August.Google Scholar
Zipser, A, 1989. “How pressure to Raise Sales Led MiniScribe to Falsify NumbersWall Street Journal, 1 09 11.Google Scholar