Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T02:56:14.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Situational reasoning for task-oriented mobile service recommendation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

MARKO LUTHER ,
YUSUKE FUKAZAWA ,
MATTHIAS WAGNER  and
SHOJI KURAKAKE
MARKO LUTHER
Affiliation:
DoCoMo Euro-Labs, Landsbergerstr. 312, 80687 Munich, Germany e-mail: luther@docomolab-euro.com, wagner@docomolab-euro.com
YUSUKE FUKAZAWA
Affiliation:
NTT DoCoMo Inc., 3-5 Hikari-no-oka, Yokusuka, Kanagawa, 239-8536Japan e-mail: fukazawayuu@nttdocomo.co.jp, kurakake@nttdocomo.co.jp
MATTHIAS WAGNER
Affiliation:
DoCoMo Euro-Labs, Landsbergerstr. 312, 80687 Munich, Germany e-mail: luther@docomolab-euro.com, wagner@docomolab-euro.com
SHOJI KURAKAKE
Affiliation:
NTT DoCoMo Inc., 3-5 Hikari-no-oka, Yokusuka, Kanagawa, 239-8536Japan e-mail: fukazawayuu@nttdocomo.co.jp, kurakake@nttdocomo.co.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study the case of integrating situational reasoning into a mobile service recommendation system. Since mobile Internet services are rapidly proliferating, finding and using appropriate services require profound service descriptions. As a consequence, for average mobile users it is nowadays virtually impossible to find the most appropriate service among the many offered. To overcome these difficulties, task navigation systems have been proposed to guide users towards best-fitting services. Our goal is to improve the user experience of such task navigation systems making them context-aware (i.e. to optimize service navigation by taking the user's situation into account). We propose the integration of a situational reasoning engine that applies classification-based inference to qualitative context elements, gathered from multiple sources and represented using ontologies. The extended task navigator enables the delivery of situation-aware recommendations in a proactive way. Initial experiments with the extended system indicate a considerable improvement of the navigator's usability.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 23 , Special Issue 1: Contexts and Ontologies , March 2008 , pp. 7 - 19
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D. and Patel-Schneider, P. 2003 The Description Logic Handbook—Theory, Implementation and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bechhofer, S., Möller, R. and Crowther, P. 2003 The DIG description logic interface. In Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G. and Franconi, E. (eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics (DL’03), Rome, Italy, vol. 81 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings. CEUR-WS.org, pp. 152–159.Google Scholar
Böhm, S., Luther, M., Koolwaaij, J. and Wagner, M. 2006 ContextWatcher—connecting to places, people, and the world. In Proceedings of the Poster and Demo Track of the 5th International SemanticWeb Conference (ISWC’06), Athens, GA, USA.Google Scholar
de Bruin, J., Polleres, A., Lara, R. and Fensel, D. 2005 OWL—WSML Working Draft 05–15–2005 D20.1v0.2, DERI.Google Scholar
Carrol, J., Dickinson, I., Dollin, C., Reynolds, D., Seaborne, A. and Wilkinson, K. 2004 Jena: implementing the Semantic Web recommendations. In Feldman, et al. 2004, pp. 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Finin, T. and Joshi, A. 2005. The SOUPA ontology for pervasive computing. In Tamma, V., Cranefield, S., Finin, T. and Willmott, S. (eds.), Ontologies for Agents: Theory and Experiences, Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp. 233–258.Google Scholar
Duran-Limon, H. A., Blair, G. S., Friday, A., Grace, P., Samartizidis, G., Sivaharan, T. and Wu, M. 2004 Context-Aware Middleware for Pervasive and Ad Hoc Environments. Technical Report, Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Feldman, S. I., Uretsky, M., Najork, M. and Wills, C. E. (eds.) 2004 Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the World Wide Web (WWW’04), Manhattan, NY, USA: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Fikes, R., Hayes, P. and Horrocks, I. 2004. OWL-QL: A language for deductive query answering on the Semantic Web, Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 2(1), 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Floréen, P., Przybilski, M., Nurmi, P. 2005 Towards a context management framework for MobiLife. In Proceedings of the IST Mobile & Communications Summit, Dresden, Germany.Google Scholar
Fukazawa, Y., Naganuma, T., Fujii, K., and Kurakake, S. 2006 Service navigation system enhanced by place- and task-based categorization. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications and Services (MobiSys’06), Upsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Galinski, J., Kaya, A. and Möller, R. 2005 Development of a server to support the formal Semantic Web query language OWL-QL. In Horrocks, et al. 2005.Google Scholar
Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, R. and Musen, M. (eds.) 2005 Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’05), Galway, Ireland, vol. 3729 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Grau, B., Parsia, B. and Sirin, E. 2006 Combining OWL ontologies using E-connections, Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 4(1), 40–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grosof, B., Horrocks, I., Volz, R. and Decker, S. 2003 Description Logic programs: combining logic programs with Description Logic. In Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW’03), Budapest, Hungary: ACM Press.Google Scholar
Haarslev, V. and Möller, R. 2003 Racer: a core inference engine for the Semantic Web Ontology Language (OWL). In Sure, Y. and Corchó, O. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology-Based Tools (EON’03), Sanibel Island, Florida, USA, vol. 87 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org. pp. 27–36.Google Scholar
Haarslev, V., Möller, R. and Wessel, M. 2005 Description Logic inference technology: lessions learned in the trenches. In Horrocks, et al. 2005, pp. 160–167.Google Scholar
Hobbs, J. and Pan, F. 2004 An ontology of time for the Semantic Web, ACM Transactions on Asian Language Information Processing 3(1), 66–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, I. and Patel-Schneider, P. 2004 A proposal for an OWL rules language. In Feldman, et al. 2004, pp. 723–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horrocks, I., Sattler, U. & Wolter, F. (eds.). 2005 International Workshop on Description Logics (DL’05), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, vol. 147 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org.Google Scholar
Kernchen, R., Bonnefoy, D., Battestini, A., Mrohs, B., Wagner, M. and Klemettinen, M. (2006) Context-awareness in MobiLife. In Proceedings of the 15th IST Mobile & Wireless Communication Summit. Mykonos, Greece.Google Scholar
Khushraj, D. and Lassila, O. 2004 CALI: context awareness via logical inference. In Proceedings of the ISWC’04 Workshop on Semantic Web Technology for Mobile and Ubiquitous Applications (SWMU’04), Hiroshima, Japan.Google Scholar
Klemettinen, M. (ed.). 2007 Enabling Technologies for Mobile Services: The MobiLife Book. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J., Park, I., Lee, D. and Hyun, S. (2005) Application-oriented context pre-fetch method for improving inference performance in ontology-based context management. In Lee, J. (ed.) Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Contexts and Ontologies: Theory, Practice and Applications at AAAI’05, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA. pp. 41–48.Google Scholar
Liebig, T., Luther, M., Noppens, O., Paolucci, M., Wagner, M. and von Henke, F. 2005 Building applications and tools for OWL. In Grau, B. C., Horrocks, I., Parsia, B. and Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED’05), Galway, Ireland, vol. 188 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings,CEUR-WS.org. pp. 190–201.Google Scholar
Luther, M., Böhm, S., Wagner, M. and Koolwaaij, J. (2005a) Enhanced presence tracking for mobile applications. In Gil, et al. 2005, pp. 105–108.Google Scholar
Luther, M., Mrohs, B., Wagner, M., Steglich, S. and Kellerer, W. (2005b) Situational reasoning—a practical OWL use case. In Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS’05), Chengdu, China. pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
Martin, D., Burstein, M., Hobbs, J. J. 2004 OWL-S: Semantic Markup for Web Services. W3C Member Submission, The OWL Services Coalition.Google Scholar
McGuinness, D. and van Harmelen, F. 2004 OWL Web Ontology Language overview. W3C Recommendation REC-owl-features-20040210, World Wide Web Consortium.Google Scholar
Moran, T.P. and Dourish, P. 2001 Introduction to special issue on context-aware computing, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) 16(2–3), 87–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Motik, B., Sattler, U. and Struder, R. 2005 Query answering for OWL-DL with rules, Journal of Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web 3(1), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mrohs, B., Luther, M., Vaidya, R., Wagner, M., Steglich, S., Kellerer, W. and Arbanowski, S. 2005 OWL-SF—a distributed semantic service framework. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Context Awareness for Proactive Systems (CAPS’05), Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press. pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
Naganuma, T. and Kurakake, S. 2005 Task knowledge based retrieval for service relevant to mobile user activity. In Gil, et al. 2005, pp. 959–973.Google Scholar
Naganuma, T., Luther, M., Wagner, M., Tomioka, A., Fujii, K., Fukazawa, Y. and Kuakake, S. 2006 Task-oriented mobile service recommendation enhanced by a situational reasoning engine. In Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z. and Giunchiglia, F. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st Asian Semantic Web Conference (ASWC’06), Beijing, China, vol. 4185 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Berlin: Springer Verlag. pp. 768–774.Google Scholar
Pan, F. and Hobbs, J. 2004 Time in OWL-S. In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Semantic Web Services, California, USA: Stanford University. pp. 29–36.Google Scholar
Parsia, B., Halaschek-Wiener, C. and Sirin, E. 2006 Towards incremental reasoning through updates in OWL-DL. In WWW’06 Workshop on Reasoning on the Web (RoW’06), Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
Sirin, E., Grau, B. C. and Parsia, B. (2006) From wine to water: optimizing Description Logic reasoning for nominals. In Doherty, P., Mylopoulos, J. and Welty, C. A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’06), Lake District, UK: AAAI Press. pp. 90–99.Google Scholar
Sirin, E., Parsia, B., Grau, B. C. and Kalyanpur, A. 2007 Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner, Journal of Web Semantics, 5(1), pp. 51–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsarkov, D. and Horrocks, I. 2005 Ordering heuristics for Description Logic reasoning. In Kaelbling, L.P. and Saffiotti, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’05), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK: Professional Book Center. pp. 609–614.Google Scholar
Turhan, A.-Y., Bechhofer, S., Kaplunova, A., Liebig, T., Luther, M., Möller, R., Noppens, O., Patel-Schneider, P., Suntisrivaraporn, B., Weithner, T. 2006 DIG2.0—towards a flexible interface for Description Logic reasoners. In Grau, B. C., Horrocks, I., Parsia, B. and Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.), Proceedings of the OWL Experiences and Directions Workshop (OWLED’06) at the ISWC’06, Athens, Georgia, USA, vol. 216 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org.Google Scholar
Wang, X., Zhang, Q., Gu, T. and Pung, H. K. 2004 Ontology-based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In Proceedings of the PerCom Workshop on Context Modeling and Reasoning (CoMoRea’04), Orlando, FL, USA. pp. 18–22.Google Scholar
Weithöner, T., Liebig, T., Luther, M., and Böhm, S. 2006 What's wrong with OWL benchmarks? In Wache, H., Stuckenschmidt, H., Parsia, B., Guo, Y., Finin, T. and Beckett, D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Scalable Semantic Web Knowledge Base Systems (SSWS’06), Athens, GA, USA. pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
Yau, S. S., Karim, F., Wang, Y., Wang, B., and Gupta, S. K., 2002 Reconfigurable context-sensitive middleware for pervasive computing, Pervasive Computing 1(3), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar