Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T23:05:54.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sensory-motor theory of semantics: Evidence from functional imaging

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2014

Uta Noppeney
Uta Noppeney*
Affiliation:
MPI for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen
*
Correspondence addresses: Uta Noppeney, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Spemannstrasse 41, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. E-mail: uta.noppeney@tuebingen.mpg.de.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This review discusses the contributions of functional imaging (fMRI/PET) to our understanding of how semantic concepts are represented and processed in the human brain. The sensory-motor theory of semantic memory suggests that semantic processing relies on reactivation of sensory-motor representations that were involved in perception and action. More specifically, it attributes an apparent category-specific (e.g. tool vs. animals) organization of semantics to anatomical segregation for different semantic features (e.g. action vs. visual). Within this framework, we will review functional imaging evidence that semantic processing of tools and actions may rely on activations within the visuo-motor system.

Keywords

semanticsfMRIfunctional imagingcategorysensory-motor theoryaction
Type
Research Article
Information
Language and Cognition , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 2009 , pp. 249 - 276
Copyright
Copyright © UK Cognitive Linguistics Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allport, D. A. 1985. Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In Newman, S. K. & Epstein, R. (eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia, 32–60. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Arbib, M. & Bota, M.. 2003. Language evolution: Neural homologies and neuroinformatics. Neural Networks 16. 1237–1260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W., Barbey, A. K., Simmons, W. K. & Wilson, C. D. 2003. Grounding conceptual knowledge in modality-specific systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7. 84–91.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, M. S., Argall, B. D., Lee, K. E. & Martin, A.. 2004. Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron 41. 809–823.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, M. S., Haxby, J. V., Lee, K. E. & Martin, A.. 2002. Parallel visual motion processing streams for manipulable objects and human movements. Neuron 34. 149–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beauchamp, M. S., Haxby, J. V., Lee, K. E., Martin, A.. 2003. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15. 991–1001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonda, E., Evans, A., Ostry, D. & Petrides, M.. 1996. Specific involvement of human parietal systems and the amygdala in the perception of biological motion. Journal of Neuroscience 16. 3737–3744.Google Scholar
Boronat, C. B., Buxbaum, L. J., Coslett, H. B., Detre, J. A., Kimberg, D. Y., Saffran, E. M. & Tang, K.. 2005. Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cognitive Brain Research 23. 361–373.Google Scholar
Bozeat, S., Garrard, P., Hodges, J. R., Ralph, M. A. Lambon & Patterson, K.. 2000. Nonverbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia 38. 1207–1215.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Binkofski, F., Fadiga, L., Fink, G. R., Fogassi, L., Freund, H. J., Gallese, V., Rizzolatti, G., Seitz, R. J. & Zilles, K.. 2001. Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: An fMRI study. The European Journal of Neuroscience 13. 400–404.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Benuzzi, F., Canessa, N., Lagravinese, G., Lui, F., Patteri, I., Porro, C. A. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2004a. Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: An FMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16. 114–126.Google Scholar
Buccino, G., Fink, G. R., Freund, H., Ritzl, A., Rizzolatti, G., Vogt, S. & Zilles, K.. 2004b. Neural circuits underlying imitation learning of hand actions: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron 42. 323–334.Google Scholar
Buxbaum, L., Schwartz, M. & Veramonti, T.. 2000. Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: Knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’. Neurocase 6. 83–97.Google Scholar
Canessa, N., Borgo, F., Buccino, G., Cappa, S. F., Falini, A., Perani, D., Shallice, T. & Tettamanti, M.. 2007. The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: An fMRI Study. Cerebal Cortex.Google Scholar
Capitani, E., Caramazza, A., Laiacona, M. & Mahon, B.. 2003. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the clinical evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20. 213–262.Google Scholar
Cappa, S. F., Fazio, F., Perani, D., Schnur, T. & Tettamanti, M.. 1998. The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: A PET study. Neuroimage 8. 350–359.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A. & Shelton, J. R.. 1998. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10. 1–34.Google Scholar
Chao, L. L., Haxby, J. V. & Martin, A.. 1999. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 2. 913–919.Google Scholar
Chao, L. L. & Martin, A.. 2000. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream [In Process Citation]. Neuroimage 12. 478–484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chao, L. L., Martin, A. & Weisberg, J.. 2002. Experience-dependent modulation of category-related cortical activity. Cerebral Cortex 12. 545–551.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. R. 1989. Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systems-level proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition 33. 25–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Hichwa, R. D. & Tranel, D.. 1996. A neural basis for lexical retrieval [see comments] [published erratum appears in Nature 1996 Jun 27; 381(6595):810]. Nature 380. 499–505.Google Scholar
Decety, J., Costes, N., Fazio, F., Grassi, F., Grezes, J., Jeannerod, M., Perani, D. & Procyk, E.. 1997. Brain activity during observation of actions. Influence of action content and subject's strategy. Brain 120. 1763–1777.Google Scholar
Devlin, J. T., Frackowiak, R. S., Friston, K. J., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Moore, C. J., Mummery, C. J., Phillips, J. A., Price, C. J. & Noppeney, U.. 2002. Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity. Neuroimage 15. 675–685.Google Scholar
Fang, F. & He, S.. 2005. Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience 8. 1380–1385.Google Scholar
Farah, M. J., McMullen, P. A. & Meyer, M. M.. 1996. The living nonliving dissociation is not an artefact: Giving an a priori implausible hypothesis a strong test. Cognitive Neuropsychology 13. 137–154.Google Scholar
Fiez, J. A., Balota, D. A., Petersen, S. E.., Raichle, M. E. & Tallal, P.. 1996. PET activation of posterior temporal regions during auditory word presentation and verb generation. Cerebral Cortex 6. 1–10.Google Scholar
Fogassi, L., Chersi, F., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rizzolatti, G. & Rozzi, S.. 2005. Parietal lobe: From action organization to intention understanding. Science 308. 662–667.Google Scholar
Fogassi, L. & Luppino, G.. 2005. Motor functions of the parietal lobe. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 15. 626–631.Google Scholar
Friston, K. J. & Price, C. J.. 2001. Generative models, brain function and neuroimaging. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 42. 167–177.Google Scholar
Gainotti, G. 2000. What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: A review. Cortex 36. 539–559.Google Scholar
Gainotti, G., Daniele, A., Giustolisi, L. & Silveri, M. C.. 1995. Neuroanatomical correlates of category-specific semantic disorders: A critical survey. Memory 3. 247–264.Google Scholar
Gainotti, G. & Silveri, M. C.. 1996. Cognitive and anatomical locus of lesion in a patient with a category-specific semantic impairment for living beings. Cognitive Neuropsychology 13. 357–389.Google Scholar
Gerlach, C., Gade, A., Law, I. & Paulson, O. B.. 2000. Categorization and category effects in normal object recognition. A PET study [In Process Citation]. Neuropsychologia 38. 1693–703.Google Scholar
Gerlach, C., Gade, A., Law, I. & Paulson, O. B.. 2002a. The role of action knowledge in the comprehension of artefacts—A PET study. Neuroimage 15. 143–152.Google Scholar
Gerlach, C., Law, I. & Paulson, O. B.. 2002b. When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14. 1230–1239.Google Scholar
Grabowski, T. J., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. R.. 1998. Premotor and prefrontal correlates of category-related lexical retrieval. Neuroimage 7. 232–243.Google Scholar
Grafton, S. T., Arbib, M. A., Fadiga, L. & Rizzolatti, G.. 1997. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 6. 231–236.Google Scholar
Grezes, J., Armony, J. L., Passingham, R. E. & Rowe, J.. 2003. Activations related to “mirror” and “canonical” neurones in the human brain: An fMRI study. Neuroimage 18. 928–937.Google Scholar
Grezes, J., Costes, N. & Decety, J.. 1998. Top-down effect of strategy on the perception of human biological motion: A PET investigation. Cognitive Neuropsychology 15. 553–582.Google Scholar
Grezes, J. & Decety, J.. 2001. Functional anatomy of execution, mental simulation, observation, and verb generation of actions: A meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping 12. 1–19.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermuller, F.. 2004. Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41. 301–307.Google Scholar
Hillis, A. E. & Caramazza, A.. 1991. Category-specific naming and comprehension impairment: a double dissociation. Brain 114. 2081–2094.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Bozeat, S., Ralph, M. A. Lambon, Patterson, K. & Spatt, J.. 2000. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. Brain 123. Pt 9. 1913–1925.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Davies, R. R. & Patterson, K.. 2006. Semantic dementia, or, a little knowledge is a dangerous thing. In Miller, B. & Boeve, B. (eds.), The behavioural neurology of dementia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Graham, N. & Patterson, K.. 1995. Charting the progression in semantic dementia: Implications for the organisation of semantic memory. Memory 3. 463–495.Google Scholar
Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K. & Spatt, J.. 1999. “What” and “how”: Evidence for the dissociation of object knowledge and mechanical problem-solving skills in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96. 9444–9448.Google Scholar
Horwitz, B. 2003. The elusive concept of brain connectivity. Neuroimage 19. 466–470.Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. W. & Forde, E. M.. 2001. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24. 453–476.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M., Buccino, G., Gallese, V., Mazziotta, J. C., Molnar-Szakacs, I. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2005. Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology 3. e79.Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M., Bekkering, H., Brass, M., Mazziotta, J. C., Rizzolatti, G. & Woods, R. P.. 1999. Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. Science 286. 2526–2528.Google Scholar
James, T. W. & Gauthier, I.. 2003. Auditory and action semantic features activate sensory-specific perceptual brain regions. Current Biology 13. 1792–1796.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. 2001. Neural simulation of action: A unifying mechanism for motor cognition. Neuroimage 14. S103–S109.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M & Frak, V.. 1999. Mental imaging of motor activity in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 9. 735–739.Google Scholar
Johnson-Frey, S. H., Farrer, C., Grafton, S. T., Inati, S., Maloof, F. R. & Newman-Norlund, R.. 2003. Actions or hand-object interactions? Human inferior frontal cortex & action observation. Neuron 39. 1053–1058.Google Scholar
Kellenbach, M., Brett, M. & Patterson, K.. 2003. Actions speak louder than functions. The importance of manipulability and action in tool representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15. 30–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiefer, M., Hauk, O., Liebich, S., Sim, E. J. & Tanaka, J.. 2007. Experience-dependent plasticity of conceptual representations in human sensory-motor areas. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19. 525–542.Google Scholar
Kohler, E., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Keysers, C., Rizzolatti, G. & Umilta, M. A.. 2002. Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297. 846–848.Google Scholar
Kourtzi, Z. & Kanwisher, N.. 2000. Activation in human MT/MST by static images with implied motion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 12. 48–55.Google Scholar
Kraut, M. A., Hart, J. Jr., Moo, L. R. & Segal, J. B.. 2002. Neural activation during an explicit categorization task: Category- or feature-specific effects? Cognitive Brain Research 13. 213–220.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. W., Brefczynski, J. A., DeYoe, E. A., Janik, J. J. & Phinney, R. E.. 2005. Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds. Journal of Neuroscience 25. 5148–5158.Google Scholar
Longe, O., Randall, B., Stamatakis, E. A. & Tyler, L. K.. 2007. Grammatical categories in the brain: The role of morphological structure. Cerebral Cortex 17. 1812–1820.Google Scholar
Maguire, E. A. & Mummery, C. J.. 1999. Differential modulation of a common memory retrieval network revealed by positron emission tomography. Hippocampus 9. 54–61.Google Scholar
Martin, A. & Chao, L. L.. 2001. Semantic memory and the brain: Structure and processes. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 11. 194–201.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Ungerleider, L. G. & Wiggs, C. L.. 1995. Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science 270. 102–105.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V. & Ungerleider, J. V.. 2000. Category-specificity and the brain: The sensory / motor model of semantic representations of objects. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (ed.), The cognitive neurosciences, 1023–1037. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Wiggs, C. L. & Ungerleider, L. G.. 1996. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature 379. 649–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McIntosh, A. R. 2000. Towards a network theory of cognition. Neural Networks 13. 861–870.Google Scholar
Mechelli, A., Friston, K. J., Price, C. J. & Noppeney, U.. 2003. A dynamic causal modeling study on category effect: bottom-up or top-down mediation? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15. 925–934.Google Scholar
Mecklinger, A., Besson, M., Gruenewald, C., Magnie, M. N. & von Cramon, D. Y.. 2002. Separable neuronal circuitries for manipulable and non-manipulable objects in working memory. Cerebral Cortex 12. 1115–1123.Google Scholar
Mesulam, M. M. 1990. Large-scale neurocognitive networks & distributed processing for attention, language and memory. Annals of Neurology 28. 597–613.Google Scholar
Moore, C. J. & Price, C. J.. 1999. A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain 122. 943–962.Google Scholar
Mummery, C. J., Hodges, J. R.Patterson, K. & Price, C. J.. 1998. Functional neuroanatomy of the semantic system: Divisible by what? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 10. 766–777.Google Scholar
Mummery, C. J., Hodges, J. R., Patterson, K. & Wise, R. J.. 1996. Generating ‘tiger’ as an animal name or a word beginning with T: Differences in brain activation [published erratum appears in Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 1996 Dec 22; 263(1377):1755–6]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 263. 989–995.Google Scholar
Murata, A., Gallese, V., Kaseda, M., Luppino, G. & Sakata, H.. 2000. Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology 83. 2580–2601.Google Scholar
Nelissen, K., Luppino, G., Orban, G. A., Rizzolatti, G. & Vandufel, W.. 2005. Observing others: Multiple action representation in the frontal lobe. Science 310. 332–336.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U. 2004. The feature-based model of semantic memory. In Frackowiak, R., Ashburner, J., Dolan, R., Friston, K., Frith, C. D., Penny, W., Price, C., Zeki, S.. (eds.), Human brain function, 533–547. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U., Friston, K. & Price, C.. 2003. Effects of visual deprivation on the organisation of the semantic system. Brain 126. 1620–1627.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U., Friston, K.. Hocking, J., Josephs, O. & Price, C.. 2007. The effect of prior visual information on recognition of speech and sounds. Cerebral Cortex.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U., Friston, K.Josephs, O., Kiebel, S. & Price, C.. 2005. Action selectivity in parietal and temporal cortex. Brain Res. Cognitive Brain Research 25. 641–649.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U., Bright, P., Moss, H. E., Mummery, C. J., Patterson, K., Price, C., Stamatakis, E. A. & Tyler, C. L.. 2006a. Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: A comparison of Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis and Semantic dementia. Brain.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U. & Price, C. J.. 2003. Functional imaging of the semantic system: Retrieval of sensory-experienced and verbally-learnt knowledge. Brain and Language 84. 120–133.Google Scholar
Noppeney, U., Price, C. J., Friston, K. J. & Penny, W. D.. 2006b. Two distinct neural mechanisms for category-selective responses. Cerebral Cortex 16. 437–445.Google Scholar
Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J. & Rogers, T. T.. 2007. Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8. 976–987.Google Scholar
Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Collina, S., Fazio, F., Rosa, M. M., Schnur, T. & Tettamanti, M.. 1999a. The neural correlates of verb and noun processing. A PET study. Brain 122. 2337–2344.Google Scholar
Perani, D., Borghese, N. A., Decety, J., Fazio, F., Ferrari, S., Gilardi, M. C. & Tettamanti, M.. 2001. Different brain correlates for watching real and virtual hand actions. Neuroimage 14. 749–758.Google Scholar
Perani, D., Cappa, S. F., Fazio, F., Gorno-Tempini, M., Schnur, T. & Tettamanti, M.. 1999b. Word and picture matching: A PET study of semantic category effect. Neuropsychologia 37. 293–306.Google Scholar
Petrides, M., Cadoret, G. & Mackey, S.. 2005. Orofacial somatomotor responses in the macaque monkey homologue of Broca's area. Nature 435. 1235–1238.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. A., Humphreys, G. W., Price, C. J. & Noppeney, U.. 2002a. The neural substrates of action retrieval: An examination of semantic and visual routes to action. Vision and Cognition 9(4). 662–684.Google Scholar
Phillips, J. A., Humphreys, G. W., Price, C. J. & Noppeney, U.. 2002b. Can segregation within the semantic system account for category-specific deficits? Brain 125. 2067–2080.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F. 2005. Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6. 576–582.Google Scholar
Pulvermuller, F., Hauk, O., Ilmoniemi, R. J. & Nikulin, V. V.. 2005. Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience 21. 793–797.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Arbib, M. A..1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences 21. 188–194.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., & Craighero, L. 2004. The mirror-neuron system. Annual Review of Neuro-science 27. 169–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rizzolatti, G., Bettinardi, V., Fadiga, L., Fazio, F., Matelli, M., Paulesu, E. & Perani, D.. 1996. Localization of grasp representations in humans by PET: 1. Observation versus execution. Experimental Brain Research 111. 246–252.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V.. 2002. Motor and cognitive functions of the ventral premotor cortex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 12. 149–154.Google Scholar
Rizzolatti, G. & Luppino, G.. 2001. The cortical motor system. Neuron 31. 889–901.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. T., Bozeat, S., Garrard, P., Hodges, J. R., Ralph, M. A. Lambon, McClelland, J. L. & Patterson, K.. 2004. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review 111. 205–235.Google Scholar
Ruby, P. & Decety, J.. 2001. Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: A PET investigation of agency. Nature Neuroscience 4. 546–550.Google Scholar
Rushworth, M. F., Johansen-Berg, H., Gobel, S. M. & Devlin, J. T.. 2003. The left parietal and premotor cortices: Motor attention and selection. Neuroimage 20 Suppl 1. S89–100.Google Scholar
Sacchett, C. & Humphreys, G. W.. 1992. Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artifactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology 5. 3–25.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Job, R. & Miozzo, M.. 1993. Category-specific naming impairments? Yes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 A. 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senior, C., Barnes, J., Brammer, M., Bullmore, E. T., David, A. S.. Giampietro, V. & Simmons, A.. 2000. The functional neuroanatomy of implicit-motion perception or representational momentum. Current Biology 10. 16–22.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. 1988. From neuropsychology to mental structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. 1996. The language-to-object perception interface: Evidence from neuropsychology. In Bloom, P., Garrett, M., Nadel, L. & Peterson, M.. (eds.), Language & Space, 531–552. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, K. A., Caramazza, A. & Moo, L. R.. 2006. Cortical signatures of noun and verb production. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103. 1644–1649.Google Scholar
Sirigu, A., Duhamel, J. R. & Poncet, M.. 1991. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia [published erratum appears in Brain 1992 Apr; 115(Pt2):645]. Brain 114. 2555–2573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, J., Goulding, P. & Neary, D.. 1989. Semantic Dementia: A form of circumscribed brain atrophy. Behavioural Neurology 2. 167–182.Google Scholar
Taylor, K. I., Moss, H. E., Stamatakis, E. A. & Tyler, L. K.. 2006. Binding crossmodal object features in perirhinal cortex. Procedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103. 8239–8244.Google Scholar
Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Cappa, S. F., Danna, M., Fazio, F., Gallese, V., Perani, D., Rizzolatti, G., Saccuman, M. C., Scifo, P.. 2005. Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17. 273–281.Google Scholar
Thompson-Schill, S. L., Aguirre, G. K., D'Esposito, M. & Farah, M. J.. 1999. A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia 37. 671–676.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Bright, P., Fletcher, P. & Stamatakis, E. A.. 2004. Neural processing of nouns and verbs: the role of inflectional morphology. Neuropsychologia 42. 512–523.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K. & Moss, H. E.. 2001. Towards a distributed account of conceptual knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5. 244–252.Google Scholar
Tyler, L. K., Durrant-Peatfield, M. R., Levy, J. P. & Moss, H. E.. 2000. Conceptual structure and the structure of concepts: A distributed account of category-specific deficits. Brain and Language 75. 195–231.Google Scholar
Umilta, M. A., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., Keysers, C., Kohler, E. & Rizzolatti, G.. 2001. I know what you are doing. A neurophysiological study. Neuron 31. 155–165.Google Scholar
Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Ostergaard, L., Ostergaard, S. & Roepstorff, A.. 2005. Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. Neuroreport 649–652.Google Scholar
Warburton, E., Frackowiak, R. S., Hadar, U., Price, C. J., Ramsay, S., Weiller, C. & Wise, R. J.. 1996. Noun and verb retrieval by normal subjects. Studies with PET. Brain 119. 159–179.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K. & McCarthy, R. A.. 1987. Categories of knowledge. Further fractionations and an attempted integration. Brain 110. 1273–1296.Google Scholar
Warrington, E. K. & Shallice, T.. 1984. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107. 829–854.Google Scholar
Weisberg, J., Martin, A. & van Turennout, M.. 2007. A neural system for learning about object function. Cerebral Cortex 17. 513–521.Google Scholar