Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-21T18:09:31.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A classification of illocutionary acts1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

John R. Searle
Affiliation:
University of California

Abstract

There are at least a dozen linguistically significant dimensions of differences between illocutionary acts. Of these, the most important are illocutionary point, direction of fit, and expressed psychological state. These three form the basis of a taxonomy of the fundamental classes of illocutionary acts. The five basic kinds of illocutionary acts are: representatives (or assertives), directives, commissives, expressives, and declarations. Each of these notions is defined. An earlier attempt at constructing a taxonomy by Austin is defective for several reasons, especially in its lack of clear criteria for distinguishing one kind of illocutionary force from another. Paradigm performative verbs in each of the five categories exhibit different syntactical properties. These are explained. (Speech acts, Austin's taxonomy, functions of speech, implications for ethnography and ethnology; English.)

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1957). Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard and Oxford.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1968). Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts. Philosophical Review LXXVII. 405424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar