Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:20:48.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planning language treatment: linguistics for the third world1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Björn H. Jernudd
Björn H. Jernudd
Affiliation:
Culture Learning Institute, East-West Center
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I shall argue that adoption of linguistics at institutions of higher learning in its present international disciplinary form, and in its expression through the medium of English (because English is a major foreign or second language in much of the world and the by far dominant language for the discipline of linguistics), can be contrary to the public good in less developed countries (LDCs) and emerging speech communities. Linguistics in its current international disciplinary form serves needs different from those of emerging speech communities, where a new language treatment system ought to be created by a new cadre of caretakers of the community's language resources. (Language planning; developing countries; linguistics as an international discipline; English)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1981 , pp. 43 - 52
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

al-Toma, S. J. (1970). Language education in Arab countries and the role of the academies. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current Trends in Linguistics 6: Linguistics in South West Asia and North Africa. The Hague & Paris: Mouton, 690–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reprinted in Fishman, J. A. (ed.), (1974), Advances in Language Planning. The Hague: Mouton, 279–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austerlitz, R. (ed.) (1975). The scope of American linguistics: The first golden anniversary symposium of the Linguistic Society of America. Lisse, The Netherlands: Peter de Ridder Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
British Council. Annual Report 1974–75, 1976–77. London.Google Scholar
Calvet, Louis-Jean (1974). Linguistique et colonialisme. Petit traité de glottophagie. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Center for Applied Linguistics. (1972). University resources in the United States and Canada for the study of linguistics, 7th ed.Google Scholar
Das, Gupta J. (1978). Language planning in India: Authority and organization. In J. Rubin et al., 1977: 57–78.Google Scholar
Dingwall, W. Orr. (ed). (1971). A survey of linguistic science. University of Maryland: Linguistics program. Reprinted (1976). Greylock.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Applications of linguistics. In Austerlitz 1975: 63–75.Google Scholar
Fox, M. J. (1974). Language education in developing countries: The changing role of the Ford Foundation. A Ford Foundation reprint. New York: The Ford Foundation.Google Scholar
Fox, M. J.(1975). Language and development: A retrospective survey of Ford Foundation language projects 1925–1974. New York: The Ford Foundation. Two vols.Google Scholar
Heath, S. B. (1976). A national language academy? Debate in the new nation. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 11: 9–43.Google Scholar
Hurreiz, S. H. (1975). Arabic in the Sudan: Current problems and future needs. Language Planning Newsletter. 1: 4, 1 & 3–4.Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jernudd, Björn H. (1977a) Prerequisites for a model of language treatment. In Rubin et al., 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, Björn H. (1977b). Agency man. In Rubin et al., 131–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, Björn H. (1977c). Three language planning agencies and three Swedish newspapers. In Rubin et al., 143–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jernudd, Björn H. (1977d). The study of language and language problems. In Sprakvitenskapens forhold til samfunnsvitenskapene. Oslo: Norges almenvitenskapelige forskningsrad. 53–75.Google Scholar
Jemudd, Bjöm H, & Garrison, Gary L. (1975). Language treatment in Egypt: Notes. Cairo: The Ford Foundation. Mimeographed.Google Scholar
Kaye, A. S. (1972). Remarks on diglossia in Arabic: Well-defined vs. ill-defined. Linguistics 81: 32–48.Google Scholar
Khubchandani, L. M. (1973). An overview of sociolinguistics. The Sociolinguistics Newsletter 4: 2, 3–8. 27, 30.Google Scholar
Kumar, K. (1979). Indigenization and transnational cooperation in the social sciences. In Kumar, K. (ed), Bonds without bondage: Explorations in transcultural interactions. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii, 103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Language Planning Newsletter. Honolulu: Culture Learning Institute at the East-West Center.Google Scholar
Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mazrui, A. A. (n.d.). The African university as a multinational corporation: Comparative problems of penetration and dependency. Discussion paper no. 95. Institute of Development Studies at the University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Mazrui, A. A.(1975). The political sociology of the English language. An African perspective. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, Jirí V. (1978). Post-structural approaches to language: Language theory in a Japanese context. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Newmark, P. (1976). The theory and the craft of translation. Language teaching and linguistics: Abstracts 9: 1, 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normalstudieplan. 22.4.70. Svenska. Swedish University Chancellery.Google Scholar
Nyt fra Sprognaevnet. Copenhagen: Dansk Sprognaevn.Google Scholar
Rabin, C. (1971). A tentative classification of language-planning aims. In Rubin, J. & Jernudd, Björn H. (eds.), Can language be planned? Sociolinguistic theory and practice for developing, nations. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 277–79.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1967). A short history of linguistics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Roulet, E. (1976). Theóries grammaticales et pédagogie des langues. Language teaching and linguistics: Abstracts 9:4, 197–211.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1976). Introduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 11: 5–7.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1978). The approach to language planning within the United States. Longuage Planning Newsletter. 4: 4, 1 & 3–6.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1979). Directory of language planning organizations. Honolulu: Culture Learning Institute at the East-West Center.Google Scholar
Rubin, J.Jernudd, Björn H.; Gupta, J. Das; Fishman, J. A.; & Ferguson, C. A. (eds.). (1977). Language planning processes. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprakvard. Stockholm: Svenska spraknämnden.Google Scholar
Svenskläraren. Stockholm Svensklärarföreningen.Google Scholar