Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:16:28.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New generalizations and explanations in language and gender research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

PENELOPE ECKERT
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, eckert@csli.stanford.edu
SALLY McCONNELL-GINET
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, smg9@cornell.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gendered linguistic practices emerge as people engage in social practices that construct them not only as girls or boys, women or men – but also as, e.g., Asian American or heterosexually active. Adequate generalizations about gendered language use and explanations of such generalizations require understanding the place of particular linguistic practices in the life of what Lave & Wenger 1991 and Wenger 1998 call a Community of Practice: a group whose joint engagement in some activity or enterprise is sufficiently intensive to give rise over time to a repertoire of shared practices. Eckert's ethnographic/sociolinguistic workin pre-adolescent and adolescent communities of practice illustrates ways in which gender and other aspects of identity are co-constructed. We use these and other sociolinguistic data to suggest some of the many different kinds of generalizations, emerging from studies of language and gender, that look to communities of practice.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press