Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Hall, Geoff
and
Gavins, Joanna
2004.
The year’s work in stylistics 2003.
Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 4,
p.
349.
TAGLIAMONTE, SALI
and
ROBERTS, CHRIS
2005.
SO WEIRD; SO COOL; SO INNOVATIVE: THE USE OF INTENSIFIERS IN THE TELEVISION SERIESFRIENDS.
American Speech,
Vol. 80,
Issue. 3,
p.
280.
D'Arcy, Alex
2005.
The development of linguistic constraints: Phonological innovations in St. John's English.
Language Variation and Change,
Vol. 17,
Issue. 03,
Tagliamonte, Sali
2005.
So who? Like how? Just what?.
Journal of Pragmatics,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 11,
p.
1896.
Naya, Belén Méndez
2006.
Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions of right in the history of English.
Folia Linguistica Historica,
Vol. 40,
Issue. Historica vol. 27,1-2,
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
2006.
“So cool, right?”: Canadian English Entering the 21st Century.
Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique,
Vol. 51,
Issue. 2-3,
p.
309.
Rickford, John R.
Wasow, Thomas
Zwicky, Arnold
and
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2007.
INTENSIVE AND QUOTATIVEALL: SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW.
American Speech,
Vol. 82,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
Roth‐Gordon, Jennifer
2007.
Youth, slang, and pragmatic expressions: Examples from Brazilian Portuguese1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
322.
Naya, Belén Méndez
2007.
Adjunct, modifier, discourse marker: On the various functions ofrightin the history of English.
Folia Linguistica,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
141.
Lalor, Therese
and
Rendle-Short, Johanna
2007.
‘That's So Gay’: A Contemporary Use ofGayin Australian English.
Australian Journal of Linguistics,
Vol. 27,
Issue. 2,
p.
147.
Tagliamonte, Sali A.
and
Denis, Derek
2008.
LINGUISTIC RUIN? LOL! INSTANT MESSAGING AND TEEN LANGUAGE.
American Speech,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 1,
p.
3.
MÉNDEZ-NAYA, BELÉN
2008.
On the history ofdownright.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
267.
Van Herk, Gerard
2008.
THE VERY BIG CLASS PROJECT: COLLABORATIVE LANGUAGE RESEARCH IN LARGE UNDERGRADUATE CLASSES.
American Speech,
Vol. 83,
Issue. 2,
p.
222.
NEVALAINEN, TERTTU
2008.
Social variation in intensifier use: constraint on-lyadverbialization in the past?.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
289.
Barbieri, Federica
2008.
Patterns of age‐based linguistic variation in American English1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
58.
TAGLIAMONTE, SALI A.
2008.
So different and pretty cool! Recycling intensifiers in Toronto, Canada.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
361.
GONZÁLEZ-DÍAZ, VICTORINA
2008.
Recent developments in English intensifiers: the case ofvery much.
English Language and Linguistics,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 2,
p.
221.
Buchstaller, Isabelle
2009.
The Quantitative Analysis of Morphosyntactic Variation: Constructing and Quantifying the Denominator.
Language and Linguistics Compass,
Vol. 3,
Issue. 4,
p.
1010.
Pichler, Heike
2009.
The functional and social reality of discourse variants in a northern English dialect: I DON'T KNOW and I DON'T THINK compared.
Intercultural Pragmatics,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 4,
Pichler, Heike
2010.
Methods in discourse variation analysis: Reflections on the way forward1.
Journal of Sociolinguistics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 5,
p.
581.