Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T21:20:12.111Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms: A research agenda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2021

Mimi Li  and
Meixiu Zhang
Mimi Li*
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University-Commerce, Texas, USA
Meixiu Zhang
Affiliation:
Texas Tech University, Texas, USA
*
*Corresponding author. Email: mimi.li@tamuc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on second language (L2) collaborative writing (CW) has proliferated over the recent decade and will continue to bloom due to the changing landscape of writing and learning in the digital age. This article provides a research agenda on CW in L2 classrooms. We illustrate six research themes for future research inquiry by pointing out the research gap, following a brief review of theoretical frameworks and existing empirical efforts on CW. We then expound on six specific research tasks that we deem to be pressing for this domain to progress, including more attention to multimodal CW, expanded frameworks for analyzing peer interaction and writing products, deployment of underused research techniques and improved research practice, development of CW assessment practice, as well as the inquiry of practitioners’ input on CW. We hope to provide guidance for future research endeavors by identifying avenues of investigations on CW and meanwhile contribute to the trajectory of vibrant research on L2 writing and language learning.

Type
Thinking Allowed
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 94 - 112
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrams, Z. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22–42. https://doi.org/10125/44681Google Scholar
Alegría de la Colina, A., García Mayo, M. P., & García Mayo, M. P. (2007). Attention to form across collaborative tasks by low-proficiency learners in an EFL setting. In García Mayo, M.D.P. (ed), Investigating tasks in formal language learning (pp. 91–116). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Anthony, L. (2015). Tagant (version 1.1.0) [Computer software]. Waseda University. Available from. https://www.laurenceanthony.net/softwareGoogle Scholar
Anton, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1999). Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, N., Ducate, L., & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or cooperation? Analyzing group dynamics and revision processes in wikis. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 431–448. https://doi-org/10.11139/cj.29.3.431-448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydin, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology, 18(1), 160–180. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44359Google Scholar
Belcher, D. D. (2017). On becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38(4), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.10.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Poonpon, K. (2011). Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development? TESOL Quarterly, 45, 5–35. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2011.244483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2014). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu059Google Scholar
Biber, D., Gray, B., Staples, S., & Egbert, J. (2020). Investigating grammatical complexity in L2 English writing research: Linguistic description versus predictive measurement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 46, 100869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2020.100869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bikowski, D., & Vithanage, R. (2016). Effects of web-based collaborative writing on individual L2 writing development. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 79–99. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44447Google Scholar
Bradley, L., Lindström, B., & Rystedt, H. (2020). Rationalities of collaboration for language learning in a wiki. ReCALL, 22(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344010000108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, M., & Swain, M. (2009). Languaging in collaborative writing: Creation of and response to expertise. In Mackey, A. & Polio, C. (Eds.), Multiple perspective on interaction: Second language research in honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 58–89). Routledge.Google Scholar
Chen, W., & Hapgood, S. (2021). Understanding knowledge, participation and learning in L2 collaborative writing: A metacognitive theory perspective. Language Teaching Research, 25(2), 256–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819837560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cho, H. (2017). Synchronous web-based collaborative writing: Factors mediating interaction among second-language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 31–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage.Google Scholar
Damon, W., & Phelps, E. (1989). Critical distinctions among three approaches to peer education. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 9–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(89)90013-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angelo, L. (2010). Creating a framework for the analysis of academic posters. Language Studies Working Papers, 2., 38-50. University of Reading: School of Languages and European Studies. http://www.reading.ac.uk/AcaDepts/ll/app_ling/internal/wpGoogle Scholar
DiCamilla, F., & Antón, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Angelo, L. (2016). Academic posters. A textual and visual metadiscourse analysis. Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1988). Beyond group: A psycholinguistic rationale for collective activity in second language learning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In Lantolf, J. & Appel, G. (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Ablex.Google Scholar
Ducate, L., Anderson, L., & Moreno, N. (2011). Wading through the world of wikis: An analysis of three wiki projects. Foreign Language Annals, 44(3), 495–524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2011.01144.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. (1990). Singular texts/plural authors. Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering L2 development and mastery of writing conventions. Language Learning & Technology, 14(3), 51–71. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44226Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity theoretical approach to developmental research. Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Engeström, Y., Miettinen, R., & Punamäki, R.-L. (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19–38). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A. (2012). Collaborative writing tasks in the L2 classroom: Comparing group, pair, and individual work. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 40–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fernández Dobao, A. (2020). Collaborative writing in mixed classes: What do heritage and second language learners think? Foreign Language Annals, 53(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García Mayo, M. P. (2002). Interaction in advanced EFL pedagogy: A comparison of form-focused activities. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3-4), 323–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00008-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. In Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Dörnyei, Z. (Eds.), AILA review (19): Themes in SLA research (pp. 3–17). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A. (2011). Fostering learner autonomy in English for science: A collaborative digital video project in a technological learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 68–86. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44263Google Scholar
Hafner, C. A., & Ho, W. J. (2020). Assessing digital multimodal composing in second language writing: Towards a process-based model. Journal of Second Language Writing, 47, 100710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirvela, A. (1999). Collaborative writing instruction and communities of readers and writers. TESOL Journal, 8(2), 7–12.Google Scholar
Housen, A., Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (Eds.). (2012). Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (Vol. 32). John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H.-C. (2019). Wiki-mediated collaboration and its association with L2 writing development: An exploratory study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 945–967. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1542407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H.-C., & Lo, Y.-F. (2018). Using wiki-mediated collaboration to foster L2 writing performance. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), 103–123. https://doi.org/10125/44659Google Scholar
Hung, H.-T., Chiu, Y.-C. J., & Yeh, H.-C. (2013). Multimodal assessment of and for learning: A theory-driven design rubric. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 400–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01337.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hyland, K., & Hse, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. D. (2017). Cognitive task complexity and L2 written syntactic complexity, accuracy, lexical complexity, and fluency: A research synthesis and meta-analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 37, 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, W., & Eslami, Z. R. (2021). Effects of computer-mediated collaborative writing on individual EFL writing performance. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1893753Google Scholar
Kessler, G. (2009). Student-initiated attention to form in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 13(1), 79–95. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44169Google Scholar
Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing collaborative autonomous learning abilities in computer mediated language learning: Attention to meaning among students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220903467335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 91–109. http://dx.doi.org/10125/44276Google Scholar
Kim, Y. (2008). The contribution of collaborative and individual tasks to the acquisition of L2 vocabulary. Modern Language Journal, 92(1), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00690.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Y., & McDonough, K. (2011). Using pretask modelling to encourage collaborative learning opportunities. Language Teaching Research, 15(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168810388711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kost, C. (2011). Investigating writing strategies and revision behavior in collaborative wiki projects. CALICO Journal, 28(3), 606–620. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.28.3.606-620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.Google Scholar
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2017). Functional adequacy in L2 writing: Towards a new rating scale. Language Testing, 34(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532216663991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer–reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2010.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Second language learning as a mediated process. Language Teaching, 33, 79–96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444800015329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr134oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lei, L., & Liu, D. (2019). Research trends in applied linguistics from 2005 to 2016: A bibliometric analysis and its implications. Applied Linguistics, 40(3), 540–561. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amy003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leont'ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow. Progress.Google Scholar
Li, M. (2013). Individual novices and collective experts: Collective scaffolding in wiki-based small group writing. System, 41(3), 752–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.07.021CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. (2014). Small group interactions in wiki–based collaborative writing in the EAP context. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of South Florida.Google Scholar
Li, M. (2018). Computer-mediated collaborative writing in L2 contexts: An analysis of empirical research. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 882–904. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1465981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M. (2020). Languaging in wiki-based collaborative writing: Functions and mediating factors. In Storch, N. & Wataru, S. (Eds.), Languaging in language teaching and learning: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 149–169). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, M. (2021). Participation and interaction in wiki-based collaborative writing: An activity theory perspective. In Garcia Mayo, P. (Ed.), Working collaboratively in second/foreign language learning (pp. 227–248). De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Kim, D. (2016). One wiki, two groups: Dynamic interactions across ESL collaborative writing tasks. Journal of Second Language Writing, 31, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Storch, N. (2017). Second language writing in the age of CMC: Affordances, multimodality, and collaboration. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Zhang, M. (under contract). L2 collaborative writing in diverse learning contexts. John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2013). Patterns of computer-mediated interaction in small writing groups using wikis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26(1), 62–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2011.631142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017a). Explaining dynamic interactions in wiki-based collaborative writing. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 96–120. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44613Google Scholar
Li, M., & Zhu, W. (2017b). Good or bad collaborative wiki writing: Exploring links between group interactions and writing products. Journal of Second Language Writing, 35, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.01.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lim, J., & Kessler, M. (in press). Expanding research agendas: SLA, writing, and multimodality. In Manchón, R. M. & Polio, C. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.Google Scholar
Liou, H., & Peng, Z. (2009). Training effects on computer-mediated peer review. System, 37, 514–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–141. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K., Crawford, W., & De Vleeschauwer, J. (2016). Thai EFL learners’ interaction during collaborative writing tasks and its relationship to text quality. In Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 185–208). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.08mcdCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Min, H.-T. (2006). The effects of trained peer response on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohta, A. S. (2000). Re-thinking interaction in SLA: Developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 51–78). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (2014). Promoting foreign language collaborative writing through the use of web 2.0 tools and tasks. In González-Lloret, M. & Ortega, L. (Eds.), Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks (pp. 115–148). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfaff, E., & Huddleston, P. (2003). Doe it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25(1), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475302250571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piezon, S. L., & Donaldson, R. L. (2005). Online groups and social loafing: Understanding student-group interactions. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(4), 1–11. www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/winter84/piezon84.htmGoogle Scholar
Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655–687. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263113000399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polio, C., & Friedman, D. A. (2017). Understanding, evaluating, and conducting second language writing research. Routledge.Google Scholar
Qiu, X., & Lee, M. (2020). Regulated learning and self-efficacy beliefs in peer collaborative writing: An exploratory study of L2 learners’ written products, task discussions, and self-reports. System, 93, 102312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahimi, M., & Fathi, J. (2021). Exploring the impact of wiki-mediated collaborative writing on EFL students’ writing performance, writing self-regulation, and writing self-efficacy: A mixed methods study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1888753Google Scholar
Révész, A., Michel, M., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring second language writers’ pausing and revision behaviours: A mixed methods study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41, 605–631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311900024XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016). A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts. In Sato, M. & Ballinger, S. (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 267–289). John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and students’ perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 286–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2011.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B. (2019). Collaborative multimodal composing: Tracing the unique partnerships of three pairs of adolescents composing across three digital projects. Literacy, 53(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/lit.12153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, B., Pacheco, M., & de Almeida, C. (2017). Mutimodal code-meshing: Bilingual adolescents’ processes composing across modes and languages. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 6–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2008). Metatalk in a pair work activity: Level of engagement and implications for language development. Language Awareness, 17(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410802146644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2012). Collaborative writing as a site for L2 learning in face-to-face and online modes. In Kessler, G., Oskoz, A., & Elola, I. (Eds.), Technology across writing contexts and tasks (pp. 113–129). San Marcos, TX: CALICO.Google Scholar
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847699954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, N., & Knoch, U. (in preparation). Accessing collaborative writing: Product and process. In Li, M.. & Zhang, M. (Eds.), L2 collaborative writing in diverse learning contexts (under contract). John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processes, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing, case studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303–334. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–256). Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 158–164. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.50.1.158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. Modern Language Journal, 82(3), 320–337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb01209.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tardy, C., & Gou, H. (2021). Identifying and analyzing genre-related episodes (GREs) in collaborative writing: A methodological approach. Paper Presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Torres, J., & Cung, B. (2019). A comparison of advanced heritage language learners’ peer interaction across modes and pair types. Modern Language Journal, 103(4), 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. London, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Vandommele, G., Van den Branden, K., Van Gorp, K., & De Maeyer, S. (2017). In-school and out-of-school multimodal writing as an L2 writing resource for beginner learners of Dutch. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.05.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, D., Olson, J., Zhang, J., Nguyen, T., & Olson, G. (2015). Docuvz: Visualizing collaborative writing. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Digital Library. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2702123.2702517Google Scholar
Wang, Y. C. (2014). Using wikis to facilitate interaction and collaboration among EFL learners: A social constructivist approach to language teaching. System, 42, 383–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y. (2008). Peer-peer interaction between L2 learners of different proficiency levels: Their interactions and reflections. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 64(4), 605–663. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.64.4.605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watanabe, Y., & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880607074599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pairs versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity and accuracy. Language Testing, 26(3), 445–466. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wikborg, E. (1990). Types of coherence breaks in Swedish student writing: Misleading paragraph division. In Connor, U. & Johns, A. M. (Eds.), Coherence in writing: Research and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 131–149). TESOL.Google Scholar
Yilmaz, Y. (2011). Task effects on focus on form in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Modern Language Journal, 95(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2010.01143.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zabihi, R., & Bayan, M. (2020). Are two voices better than one? Comparing aspects of text quality and authorial voice in paired and independent L2 writing. Written Communication, 37(4), 512–535. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320939542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. (2018). Collaborative writing in the EFL classroom: The effects of L1 and L2 use. System, 76, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.04.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. (2019a). A re-examination of pair dynamics and L2 learning opportunities in collaborative writing. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819890949Google Scholar
Zhang, M. (2019b). Towards a quantitative model of understanding the dynamics of collaboration in collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 16–30. https://doi.org/j.jslw.2019.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M. (2021). Understanding L1 and L2 interaction in collaborative writing: A lexico-grammatical analysis. Language Teaching Research, 25(3), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819859911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M., Akoto, M., & Li, M. (2021). Digital multimodal composing in post-secondary l2 settings: A review of the empirical landscape. Computer Assisted Language Learning, online first. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1942068Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Chen, W. (under review). Exploring the effects of assessment approaches in synchronous computer-mediated collaborative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2022 Special Issue on L2 writing assessment in the digital age.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., Gibbons, J., & Li, M. (2021). Empirical research in computer-mediated collaborative writing: A systematic review. Paper presented at American Association of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Zhang, M., & Plonsky, L. (2020). Collaborative writing in face-to-face settings: A substantive and methodological review. Journal of Second Language Writing, 49, 100753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, Y., Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2021). Implementing collaborative writing in Chinese EFL classrooms: Voices from tertiary teachers. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.631561Google ScholarPubMed
Zhu, W. (1995). Effects of training for peer response on students’ comments and interaction. Written Communication, 12, 492–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088395012004004CrossRefGoogle Scholar