Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-q6k6v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T08:02:10.162Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ESP – English for Specific Purposes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Bernard Coffey
Bernard Coffey
Affiliation:
The British Council, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This article is an updating of the ESP survey written by Professor Peter Strevens for Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, Vol. 10, No. 3 of July 1977. The account given there of ESP's definitions, antecedents, theoretical bases and methodology has not been rendered obsolete by the passage of six years, and it remains a definitive statement. What is new in the present article refers to output and events since 1977, and also, with a greater or lesser degree of tentativeness, to the development of trends – especially those which may indicate that ESP is moving into a pre-final phase, or which hint at new directions for research and development. This article also owes a considerable debt to other overviews of ESP that have appeared since 1977, and particularly to the work of Pauline C. Robinson (1980), of the University of Reading's Centre for Applied Language Studies.

Type
State-of-the-Art Article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 2 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J. P. B. (1975). English, science and language teaching. Edutec, 9.Google Scholar
Bell, R. (1981). Notional syllabus: to grade or not to grade? In Richards, D. R. (ed), RELC Occasional Paper. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
Bowers, R. (1979). ESP at the University of Damascus. British Council report.Google Scholar
BP Publications. North Sea Challenge.Google Scholar
Bradford, A. (1977). Report on the English Language Teaching Project in English for Science and Technology, King Mongkut Institute of Technology, 1976–8. Thailand: British Council.Google Scholar
British Council (1978). ESP Course Design. Dunford House Seminar Report. London: British Council.Google Scholar
British Council (1980). The University of Malaya English for Special Purposes Project. ELT Documents, 107.Google Scholar
British Council (1982). Report on ESP Teaching in Britain. Restricted.Google Scholar
British Council and University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1982). English Language Testing Service: User's Handbook. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar
British Council and University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate (1982). English Language Testing Service: First Annual Report. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate.Google Scholar
British Council (1983). Guide to TEFL/TESL Academic Courses in the United Kingdom, 1983/4. London: British Council.Google Scholar
British Council. Report on the Working Parties, Computerised ESP and Discourse Analysis Bibliography. Not generally available.Google Scholar
Brumfit, C.(1978). Reviewof Munby, J. L., Communicative syllabus design. Times Educational Supplement, 11 08.Google Scholar
Candlin, C. N. (ed. and translator) (1981). The communicative teaching of English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Carroll, B. J. (1980). Testing communicative performance. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Chaplen, E. F. (1983) Advantages and Disadvantages of the Team Approach in Developing and Teaching an ESP Programme. In English for Specific Purposes, 77. Oregon State University.Google Scholar
Coffey, B. (1978). ESP seminar in Manila. British Council paper.Google Scholar
Coffey, B. (1982). ESP 1982. Sprache und Beruft.Google Scholar
Cooper, M. D. (1975). Report on the UMESP. In 11th SEAMEO RELC Seminar Report. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar
Di, Federico L. H. (ed.) (1982). Testing English for Academic Purposes. Papers from seminar held at Bergamo, 1981. Camerino: Instituto di Studi Linguistici dell' università degli studi di Camerino.Google Scholar
Dudley, Evans (general ed.). Nucleus Series. Longman.Google Scholar
Early, P. (1979). Beyond Munby and into the gap. In Dunford Papers in ELT Course Design. London: British Council.Google Scholar
ELC, King Abdul Aziz University. Task-based learning. ELC Handbook No. 2.Google Scholar
English in Focus. Eds. Allen, JPB & Widd, . (1974–1978). Textbook Series, OUP.Google Scholar
Ewer, J. R. & Latorre, G. (1967). Preparing an English course for students of science. ELT Journal, 21, 221–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewer, J. R. & Latorre, G. (1969). A course in basic scientific English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Henner-Stanchina, , (1975). Autonomous learning as a strategy for adult education. IUT Bulletin Pédagogique.Google Scholar
Jones, K. (1974). The role of discourse analysis in devising undergraduate reading programmes in EST. London: British Council (English Teaching Information Unit).Google Scholar
Jones, K. & Roe, P. (1975). Designing English for Science and Technology. In English for Academic Purposes. London: British Council.Google Scholar
McCafferty, J. (1982). Unpublished British Council monograph. A consideration of a self-access approach to the learning of English.Google Scholar
Mackay, R. & Mountford, A. (eds.) (1978). English for Specific Purposes. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ministry of Education, Malaysia (1976). Experimental notions-bssed primary syllabus. Kuala Lumpur.Google Scholar
Mountford, A. The project approach to curriculum development. Unpublished British Council paper.Google Scholar
Munby, J. (1978). Communicative syllabus design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
O'Brien, T. (1978). Nucleus, Medicine. Longman.Google Scholar
Porter, D. (1976). Scientific English: an oversight in stylistics? Studia Anglica Posnaniensa, 8, 77–87.Google Scholar
Prabhu, N. S. (1983). Procedural syllabuses. Paper presented at the 18th Regional Seminar of the SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, Singapore.Google Scholar
Ramsden, C. (1979). A discourse model for Munby's ‘Specification of communicative competence’. In Dunford Papers in ELT Course Design. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Richterich, R. & Chancerel, J.-L. (1978). Identifying the needs of adults learning a foreign language. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Republished by Pergamon, 1980.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. C. (1980). ESP (English for Specific Purposes). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Selinker, L. & others (1972). Working papers in English for Science and Technology. Seattle: University of Washington.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. (1975). Report on the UMESP. In ELT Documents, 75/3.Google Scholar
Smith, J. & Coffey, B. (1982). English for Study Purposes. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Spencer, J. (1972). Languages for special purposes: teaching rules or learning roles? In Modern Language Teaching to Adults: Language for Special Purposes (2nd AIMAV Seminar. Brussels: AIMAV and Paris: Didier).Google Scholar
Strevens, P. (1977). Special purpose language learning: a perspective. Language Teaching and Linguistics: Abstracts, 10, 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, P. (1979). English Language Centres (Paper).Google Scholar
Thakur, D. (1965). A stylistic description of four restricted uses of English in Science. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Trimble, L. & Trimble, M. T. (1977). The Development of EFL Materials for Occupational English. British Council.Google Scholar
van, Ek J. A. & Alexander, L. G. (1975). Threshold-level English. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. Republished by Pergamon, 1980.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1975). EST in theory and practice. In English for Academic Purposes. London: British Council, ETIC Occasional Paper.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. (1976). The authenticity of language data. In On TESOL '76. Washington, DC: TESOL.Google Scholar
Widdowson, H. G. & Allen, J. P. B. (1975). English in Physical Science. OUP (Focus volume).Google Scholar
Willis, D. (1979). Analysing students' needs. London: British Council.Google Scholar
Wilkins, D. (1976). Notional syllabuses. London: Oxford Univeristy Press.Google Scholar
Willis, D. (1983). Task-oriented learning. Paper given at SEAMEO RELC 18th Regional Seminar. Singapore: RELC.Google Scholar