Abu-Haidar, Farida (1989). Are Iraqi women more prestige-conscious than men? Sex differentiation in Baghdadi Arabic. Language in Society, 18, 4, 471–81.Google Scholar

Aries, Elizabeth J. (1976). Interaction patterns and themes of male, female and mixed groups. Small Group Behaviour, 7, 1, 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aries, Elizabeth J. (1987). Gender and communication. In Shaver, Phillip & Hendrick, Clyde (eds.), Sex and gender, 149–76. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Aries, Elizabeth J. & Johnson, Fern L. (1983). Close friendship in adulthood: conversational content between same-sex friends. Sex Roles, 9, 12, 1183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Paddy (1990). Politeness revisited: the dark side. In Bell, Allan & Holmes, Janet (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 276–93. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Bailey, Lee Ann & Timm, Lenora (1976). More on women's – and men's – expletives. Anthropological Linguistics, 18, 438–49.Google Scholar

Baron, Dennis E. (1986). Grammar and gender. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar

Bartlett, Chris (1988). Male/female colour discrimination. Occasional Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1, 1–8. Christchurch: Department of English Language and Literature, University of Canterbury.Google Scholar

Bashiruddin, Ayesha, Edge, Julian & Hughes-Pélégrin, Elizabeth (1990). Who speaks in seminars? Status, culture and gender at Durham University. In Clark, Romy, Fairclough, Norman, Ivanic, Roz, McLeod, Nicki, Thomas, Jenny & Meara, Paul (eds.), Language and power, 74–84. London: Centre for Information on Language Teaching.Google Scholar

Baumann, Marie, (1979). Two features of ‘women's speech’. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 32–40.Google Scholar

Bayard, Donn (1986). Class and change in New Zealand English: a summary report. Te Reo, 30, 3–36.Google Scholar

Bayard, Donn (1981). Antipodean accents and the ‘cultural cringe’. Te Reo, 35 (in press).Google Scholar

Beattie, Geoffrey W. (1981). Interruption in conversational interaction and its relation to the sex and status of the interactants. Linguistics, 19, 15–35.Google Scholar

Becker, Judith A. & Smenner, Patricia C. (1986). The spontaneous use of ‘thank you’ by pre-schoolers as a function of sex, socioeconomic status, and listener status. Language in Society, 15, 4, 537–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bellinger, David C. & Gleason, Jean Berko (1982). Sex differences in parental directives to young children. Sex Roles, 8, 11, 1123–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bilous, Frances R. & Krauss, Robert M. (1988). Dominance and accommodation in the conversational behaviours of same- and mixed-gender dyads. Language and Communication, 8, 3/4, 183–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blaubergs, Maija S. (1980). An analysis of classic arguments against changing sexist language. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blewitt, L. (1988). Metaphor and conflict in feminist organizations. Women and Language, 11, 1, 40–43.Google Scholar

Bodine, Anne (1975 a). Sex differentiation in language. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 130–51.Google Scholar

Bodine, Anne (1975 b). Andocentrism in prescriptive grammar. Language in Society, 4, 2, 129–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boe, S. Kathryn (1987). Language as an expression of caring in women. Anthropological Linguistics, 29, 3, 271–85.Google Scholar

Bradac, James J. & Mulac, Anthony (1984). A molecular view of powerful and powerless speech styles. Communication Monographs, 51, 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brooks, Virginia R. (1982). Sex differences in student dominance behaviour in female and male professors' classrooms. Sex Roles, 8, 683–90.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Dédé (1982). The influence of the addressee's sex on politeness in language use. Linguistics, 20, 1/2, 697–711.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Dédé & De Haan, Dorian (eds) (1987). Women's language, socialisation and self-image. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar

Brouwer, Dédé, Gerritsen, Marinel & De Haan, Dorian (1979). Speech differences between women and men: on the wrong track? Language in Society, 8, 1, 33–50.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope (1980). Why and how are women more polite? In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 111–36.Google Scholar

Brown, Penelope (1990). Gender, politeness and confrontation in Tenejapa. Discourse Processes, 13, 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, Penelope & Levinson, Stephen (1978). Universals in language usage: politeness phenomena. In Goody, Esther N. (ed.), Questions and politeness, 56–310. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah (1985). Feminism and linguistic theory. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cameron, Deborah (1988). Introduction. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 3–12.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah & Coates, Jennifer (1988). Some problems in the sociolinguistic explanation of sex differences. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 13–26.Google Scholar

Cameron, Deborah, McAlinden, Fiona & O'Leary, Kathy (1988). Lakoff in context. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 74–93.Google Scholar

Cannon, G. & Robertson, S. (1985). Sexism in present-day English: is it diminishing? Word, 36, 1, 23–35.Google Scholar

Cheshire, Jenny (1982). Variation in an English dialect: a sociolinguistic study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer (1986). Women, men and language. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer (1988). Gossip revisited: language in all-female groups. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 94–122.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer & Cameron, Deborah (eds.) (1988). Women in their speech communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Cooper, Robert L. (1984). The avoidance of androcentric generics. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 50, 5–20.Google Scholar

Crawford, Mary & English, Linda (1984). Generic versus specific inclusion of women in language: effects on recall. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 13, 5, 373–81.Google Scholar

Crosby, Faye & Nyquist, Linda (1977). The female register: an empirical study of Lakoffs hypotheses. Language in Society, 6, 3, 313–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Das, Sisir Kumar (1968). Forms of address and terms of reference in Bengali. Anthropological Linguistics, 10, 4, 19–30.Google Scholar

Deuchar, Margaret (1988). A pragmatic account of women's use of standard speech. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 27–32.Google Scholar

Dindia, Kathryn (1987). The effects of sex of subject and sex of partner on interruptions. Human Communication Research, 13, 3, 345–71.Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (1975). The question of tag questions in women's speech: they don't really use more of them, do they? Language in Society, 4, 289–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (eds.) (1978). American minority women in sociolinguistic perspective. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 17.Google Scholar

Dubois, Betty Lou & Crouch, Isobel M. (eds.) (1979). The sociology of the languages of American women. San Antonio, Texas: Trinity University Press.Google Scholar

Eakins, Barbara & Eakins, Gene (1978). Sex differences in human communication. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Eakins, Barbara & Eakins, Gene (1979). Verbal turn-taking and exchanges in faculty dialogue. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 53–62.Google Scholar

Eckert, Penelope (1990). Cooperative competition in adolescent ‘girl talk’. Discourse Processes, 13, 91–122.Google Scholar

Edelsky, Carole (1977). Acquisition of an aspect of communicative competence: learning what it means to talk like a lady. In Ervin-Tripp, Susan & Mitchell-Kernan, Claudia (eds.), Child discourse, 225–43. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Edelsky, Carole (1981). Who's got the floor? Language in Society, 10, 383–421.Google Scholar

Edwards, Viv (1986). Language in a Black community. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Edwards, Viv (1988). The speech of British Black women in Dudley, West Midlands. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 33–50.Google Scholar

Edwards, Walter F. (1979). Speech acts in Guyana: communicating ritual and personal insults. Journal of Black Studies, 10, 1, 20–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Eisikovits, Edina (1989). Girl-talk/boy-talk: sex differences in adolescent speech. In Collins, Peter & Blair, David (eds.), Australian English, 35–54. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar

Elyan, O., Smith, Philip, Giles, Howard & Bourhis, Richard (1978). R.P-accented female speech: the voice of perceived androgyny? In Trudgill, Peter (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English, 122–31. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Erickson, Bonnie, Lind, E. Allan, Johnson, Bruce C. & O'Barr, William (1978). Speech style and impression formation in a court setting. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 266–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Esposrro, Anita (1979). Sex differences in children's conversation. Language and Speech, 22, 213–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fischer, John L. (1958). Social influences on the choice of a linguistic variant. Word, 14, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fishman, Pamela M. (1980). Conversational insecurity. In Howard Giles, W. Peter Robinson, & Phillip M. Smith (eds.), 127–132.Google Scholar

Fishman, Pamela M. (1983). Interaction: the work women do. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 89–101.Google Scholar

Folb, Edith A. (1980). Runnin' down some lines: the language and culture of black teenagers. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Foote, Russell & Woodward, Jack (1973). A preliminary investigation of obscene language. The Journal of Psychology 83, 263–75.Google Scholar

Frank, Francine & Anshen, Frank (1983). Language and the sexes. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Garcia, Gilbert Narro & Frosch, Susan F. (1976). Sex, color and money: who's perceiving what? In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 63–71.Google Scholar

Gardner, Carol Brooks (1984). Passing by: street remarks, address rights, and the urban female. In Baugh, John & Sherzer, Joel L. (eds.), Language in use: reading in sociolinguistics, 148–64. Englewood Cliffs N.J.: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Gass, Silvia M. & Varonis, Evangeline M. (1985). Sex differences in NNS/NNS interactions. In Day, D. (ed.), Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard, Robinson, W. Peter & Smith, Philip M. (eds.) Language: social psychological perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard, Smith, Philip, Browne, M., Whiteman, C. & Williams, J. A. (1980). Women's speech: the voice of feminism. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 150–6.Google Scholar

Giles, Howard, Smith, Philip, Ford, B., Condor, S. & Thakerar, J. (1980). Speech styles and the fluctuating salience of sex. Language Sciences, 2, 260–82.Google Scholar

Gilligan, Carol (1982). In a different voice. London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Gleason, Jean Berko (1987). Sex differences in parent-child interaction. In Susan U, Philips, Susan Steele, & Christine Tanz (eds.), 189–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1980). Directive-response speech sequences in girls' and boys' task activities. In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 157–73.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1988). Cooperation and competition across girls' and boys' task activities. In Alexandra D. Todd & Sue Fisher (eds.), 55–94.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. (1990). Tactical uses of stories: participation frameworks within girls' and boys' disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 33–71.Google Scholar

Goodwin, Marjorie H. & Goodwin, Charles (1987). Children's arguing. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 200–48.Google Scholar

Graddol, David & Swann, Joan (1989). Gender voices. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Greif, Esther B. (1980). Sex differences in parent-child interaction. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 253–8.Google Scholar

Gupta, A. F. & Lee, Su Yin (1991). Gender representation in English language textbooks used in the Singapore primary schools. Language and Education, 4 (in press).Google Scholar

Haas, Adelaide (1979). The acquisition of genderlect. In Judith Orasanu, Mariam K. Slater & Leonore Loeb Adler (eds.), Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences: Language, sex and gender, 327, 101–13.Google Scholar

Haas, Adelaide & Sherman, Mark A. (1982). Reported topics of conversation among same-sex adults. Communication Quarterly, 30, 4, 332–42.Google Scholar

Haas, Mary (1944). Men's and women's speech in Koasati. Language, 20, 147–9.Google Scholar

Halaby, R. & Long, D. (1979). Future shout: name calling in the future. Maledicta: The International Journal of Verbal Aggression, 3, 61–8.Google Scholar

HartfordBeverley, S. Beverley, S. (1979). Phonological differences in the English of adolescent Chicanas and Chicanos. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds), 73–80.Google Scholar

Hartman, Maryann (1979). A descriptive study of the language of men and women born in Maine around 1900. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 81–90.Google Scholar

Hartman, Pat L. & Judd, Elliot L. (1978). Sexism and TESOL materials. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 383–93.Google Scholar

Hellinger, Marlis (1980). ‘For men must work and women must weep’: sexism in English language text books used in German schools. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 267–75.Google Scholar

Henley, Nancy M. & Kramarae, Cheris (1991). Gender, power and miscommunication. In Coupland, Nikolas, Giles, Howard & Wiemann, John W. (eds.), ‘Mis-communication’ and problematic talk, 18–43. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Herbert, Robert K. (1990). Sex-based differences in compliment behaviour. Language in Society, 19, 201–24.Google Scholar

Hiatt, Mary (1977). The way women write. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Hill, Alette O. (1986). Mother tongue, father time: a decade of linguistic revolt. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Hill, Jane H. (1987). Women's speech in modern Mexicano. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 121–60.Google Scholar

Hiller, U. (1985). Some sex-related differences in the use of spontaneous speech. Linguistic Agency University of Duisburg Papers, Series B, 140.Google Scholar

Hirschman, Lynette (1974). Analysis of supportive and assertive behaviour in conversations. Paper given at meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1984 a). ‘Women's language,: a functional approach. General Linguistics, 24, 3, 149–78.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1984 b). Hedging your bets and sitting on the fence: some evidence for hedges as support structures. Te Reo, 27, 47–62.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1985). Sex differences and miscommunication: some data from New Zealand. In Pride, John B. (ed.), Cross-cultural encounters: communication and miscommunication, 24–43. Melbourne: River Seine.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1986). Functions of you know in women and men's speech. Language in Society, 15, 1, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1987). Sex differences and language use in the ESL classroom. In Das, B. K. (ed.), Communication and learning in the classroom community, 5–36. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional English Language Centre.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1988 a). Of course: a pragmatic particle in New Zealand women's and men's speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 8, 49–74.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1988 b). Sort of in New Zealand women's and men's speech. Studia Linguistica, 42, 2, 85–121.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1988 c). Sex differences in seminar contributions. BAAL Newsletter, 31, 33–41.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1988 d). Paying compliments: a sex-preferential positive politeness strategy. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 3, 445–65.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1989 a). Stirring up the dust: the importance of sex as a variable in the ESL classroom. Proceedings of the ATESOL 6th Summer School, Sydney, 1, 4–39.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1989 b). Is sex relevant in the ESL classroom? Language Issues, 3, 1, 14–18.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1989 c). Sex differences and apologies: one aspect of communicative competence. Applied Linguistics, 10, 2, 194–213.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet (1990). Politeness strategies in New Zealand women's speech. In Bell, Allan & Holmes, Janet (eds.), New Zealand ways of speaking English, 252–76. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Holmes, Janet, Bell, Allan & Boyce, Mary (1991). Variation and change in New Zealand English: a social dialect investigation. Project Report to the Social Sciences Committee of the Foundation for Research, Science and Technology. Wellington: Victoria University.Google Scholar

Holmquist, Jonathan C. (1985). Social correlates of a linguistic variable: a study in a Spanish village. Language in Society, 14, 2, 191–203.Google Scholar

Holt, Vivienne (1988). How New Zealand newspapers name people. Occasional Papers in Language and Linguistics, 1, 9–18.Google Scholar

Horvath, Barbara (1985). Variation in Australian English: the sociolects of Sydney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hughes, Diana & Casey, Patricia (1986). Pronoun choice for gender-unspecified agent words: developmental differences. Language and Speech, 29, 1, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Humphrey, C. (1978). Women, taboo and the suppression of attention. In Ardener, S. (ed.) Defining females: the nature of women in society, 89–108. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In Gladwin, T. & Sturtevant, W. C. (eds.), Anthropology and human behaviour, 13–53. Washington, D.C.: Anthropological Society of Washington.Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Ide, Sachiko (1982). Japanese sociolinguistics, politeness and women's language. Lingua, 57, 357–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ide, Sachiko, Hori, Motoko, Kawasaki, Akiko, Ikuta, Shoko & Haga, Hitomi (1986). Sex difference and politeness in Japanese. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 58, 25–36.Google Scholar

Jahangiri, N. & Hudson, Richard A. (1982). Patterns of variation in Tehrani Persian. In Suzanne Romaine (ed), 49–63.Google Scholar

Jaworki, A. (1983). Sexism in textbooks. British Journal of Language Teaching 21, 2.Google Scholar

Jennings, Kay D. & Suwalsky, Joan T. D. (1982). Reciprocity in the dyadic play of three-year-old children. In Loy, John (ed.), The paradoxes of play, 130–140. West Point, NY: Leisure Press.Google Scholar

Jespersen, Otto (1922). Language: its nature, development and origin. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Johnson, Janet L. (1980). Questions and role responsibility in four professional meetings. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 66–76.Google Scholar

Jones, Deborah (1980). Gossip: notes on women's oral culture. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 193–6.Google Scholar

Judd, Elliot L. (1983). The problem of applying sociolinguistic findings to TESOL: the case of male/female language. In Wolfson, Nessa & Judd, Elliot (eds.), Sociolinguistics and language acquisition, 234–41. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Kalçik, Susan (1975). ‘…like Ann's gynaecologist or the time I was almost raped’ – personal narratives in women's rap groups. Journal of American Folklore, 88, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Karp, David A. & Yoels, William C. (1976). The college classroom: some observations on the meanings of student participation. Sociology and Social Research, 60, 421–39.Google Scholar

Keenan, Elinor (1974). Norm-makers, norm-breakers: uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community. In Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 125–43. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Kemper, Susan (1984). When to speak like a lady. Sex Roles, 10, 5/6, 435–43.Google Scholar

Kenkel, William F. (1963). Observational studies of husband–wife interaction in family decision-making. In Sussman, Marvin (ed.), Sourcebook in marriage and the family, 144–56. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

Kennedy, Carol W. & Camden, Carl T. (1983). A new look at interruptions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 1, 45–58.Google Scholar

Key, Mary Ritchie (1975). Male–female language. Metuchen, New Jersey: Scarecrow Press.Google Scholar

Khosroshahi, Fatemeh (1989). Penguins don't care, but women do: a social identity analysis of a Whorfian problem. Language in Society, 18, 4, 505–25.Google Scholar

Kiper, Pamela S. (1987). Gender and topic. Language in Society, 16, 4, 543–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kissling, Elizabeth A. & Kramarae, Cheris (1990). Stranger compliments: the interpretation of street remarks. Women's Studies in Communication (in press).Google Scholar

Klann-Delius, Gisela (1981). Sex and language acquisition. Is there any influence ? Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 1–25.Google Scholar

Koike, Dale A. (1986). Differences and similarities in men's and women's directives in Carioca Brazilian Portuguese. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Kramer, Cheris (1975). Sex-related differences in address systems. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 5, 198–210.Google Scholar

Kramer, Cheris (1977). Perceptions of female and male speech. Language and Speech, 20, 151–61.Google Scholar

Kramer, Cheris (1978). Women's and men's ratings of their own and ideal speech. Communication Quarterly, 26, 2, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kramarae, Cheris (ed.) (1980). The voices and words of women and men. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Kramarae, Cheris (1981). Women and men speaking. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Kramarae, Cheris (1982). Gender: how she speaks. In Ryan, Ellen Bouchard & Giles, Howard (eds.), Attitudes towards language variation, 84–98. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Kramarae, Cheris (in press). Harassment and everyday life. In Rakow, Lana (ed.), Women making meaning. New York: Harper.Google Scholar

Kramarae, Cheris, Schulz, Muriel & O'Barr, William M. (eds) (1984). Language and power. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Kuiper, Koenraad (1991). Sporting formulae in New Zealand English; two models of male solidarity. In Cheshire, Jenny (ed.), English around the world: sociolinguistic perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar

Labov, William (1972 a). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Labov, William (1972 b). Language in the inner city: studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, George (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1973). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2, 1, 45–80.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1975). Language and woman's place. New York: Harper Colophon.Google Scholar

Lakoff, Robin (1977). Women's language. Language and Style, 10, 4, 222–48.Google Scholar

Lapadat, Judy & Seesahai, Maureen (1977). Male versus female codes in informal contexts. Sociolinguistics Newsletter, 8, 3, 7–8.Google Scholar

Leet-Pellegrini, Helena M. (1980). Conversational dominance as a function of gender and expertise. In Howard Giles, Peter Robinson & Philip Smith (eds.), 97–104.Google Scholar

Lind, E. Allan & O'Barr, William (1979). The social significance of speech in the courtroom. In Giles, Howard & St Clair, Robert N. (eds.), Language and social psychology, 145–57. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar

Lippi-Green, Rosina L. (1989). Social network integration and language change in progress in a rural alpine village. Language in Society, 18, 2, 213–34.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. (1977). Language, social class and education. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Macaulay, Ronald K. (1978). The myth of female superiority in language. Journal of Child Language, 5, 353–63.Google Scholar

MaccobyEleanor, E. Eleanor, E. & Jacklin, Carol N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

MacKay, Donald G. (1980). Language, thought and social attitudes. In Howard Giles, W. Peter Robinson & Philip M. Smith (eds.), 89–96.Google Scholar

MacKay, Donald G. (1982). A reply to Pateman on singular ‘they’. Language in Society, 11, 437–8.Google Scholar

MacKay, Donald G. (1983). Prescriptive grammar and the pronoun problem. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 38–53.Google Scholar

Maltz, Daniel N. & Borker, Ruth A. (1982). A cultural approach to male–female miscommunication. In Gumperz, John J. (ed.), Langauge and social identity, 196–216. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McConnell-Ginet, Sally, Borker, Ruth & Furman, Nelly (eds.) (1980). Women and language in literature and society. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

McMillan, Julie R., Clifton, A. Kay, Mcgrath, Diane & Gale, Wanda S. (1977). Women's language: uncertainty or interpersonal sensitivity and emotionality? Sex Roles, 3, 6, 545–59.Google Scholar

Medicine, Bea (1987). The role of American Indian women in cultural continuity and transition. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), 159–66.Google Scholar

Meditch, Andrea (1975). The development of sex-specific speech patterns in young children. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 421–33.Google Scholar

Mey, Jacob L. (1984). Whose language: a study in the pragmatics of language use. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Meyerhoff, Miriam (1987). A review of sex and language research in New Zealand. In Anne Pauwels (ed.), 32–44.Google Scholar

MilánWilliam, G. William, G. (1976). The influence of the sex and age factors in the selection of polite expressions: a sample from Puerto Rican Spanish. Bilingual Review, 3, 2, 99–121.Google Scholar

Miller, Casey & Swift, Kate (1976). Words and women. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Miller, Casey & Swift, Kate (1980). The handbook of non-sexist writing. London: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley (1980). Language and social network. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley (1982). Social network and linguistic focusing. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 141–52.Google Scholar

Milroy, Lesley (1989). Gender as a speaker variable: the interesting case of the glottalised stops in Tyneside. York Papers in Linguistics, 13, 227–36.Google Scholar

Mulac, Anthony, Wiemann, John M., Widenmann, Sally J. & Gibson, Toni W. (1988). Male/female language differences and effects in same sex and mixed-sex dyads: the genderlinked language effect. Communication Monographs, 55, 4, 315–35.Google Scholar

Murray, Stephen O. & Covelli, Lucille H. (1988). Women and men speaking at the same time. Journal of Pragmatics, 12, 103–11.Google Scholar

Natale, M., Entin, E. & Jaffe, J. (1979). Vocal interruptions in dyadic communication as a function of speech and social anxiety. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 865–78.Google Scholar

Newcombe, Nora & Arnkoff, Diane (1979). Effects of speech style and sex of speaker on person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1293–303.Google Scholar

Nichols, Patricia C. (1978). Black women in the rural South: conservative or innovative. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 45–54.Google Scholar

Nichols, Patricia C. (1983). Linguistic options and choices for black women in the rural South. In Barrie Thome, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (eds.), 54–68.Google Scholar

Nichols, Patricia C. (1984). Networks and hierarchies: language and social stratification. In Cheris Kramarae, Muriel Schulz & William O'Barr (eds.), 23–42.Google Scholar

Nilsen, Alleen Pace (1972). Sexism in English: a feminist view. In Hoffman, Nancy, Secor, Cynthia & Tinsley, Adrian (eds.), Female Studies VI, 102–9. Old Westbury, NY: Feminist Press.Google Scholar

Nilsen, Alleen Pace (1984). Greetings and salutations in a new age. Language in Society, 13, 245–47.Google Scholar

O'Barr, William M. & Atkins, Bowman K. (1980). ‘Women's language’ or ‘powerless language’? In Sally McConnell- Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 93–110.Google Scholar

Ochs, Elinor (1987). The impact of stratification and socialization on men's and women's speech in Western Samoa. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 50–70.Google Scholar

Octigan, Mary & Miederman, Sharon (1979). Male dominance in conversations,. Frontiers, 4, 1, 50–4.Google Scholar

Oliver, Marion M. & Rubin, Joan (1975). The use of expletives by some American women. Anthropological Linguistics, 17, 192–7.Google Scholar

Östman, Jan-Ola (1981). ‘Yon know’: a discourse-functional approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins B.V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pateman, Trevor (1980). MacKay on singular ‘they’. Language in Society, 9, 349–67.Google Scholar

Pauwels, Anne (1987). Language in transition: a study of the title ‘Ms’ in contemporary Australian society. In Anne Pauwels (ed.), 129–54.Google Scholar

Pauwels, Anne (ed.) (1987). Women and language in Australian and New Zealand society. Sydney: Australian Professional Publications.Google Scholar

Penelope, J. (1986). Heteropatriarchal semantics: just two kinds of people in the world. Lesbian Ethics, 2, 58–80.Google Scholar

Penfield, Joyce (ed.) (1987). Women and language in transition. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Petyt, Keith M. (1985). Dialect and accent in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Philips, Susan U. (1980). Sex differences and language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 9, 523–44.Google Scholar

Philips, Susan U. (1987). Introduction: the interaction of social and biological processes in women's and men's speech. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 1–11.Google Scholar

Philips, Susan U., Steele, Susan & Tanz, Christine (eds.) (1987). Language, gender and sex in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poynton, Cate (1989). Language and gender: making the difference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Preisler, Bent (1986). Linguistic sex roles in conversation. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Rayfield, J. R. (1976). Maria in Markham Street: Italian immigrants and language learning in Toronto. Ethnic Croups 1, 2, 133–50.Google Scholar

Redlinger, Wendy (1978). Mother's speech to children in bilingual Mexican-American homes. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel Crouch (eds.), 73–82.Google Scholar

Roger, Derek & Nesshoever, Willfried (1987). Individual differences in dyadic conversational strategies: a further study. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 247–55.Google Scholar

Romaine, Suzanne (ed.) (1982). Sociolinguistic variation in speech communities. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Rosaldo, M. & Lamphere, L. (eds.) (1974). Women, culture and society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Russell, Joan (1982). Networks and sociolinguistic variation in an African urban setting. In Suzanne Romaine (ed.), 141–52.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jacqueline (1975). Cues to identification of sex in children's speech. In Barrie Thome & Nancy Henley (eds.), 152–71.Google Scholar

Sachs, Jacqueline (1987). Preschool boys' and girls' language use in pretend play. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 178–88.Google Scholar

Safilios-Rothschild, Constantina (1979). Sex role, socialisation and sex discrimination: a synthesis and critique of the literature. Washington D.C.: National Institute of Education.Google Scholar

Sankoff, Gillian (1975). A quantitative paradigm for the study of communicative competence. In Bauman, Richard & Sherzer, Joel (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking, 18–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schatz, Henriette (1986). Plat Amsterdams in its social context. Amsterdam: P. J. Meerten-Institut voor Dialectologie, Volkskunde en Naamkunde.Google Scholar

Schick Case, Susan (1988). Cultural differences, not deficiencies: an analysis of managerial women's language. In Rose, Suzanna & Larwood, Laurie (eds.), Women's careers: pathways and pitfalls, 41–63. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Schieffelin, Bambi B. (1987). Do different worlds mean different words?: an example from Papua New Guinea. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 249–60.Google Scholar

Schneider, J. W. & Hacker, S. L. (1973). Sex role imagery and the use of the generic ‘man’ in introductory texts. The American Sociologist, 8, 1, 12–18.Google Scholar

Schulz, Muriel R. (1975). The semantic derogation of woman. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 64–75.Google Scholar

Scott, Kathryn P. (1980). Perceptions of communication competence: what's good for the goose is not good for the gander. In Cheris Kramarae (ed.), 199–208.Google Scholar

Sheldon, Amy (1990). Pickle fights: gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31.Google Scholar

Sherzer, Joel (1987). A diversity of voices: men's and women's speech in ethnographic perspective. In Susan U. Philips, Susan Steele & Christine Tanz (eds.), 95–120.Google Scholar

Shibamoto, Janet S. (1985). Japanese women's language. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Shimanoff, Susan B. (1977). Investigating politeness. In Keenan, Elinor O. & Bennet, Dina (eds.), Discourse across time and space, 213–41. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar

Shuy, Roger W., Wolfram, Walter A. & Riley, William K. (1967). Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. Cooperative Research Project No. 6–1347. Washington D.C.: Office of Education.Google Scholar

Smith, Philip M. (1985). Language, the sexes and society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. (1988). Women and politeness: the Javanese example. Language in Society, 17, 4, 535–54.Google Scholar

Sorensen, A. P. (1972). Multilingualism in the northwest Amazon. In Pride, John B. & Holmes, Janet (eds.), Sociolinguistics, 78–93. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Soskin, William F. & John, Vera P. (1963). The study of spontaneous talk. In Barker, Roger (ed.), The stream of behaviour, 228–87. New York: Appleton-Ccntury-Crofts.Google Scholar

Spender, Dale (1980 a). Man made language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Spender, Dale (1980 b). Talking in class. In Spender, Dale & Sarah, Elizabeth (eds.), Learning to lose, 148–54. London: The Women's Press.Google Scholar

Spender, Dale (1982). Invisible women: the schooling scandal. London: Writers & Readers Publishing Cooperative Society.Google Scholar

Spender, Dale (1984). Defining reality: a powerful tool. In Cheris Kramarae, Muriel Schulz & William M. O'Barr (eds.), 194–205.Google Scholar

Staley, Constance (1978). Male–female use of expletives: a heck of a difference in expectations. Anthropological Linguistics, 20, 367–80.Google Scholar

Steckler, Nicola A. & Cooper, William E. (1980). Sex differences in color naming of unisex apparel. Anthropological Linguistics, 22, 373–81.Google Scholar

Stewart, Lea P. & Ting-Toomey, Stella (1986). Communication, gender and sex roles in diverse interaction context. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex. Strodtbeck, Fred L. (1975). Husband–wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 16, 468–73.Google Scholar

Strodtbeck, Fred L. (1975). Husband–wife interaction over revealed differences. American Sociological Review, 16, 468–73.Google Scholar

Strodtbeck, Fred L. and Mann, Richard D. (1956). Sex role differentiation in jury deliberations. Sociometry, 19, 3–11.Google Scholar

Swacker, Marjorie (1975). The sex of the speaker as a sociolinguistic variable. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 76–83.Google Scholar

Swacker, Marjorie (1979). Women's verbal behaviour at learned and professional conferences. In Betty-Lou Dubois & Isobel M. Crouch (eds.), 155–60.Google Scholar

Swann, Joan (1988). Talk control: an illustration from the classroom of problems in analysing male dominance in conversation. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 122–40.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (1990 a). You just don't understand: women and men in conversation. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar

Tannen, Deborah (1990 b). Gender differences in topical coherence. Discourse Processes, 13, 73–90.Google Scholar

Thomas, Beth (1988). Differences of sex and sects: linguistic variation and social networks in a Welsh mining village. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 51–61.Google Scholar

Thorne, Barrie & Henley, Nancy (eds.) (1975). Language and sex: difference and dominance. Rowley, Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Thorne, Barrie, Kramarae, Cheris & Henley, Nancy (eds.) (1983). Language, gender and society. Massachusetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Todd, Alexandra D. & Fisher, Sue (eds.) (1988). Gender and discourse: the power of talk. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich. Language in Society, 1, 2, 179–95.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (1974 a). Sociolinguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (1974 b). The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Trudgill, Peter (1983). On dialect. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Vetterling-Braggin, Mary (ed.) (1981). Sexist language. Totowa, N.J.: Littlefield, Adams.Google Scholar

Walters, J. (1981). Variation in requesting behaviour of bilingual children. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 77–92.Google Scholar

West, Candace (1990). Not just doctors' orders: directive Interaction, 7, 1, 87–106.Google Scholar

West, Candace (1990). Not just ‘doctors’ orders: directive response sequences in patients' visits to women and men physicians. Discourse and Society, 1, 1, 85–112.Google Scholar

West, Candace & Zimmerman, Don H. (1983). Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex conversations between unacquainted persons. In Barrie Thorne, Cheris Kramarae & Nancy Henley (ed.), 102–17.Google Scholar

West, Candace & Zimmerman, Don H. (1985). Gender, language, and discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (ed.) Handbook of discourse analysis. 4. Discourse analysis of society, 103–24.Google Scholar

Wodak, Ruth (1981). Women relate, men report: sex differences in language behaviour in a therapeutic group. Journal of Pragmatics, 5, 261–85.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa (1984). Pretty is as pretty does. Applied Linguistics, 5, 3, 236–44.Google Scholar

Wolfson, Nessa & Manes, Joan (1980). Don't ‘Dear’ me! In Sally McConnell-Ginet, Ruth Borker & Nelly Furman (eds.), 79–92.Google Scholar

Woods, Nicola (1988). Talking shop: sex and status as determinants of floor apportionment in a work setting. In Jennifer Coates & Deborah Cameron (eds.), 141–57.Google Scholar

Wright, John W. & Hosman, Lawrence A. (1983). Language style and sex bias in the courtroom: the effects of male and female use of hedges and intensifiers on impression information. The Southern Speech Communication Journal, 48, 137–52.Google Scholar

Zentella, Ann C. (1987). Language and female identity in the Puerto Rican community. In Joyce Penfield (ed.), 167–79.Google Scholar

Zimin, Susan (1981). Sex and politeness: factors in first- and second-language use. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27, 35–58.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, Don H. & West, Candace (1975). Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In Barrie Thorne & Nancy Henley (eds.), 105–29.Google Scholar