Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T06:36:11.509Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Research on language teaching and learning: 2000

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2008

Richard Johnstone
Richard Johnstone
Affiliation:
Scottish Centre for Information on Language Teaching and Research, University of Stirling
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review article
Information
Language Teaching , Volume 34 , Issue 3 , July 2001 , pp. 143 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aljaafreh, A. & Lantolf, J. P. (1994). Negative feedback as regulation and second language learning in the zone of proximal development. The Modern Language Journal, 78, 465–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. Q. (2000). Form-meaning connections and the French causative: an experiment in processing instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 1, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antonek, J., Donato, R. & Tucker, R. (2000). Differential linguistic development of Japanese language learners in elementary school. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 2, 325–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armand, F. (2000). Le role des capacités et de la competence langagière orale dans l'apprentissage de la lecture en francais langue maternelle et seconde. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 3, 469–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, P., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Daley, C. E. (2000). Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level. System, 28, 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, S. & Macintyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50, 2, 311–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. S. (2000). Literacy challenges for language learners in job-training programs. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 1, 173–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bellingham, L. (2000). Language acquisition after forty: a review of the literature. Babel, 35, 1, 24–32.Google Scholar
Blake, R. (2000). Computer mediated communication: a window on L2 Spanish interlanguage. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 1, 120–36.Google Scholar
Calvez, D. J. (2000). Advanced undergraduate French compositions: problems and solutions. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 1, 93–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, M., Murcia-Serra, J., Watorek, M. & Bendiscioli, A. (2000). The relevance of information organisation to second language acquisition studies. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 441–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clément, R. & Kruidener, B. G. (1983). Orientations in second language acquisition: 1. The effects of ethnicity, milieu and target language on their emergence. Language Learning, 33, 272–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collentine, J. (2000). Insights into the construction of grammatical knowledge provided by user-behaviour tracking technologies. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 2, 44–57.Google Scholar
Daniels, J. (2000). Intensive language work as a catalyst for classroom learning and an antidote for ‘vocabulary dormancy’. Language Learning Journal, 21, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, J. (2000). A study of language skills in the leisure and tourism industry. Language Learning Journal, 21, 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Courcy, M. & Burston, M. (2000). Learning mathematics through French in Australia. Language and Education, 14, 2, 75–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Guerrero, M. C. M. & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 1, 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias, J. (2000). Learner autonomy in Japan: transforming 'help yourself from threat to invitation. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 1, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donato, R., Tucker, R., Wudthayagorn, J. & Igarashi, K. (2000). Converging evidence: attitudes, achievements and instruction in the later years of FLES. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 4, 377–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dörnyei, Z. & Kormos, J. (2000). The roles of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4, 3, 275–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, R., Dunn, K. & Price, G. E. (1991). Productivity environmental preference survey. Price Systems Inc, Lawrence, KS.Google Scholar
Edelenbos, P. & Vinje, M. P. (2000). The assessment of foreign language at the end of primary (elementary) education. Language Testing, 17, 2, 144–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, R. (2000). Task-based research and language pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 4, 3, 193–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, L. & Evans, M. (2000). The school exchange visit: effects on attitudes and proficiency in language learning. Language Learning Journal, 22, 11–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, C. A. (2001). Gender differences: vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learners in CALL. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 2, 214–24.Google Scholar
Groot, P. J. M. (2000). Computer assisted second language vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 1, 60–81.Google Scholar
Han, Y. (2000). Grammaticality judgement tests: How reliable and valid are they? Applied Language Learning, 11, 1, 177–204.Google Scholar
Harley, B. & Hart, D. (2000). Vocabulary learning in the content-oriented second-language classroom: student perceptions and proficiency. Language Awareness, 9, 2, 78–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegelheimer, V. & Chapelle, C. A. (2000). Methodological issues in research on learner-computer interactions in CALL. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 1, 41–59.Google Scholar
Hinenoya, K. & Gatbonton, E. (2000). Ethnocentrism, cultural traits and beliefs, and English proficiency: a Japanese sample. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 2, 225–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulstijn, J. A. (2000). The use of computer technology in experimental studies of second language acquisition: a survey of some techniques and some ongoing studies. Language Learning and Technology, 3, 2, 34–43.Google Scholar
Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4, 1, 33–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ife, A. (2000). Language learning and residence abroad: how self-directed are students? Language Learningjournal, 22, 30–37.Google Scholar
Izumi, S. & Bigelow, M. (2000). Does output promote noticing and SLA? TESOL Quarterly, 34, 2, 239–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., Prior, S. & Artuso, M. (2000). Field dependence as a factor in second language communicative production. Language Learning, 50, 3, 529–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, B. & Goettsch, K. (2000). In search of the knowledge base of language teaching: explanations by experienced teachers. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 3, 437–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, R. (2000). Context-sensitive assessment of modern languages in primary (elementary) and early secondary education: Scotland and the European experience. Language Testing, 17, 2, 124–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, M-L. (2000). Workplace language teaching and the intercultural construction of ideologies of competence. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 1, 144–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khaldieh, S. A. (2000). Learning strategies and writing processes of proficient vs less-proficient learners of Arabic. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 5, 522–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. (2000). The role of attention in monitoring second language speech production. Language Learning, 50, 2, 343–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labrie, N., Belanger, N., Lozon, R. & Roy, S. (2000). Mondialisation et exploitation des ressources linguistiques: Ies défis des communautes francophones de I'Ontario. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 1, 88–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lai, P-C. & Wong, I. (2000). The clash of cultures in the job interview. Journal of Language for International Business, 11, 1, 31–40.Google Scholar
Lam, Y. (2000). Technophobia or technophilia? A preliminary look at why second language teachers do or do not use technology in their classrooms. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 3, 389–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laplante, B. (2000). Apprendre en sciences, c'est apprendre a ‘parler sciences’: des élèves de l'immersion nous parlent desreactions chimiques. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 2, 245–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeke, P. & Shaw, P. (2000). Learners' independent records of vocabulary. System, 28, 271–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) Speaking: from intention to articulation. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Li, D. (2000). The pragmatics of making requests in the L2. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 1, 58–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Y. (2000). Linguistic characteristics of ESL writing in taskbased e-mail activities. System, 28, 229–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (1985). Great expectations: second language acquisition research and classroom teaching. Applied Linguistics, 6, 173–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightbown, P. M. (2000). Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 21, 4, 431–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liou, H-C. (2000). Assessing learners' strategies using computers: new insights and limitations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 1, 65–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lore, A. & Beaton, F. (2000). Adult foreign language learners: motivation, attitudes and behaviours. Language Learning Journal, 21, 31–36.Google Scholar
Low, L., Brown, S., Johnstone, R. & Pirrie, A. (1995). Evaluating foreign languages at primary school. Final report to the Scottish Office Education and Industry Department. University of Stirling: Scottish CILT.Google Scholar
Lynch, T. & Maclean, J. (2000). Exploiting the benefits of task repetition and recycling for classroom language learning. Language Teaching Research, 4, 3, 221–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macrory, G. & Stone, V. (2000). Pupil progress in the acquisition of the perfect tense in French: the relationship between knowledge and use. Language Teaching Research, 4, 1, 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinova-Todd, S. H., Marshall, D. B. & Snow, C. E. (2000). Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 1, 9–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattos, A. M. DE A. (2000). A Vygotskyan approach to evaluation in foreign language learning contexts. ELT Journal, 54, 4, 335–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgements in a second language: influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 395–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonough, K. & Mackey, A. (2000). Communicative tasks, conversational interaction and linguistic form: an empirical study of Thai. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 1, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, P. (2000). On ESL standards for school-age learners. Language Testing, 17, 2, 185–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, R. (2000). Applied linguistics and evidence-based classroom practice: the case of foreign language grammar pedagogy. Applied Linguistics, 21, 3, 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller-Hartmann, A. (2000). The role of tasks in promoting intercultural learning in electronic networks. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 2, 129–47.Google Scholar
Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 4, 617–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nassaji, H. & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: the effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 1, 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolov, M. (2000). The critical period hypothesis reconsidered: successful adult learners of Hungarian and English. IRAL, 38, 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R. & Vallerand, R.J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50, 1, 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, J. M. & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: a research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 3, 417–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Dowd, R. (2000). Intercultural learning via videoconferencing: a pilot exchange project. Re CALL, 12, 1, 49–61.Google Scholar
OÓLaoire, M., Burke, M. & Haslam, M. (2000). From L2 to L3/L4: an investigation of learners' metalinguistic awareness and learner strategies. Teangeolas, 38/9, 52–58.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 1, 119–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Neill, N. S. (2000). Multicultural, multiracial high school students' feelings toward Hispanic cultures. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 1, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, R. (2000). Exploring gender and oral proficiency interview performance. System, 28, 373–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: what every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House/Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Paivio, A. (1991) Dual coding theory: retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parks, S. (2000). Professional writing and the role of incidental collaboration: evidence from a medical setting. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 2, 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfeld, W. & Roberts, L. (1959). Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rifkin, B. (2000). Video in the proficiency-based advanced conversation class: an example from the Russian-language curriculum. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 1, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robin, J-D. (2000). L'enseignement bilingue breton-francais: un enseignement bilingue équilibré. Le Français dans le Monde, Janvier 2000, 56–63.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M. & Sadoski, M. (2000). Effects of rote, context, keyword and context-keyword methods on retention of vocabulary in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 2, 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, K. (2000). An exploratory cross-sectional study of interlanguage pragmatic development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 1, 27–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, S. (2000). La normalisation linguistique dans une entreprise: le mot d'ordre mondial. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 1, 118–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (2000). L2 morphosyntactic development in text-based computer-mediated communication. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13, 1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 2, 129–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sellers, V. D. (2000). Anxiety and reading comprehension in Spanish as a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 5, 512–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotillo, S. M. (2000). Discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication. Language Learning and Technology, 4, 1, 82–119.Google Scholar
Spolsky, B. (2000). Language motivation revisited. Applied Linguistics, 21, 2, 157–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. & Lapkin, S. (2000). Task-based second language learning: the uses of the first language. Language Teaching Research, 4, 3, 251–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarone, E. & Kuehn, K. (2000). Negotiating the social services oral intake interview: communicative needs of nonnative speakers of English. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 1, 99–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A. (2000). Boy-free zone? Language Learning Journal, 21, 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, H. (2000). Using the computer to compare foreign and native language writing processes: a statistical and case study approach. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 2, 155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tse, L. (2000). Student perceptions of foreign language study: a qualitative analysis of foreign language autobiographies. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 1, 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. B. M. & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 2, 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandergrift, L. (2000). Setting up students for success: formative evaluation and FLES. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 3, 290–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanpatten, B. & Cadierno, T. (1993). Explicit instruction and input processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 225–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vivet, A. (2000). L'inquiétant etrangete de la langue seconde. Le Francais dans le Monde, Janvier 2000, 98–109.Google Scholar
Wakamoto, N. (2000). Language learning strategy and personality variables: focusing on extraversion and introversion. IRAL, 38, 71–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, C. J. & Tedick, D. J. (2000). The complexity of immersion education: teachers address the issues. The Modern Language Journal, 84, 1, 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, J. L. (1973). Opinions of university students about language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 7, 102–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warden, C. A. S. & Lin, H. J. (2000). Existence of integrative motivation in an Asian EFL setting. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 5, 535–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Way, D. P., Joiner, E. G. & Seaman, M. A. (2000). Writing in secondary foreign language classrooms: the effects of prompts and tasks on novice learners of French. The Modem Language Journal, 82, 2, 171–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wesche, M. B. & Paribakht, T. S. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: an introspective study. The Modem Language Journal, 84, 2, 196–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, H. & Thorne, D. (2000). The value of teletext subtitling as a medium for language learning. System, 28, 2, 217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zephir, F. (2000). Focus on form and meaning: perspectives of developing teachers and action-based research. Foreign Language Annals, 33, 1, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar