Andersen, H. (1972). Diphthongization. Language, 48, 11–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, H. (1978). Vocalic and consonantal languages. In Duroviě, L. et al. . (eds.), Studia linguistica A. V. Issatchenko…⊙blata, 1–12. Lisse: de Riddes.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds.) (1974 a). Proceedings of the first international conferencae on historical linguistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (1974b). Three theses concerning phonological representations. Journal of Linguistics, 10, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, S. R. (1974). The organization of phonology. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, S. R. (1976). Nasal consonants and the internal structure of segments. Language, 52, 326–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, S. R. (1980). Notes on the development of phonological theory. Language and Speech, 23, 115–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Anderson, S. R. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.) (1973). A festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar

Andrews, J. (1975). An introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar

Anttila, R. (1978). Review of S. Ohlander: Phonology meaning morphology Journal of Linguistics, 14, 93–7.Google Scholar

Árnason, Kr. (1980). Quantity in historical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1976). Phonology since generative phonology. Papiere zur Linguistik, 11, 5–19.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1977). Converging criteria for establishing consonantal marking values in different positions in the syllable. In Drachman, G. (ed), Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik, 3, 21–53.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1978). System of English intonation with gradient models. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Bailey, C.-J. N. (1981). Theory, description and differences among linguists or what keeps linguistics from becoming (a science). Language and Communication, 1, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Basbøll, H. (1977). The structure of the syllable and a proposed hierarchy of distinctive features. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 143–8.Google Scholar

Basbøll, H. (1978). On the use of ‘domains’ in phonology. In Dressler, W. and Meid, W. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists, 763–6. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Basbøll, H. (1980). Report [on phonology, from the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Copenhagen, 1979]. = Phonology. Language and Speech, 23, 91–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (1978 a). Issues and evidence in syllabic phonology. In Bell & Hooper (1978b), 3–22.Google Scholar

Bell, A. & Hooper, J. B. (eds.) (1978 b). Syllables and segments. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Bhat, D. N. S. (1978). A general study of palatalization. In Greenberg (1978 b), 47–92.Google Scholar

Bjarkman, P. C. (1974). Rule order and Stampe's natural phonology. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Bjarkman, P. C. (1975). Toward a proper conception of processes in natural phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, 11, 60–72.Google Scholar

Bolozky, S. (1977). Fast speech as a function of tempo in natural generative phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 217–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Broecke, M. v.d. (1976). Hierarchies and rank-orderings in distinctive features. Assen etc.: van Gorcum.Google Scholar

Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamentals of phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Chen, M. Y. (1974). Natural phonology from the diachronic vantage point. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology, pp. 43–80. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. & Haile, M. (1968). The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper, Row.Google Scholar

Clements, G. N. (1977). The autosegmental treatment of vowel harmony. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 111–19.Google Scholar

Coates, R. A. (1980). Time in phonological representations. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coates, R. A. (1982). Why Hungarian isn't as extrinsic as Vago thinks. Journal of Linguistics, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cutler, A. & Fay, D. (forthcoming). One mental lexicon, phonologically arranged: comments on Hurford's comments. In Linguistic Inquiry, 13 (1982).Google Scholar

de, Chene B. & Anderson, S. R. (1979). Compensatory lengthening. Language, 55, 505–35.Google Scholar

Dell, F. (1973). Les règles et lessons: introduction à la phonologie générative. Paris: Hermann (Collection Savoir).Google Scholar

Dell, F. (1980). Generative phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. (1977). Some formal and empirical issues in atomic phonology. Now in Goyvaerts (1979).Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. (1979 a). Atomic phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 31–49.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. (ed.) (1979 b). Current approaches to phonological theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. (1980). Phonological rules and phonetic explanation. Journal of Linguistics, 16, 171–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dinnsen, D. A. & Eckman, F. (1978). Some substantive universals in atomic phonology. Lingua, 45, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Donegan, P. J. & Stampe, D. (1979). The study of natural phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 126–73.Google Scholar

Drachman, G. (1977). On the notion ‘phonological hierarchy’. In Dressier & Pfeiffer (1977), 85–102.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. (1972). Allegroregeln rechtfertigen Lentoregeln. Sekundäre Phoneme des Bretonischen. Innsbruck: lnstitut für Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. (1976). Methodisches zu Aliegro-Regeln. In Dressler & Mareš (1976), 219–34.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. (1979). External evidence for an abstract analysis of the German velar nasal. Wiener Linguistische Gazette, 19, 3–27. Also in Goyvaerts (1979).Google Scholar

Dressler, W. & Mareš, F. (eds.) (1976). Phonologica 1972. Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Dressler, W. & Pfeiffer, U. F. (eds.) (1977). Phonologica 1976 Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar

Dudas, K. (1974). A case of functional phonological opacity: Javanese elative formation. Studies in the linguistic sciences, 4, 91–111.Google Scholar

Durand, J. & Lyche, C. (1978). The s–ø alternation in French: a morphological solution. Journal of Linguistics, 14, 259–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fay, D. & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the mental lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 505–20.Google Scholar

Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1972). Formant frequencies of long and short Danish vowels. In Firchow, E. S. (ed.), Studies for Einar Haugen. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1975). Trends in phonological theory. Copenhagen: Akademisk Foriag.Google Scholar

Fisiak, J. (ed.) (1978). Historical morphology. Proceedings of the Boszkowo conference. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Foley, J. (1977). Foundations of theoretical phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fromkin, V. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fujimura, O. (ed.) (1974). Three dimensions of linguistic theory. Tokyo: TEC.Google Scholar

Gamkrelidze, T. (1975). On the correlation of stops and fricatives in a phonological system. Lingua, 35, Similarly in Greenberg (1978 b), 9–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gamkrelidze, T. (1979). Hierarchical relations among phonemic units as phonological universals. Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), II, 9–15.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. (1976 a). An overview of autosegmental phonology. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 23–68.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. (1976 b). Autosegmental phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Now published as a Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1979).Google Scholar

Goldsmith, J. (1979). The aims of autosegmental phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 202–22.Google Scholar

Goyvaerts, D. L. (ed.) (1979). Phonology in the 1970s. Ghent: Story-Scientia.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. (1978 a). Some generalisations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In Greenberg (1978 b), 243–80.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. (ed.) (1978 b). Universals of human language. II: phonology. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Griffen, T. D. (1976). Towards a nonsegmental phonology. Lingua, 40, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gussmann, E. (1978). Explorations in abstract phonology. Lublin: Marie-Curie-Sklodowska University.Google Scholar

Gussmann, E. (1979). Abstract phonology arid psychological reality. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), 1, 101–7.Google Scholar

Halle, M. (1973). Prologomena to a theory of word-formation. Linguistic Inquiry, 4 3–16.Google Scholar

Hastings, A. (1974). Stfling. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Hellberg, S. (1978). Unnatural phonology. Journal of Linguistics, 14, 157–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hinton, L. (1980). When sounds go wild. Language, 56, 320–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooper, J. B. (1972). The syllable in phonological theory. Language, 48, 525–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooper, J. B. (1974). Rule morphologisation in natural generative phonology. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 160–70.Google Scholar

Hooper, J. B. (1975). The archi-segment in natural generative phonology. Language, 51, 536–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hooper, J. B. (1976). An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hooper, J. B. (1978). The link between markedness and rule naturalness. In Dressier, W. and Meid, W.. (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth International Congress of Linguists (Innsbruck: Innsbrucker Beiträge zur Sprachwissenschaft), 777–80.Google Scholar

Hooper, J. B. & Terrell, T. (1976). Stress assignment in Spanish: a natural generative analysis. Glossa, 10, 64–110.Google Scholar

Houlihan, K. & Iverson, G. K. (1979). Functionally-constrained phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 50–73.Google Scholar

Householder, F. W. (1979). How different are they? In Dinnsen (1979 b), 252–64.Google Scholar

Howard, I. (1972). A directional theory of rule-application in phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Also Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Howard, I. (1975). Can the ‘elsewhere condition’ get anywhere? Language, 51, 109–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hudson, G. (1974). The representation of non-productive alternations. In Anderson and Jones (1974 a), 203–29.Google Scholar

Hudson, G. (1975). Suppletion in the representation of alternations. UCLA doctoral dissertation.Google Scholar

Hudson, G. (1980). Automatic alternations in non-transformational phonology. Language, 56, 94–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hurford, J. R. (1977). The significance of linguistic generalisations. Language, 53, 574–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, R. & Waugh, L. (1979). The sound shape of language. Hassocks: Harvester.Google Scholar

Johnson, C. D. (1971). Unbounded expressions in rules of stress and accent. Glossa, 4, 185–96.Google Scholar

Katamba, F. X. (1979). How hierarchical and universal is consonant strength? Theoretical linguistics, 6, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaye, J. D. (1979). The mystery of the tenth vowel. MS. To appear In Kaye, J. D. & Kisseberth, C. W. (eds.), Non-superficial phonology.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. W. (1977). Topics in phonological theory. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Kenstowicz, M. & Kisseberth, C. W. (1979). Generative phonology. Description and theory. New York etc.: Academic Press.Google Scholar

King, R. D. (1975). In defense of extrinsic ordering. In Koutsoudas (1976), 76–95.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1973). ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In Anderson, & Kiparsky, (1973), 93–106.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1974). How abstract in phonology? In Fujimura (1974), 5–56.Google Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1975). Stress, syntax and meter. Language, 51, 576–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kiparsky, P. (1977). The rhythmic structure of English verse. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 189–248.Google Scholar

Klausenburger, J. (1978). French linking phenomena: a natural generative analysis. Language, 54, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koutsoudas, A. (ed.) (1976). The application and ordering of grammatical rules. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Koutsoudas, A. (1977). On the necessity of the morphophonemic-allophonic distinction. In Dressier and Pfeiffer (1977), 121–6.Google Scholar

Koutsoudas, A. (1980). The question of rule-ordering: some common fallacies. Journal of Linguistics, 16, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Koutsoudas, A., Sanders, G. & Noll, C. (1974). On the application of phonological rules. Language, 50, 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Krohn, R. (1972). On the sequencing of tautosegmental features. Papers in Linguistics, 5, 114ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to linguistic phonetics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Lass, R. (1976). English phonology and phonological theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lass, R. & Anderson, J. M. (1975). Old, English phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Leben, W. (1973). Suprasegmental phonology. MIT doctoral dissertation. Now published as a Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1980).Google Scholar

Leben, W. (1976). The tones in English intonation. Linguistic Analysis, 2, 69–107.Google Scholar

Leben, W. (1979). The phonological component as a parsing device. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 174–201.Google Scholar

Leben, W. & Robinson, O. (1977). ‘Upside-down’ phonology. Language, 53, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Liberman, M. (1975). The intonational system of English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar

Liberman, M. & Prince, A. (1977). On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry, 8, 249–336.Google Scholar

Lightner, T. M. (1975). The role of derivational morphology in a generative grammar. Language, 51, 617–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lindau, M. E. (1975). Features for vowels. UCLA doctoral dissertation. Also Ann Arbor: Xerox University Microfilms.Google Scholar

Linell, P. (1979). Psychological reality in phonology: a theoretical study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lipski, J. M. (1974). Toward a production model of Spanish morphology: a further look at plurals. Studio linguistica, 28, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Marsien-Wilson, W. (1981). Speech understanding as a psychological process. In Simon, J. C. (ed.), Spoken language generation and understanding (Dordrecht: Reidel).Google Scholar

Mensah, E. (1979). The nature of lingual consonants. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Copenhagen), I, 306.Google Scholar

Pagliuca, W. & Mowrey, R. (1890). On' certain evidence for the feature [grave]. Language, 56, 503–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pellowe, J. & Jones, V. (1978). On intonational variability in Tyneside speech. In Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic patterns in British English (London: Arnold), 101–21.Google Scholar

Plank, F. (1981). On the reapplication of morphological rules after phonological rules. Paper read to the Autumn Meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain (York).Google Scholar

Pulgram, E. (1970). Syllable, word, nexus, cursus. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. (1973). Some implications of natural phonology. Chicago Linguistic Society, 9, 530–41.Google Scholar

Rhodes, R. A. (1974). Non-parametric environments in natural phonology. In Papersfrom the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 285–96.Google Scholar

Ringen, C. O. (1972). On arguments for rule-ordering. Foundations of Language, 8, 266–73.Google Scholar

Rosetti, A. (1963). Sur la théorie de la syllabe. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar

Rudes, B. (1976). Lexical representations and variable rules in natural generative phonology. Glossa, 10, 111–50.Google Scholar

Sanders, G. (1974). The simplex feature hypothesis. Glossa, 8, 141–92.Google Scholar

Schane, S. A. (1968). On the non-uniqueness of phonological representations. Language, 44, 709–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schane, S. A. (1972). Natural rules in phonology. In Stockwell & Macaulay (1972), 199–229.Google Scholar

Schane, S. A. (1974). How abstract is abstract? In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 297–317.Google Scholar

Schane, S. A. (1979). Nonsegmental phonology. In Dinnsen (1979 b), 303–9.Google Scholar

Selkirk, E. O. (1980). The role of prosodic categories in English word stress. Linguistic Inquiry, 11, 563–605.Google Scholar

Shuy, R. & Bailey, C.-J. N. (eds.) (1973). Towards tomorrow's linguistics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Sommerstein, A. H. (1975). The margins of morphophonemics. Journal of Linguistics, 11, 249–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sommerstein, A. H. (1977). Modern phonology. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Stahlke, H. (1975). Some problems with binary features for tone. In Herbert, R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on African Linguistics, 210–26.Google Scholar

Stampe, D. (1973). A dissertation on natural phonology. Chicago doctoral dissertation. Now published ass Garland Outstanding Dissertation (1979). Occasionally referred to in the literature as How Ispent my summer vacation.Google Scholar

Stockwell, R. & Macaulay, R. K. S. (eds.) (1972). Linguistic change and generative theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar

Tench, P. (1976). Double ranks in a phonological hierarchy. Journal of Linguistics, 12, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vago, R. M. (1977). In support of extrinsic ordering. Journal of Linguistics, 13, 25–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vanderslice, R. & Ladefoged, P. (1972). Binary suprasegmental features and transformational word- accentuation rules. Language, 48, 819–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1972 a). On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguistische Berichte, 18, 1–18.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1972 b). Rule inversion. Lingua, 29, 209–42.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1972 c). Phonological uniqueness in natural generative grammar. Glossa, 6, 105–16.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1973). Phonological concreteness in natural generative grammar. In Shuy & Bailey (1973), 202–19.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1974 a). Words and syllables in natural generative grammar. In Papers from the parasession on natural phonology (Chicago: CLS), 346–74.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1974 b). Sanskrit suki and the concept of a natural class. Linguistics, 130, 91–7.Google Scholar

Vennemann, T. (1978). Universal syllabic phonology. Theoretical Linguistics, 5, 175–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vincent, N. (1978). Words vs. morphemes in morphological change: the case of Italian -iamo. In Fisiak (1978).Google Scholar

Vogel, I. (1977). Length phenomena in Italian: support for the syllable. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 3, 600-9.Google Scholar

Waterson, N. (1976). Perception and production in the acquisition of phonology. In Raffler-Engel, W. von & Lebrun, Y. (eds.), Baby talk and infant speech. (Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger), 294–3022.Google Scholar

Williamson, K. (1977). Multivalued features for consonants. Language, 53, 843–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zwicky, A. M. (1972). Note on a phonological hierarchy in English. In Stockwell & Macaulay (1972), 275–301.Google Scholar