Allen, C. L. (1977). A study of the effect of selected mechanical errors on teachers' evaluation of the non-mechanical aspects of students' writing. DAI 37: 5554–A. ED 147 812.Google Scholar

Allen, J. P. B. & Corder, S. P. (eds.) (1974). The Edinburgh Course in Applied Linguistics, Vol. 3. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Allwright, R. L., Woodley, M-P., & Allwright, J. M. (1988). Investigating reformulation as a practical strategy for the teaching of academic writing. Applied Linguistics 9, 236–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Angelis, P. J. (1975). Sentence combining, error analysis and the teaching of writing. In M. K. Burt & H. Dulay (eds.).Google Scholar

Azevedo, M. M. (1980). The interlanguage of advanced learners: an error analysis of graduate students' Spanish. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 217–27.Google Scholar

Bamberg, B. (1984). Assessing coherence: a reanalysis of essays written for the National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1969–1979. Research in the Teaching of English, 18, 305–19.Google Scholar

Bardovi-Harlig, K. & Bofman, T. (1989). Attainment of syntactic and morphological accuracy by advanced language learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11 1, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Becker, A. (1965). A tagmemic approach to paragraph analysis. College Composition and Communication, 16, 237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bell, R. T. (1974). Error analysis: a recent pseudoprocedure in applied linguistics. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 25/6, 35–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Benson, J. D. & Greaves, W. S. (eds.) (1985). Systemic perspectives on discourse 2: selected papers from the 9th International Systemic Workshop. Advances in Discourse Processes, 16. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar

Bhatia, A. T. (1974). An error analysis of students' composition. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 337–50.Google Scholar

Bloor, T. & Norrish, J. (eds.) (1987). Written language. British Studies in Applied Linguistics, 2. London: CILT Publications.Google Scholar

Blount, N. S., Johnson, S. L. & Fredrick, W. C. (1968). A comparison in the writing of eighth- and twelfth-grade students, Technical Report No. 78. Madison, Wisconsin: Wisconsin: Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar

Britton, B. K. & Black, J. B. (eds.) (1985). Understanding expository text. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Britton, J. N., Burgess, T., Martin, N., McLeod, A. & Rosen, H. (1975). The development of writing abilities (11–18). London: Macmillan Education Ltd.Google Scholar

Brodkey, D. & Young, R. (1981). Composition correctness scores. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 159–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, G. (1989). Making sense: the interaction of linguistic expression and contextual information. Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brown, H. (ed.) (1976). Papers in Second Language Acquisition, Language Learning Special Issue No. 4.Google Scholar

Bruce, B., Rubin, A. & Starr, K. (1981). Why readability formulas fail. Reading Education Report No. 28. Urbana, ILL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading, ED 205 915.Google Scholar

Burt, M. K. (1975). Error analysis in the adult EFL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 9, 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Burt, M. K. & Dulay, H. (eds.) New directions in second language learning, teaching, and bilingual education. On TESOL '75. Washington, D.C.: TESOL.Google Scholar

Buteau, M. F. (1970). Students' errors and the learning of French as a second language: a pilot study. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 8, 133–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Charolles, M. (1978). Introduction aux problèmes de la cohérence des textes. Langue Française, 38, 7–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christensen, F. (1965). A generative rhetoric of the paragraph. College Composition and Communication, 16, 144–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combettes, B. (1977). Ordre des éléments de la phrase et linguistique du texte. Pratiques, 13, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combettes, B. (1978). Thématisation et progression thématique dans les récits d'enfants. Langue Française, 38, 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Combs, W. E. (1976). Further effects of sentence-combining practice on writing ability. Research in the Teaching of English, 10, 137–49.Google Scholar

Combs, W. E. (1977). Sentence-combining practice: Do gains in judgment of writing ‘quality’ persist? Journal of Educational Research, 70, 318–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, U. (1987 a). Research frontiers in writing analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 4, 677–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Connor, U. (1987 b). Argumentative patterns in student essays: cross-cultural differences. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 57–72.Google Scholar

Connor, U. & Kaplan, R. B. (eds.) (1987). Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.Google Scholar

Connor, U. & Lauer, J. (1985). Understanding persuasive essay writing: linguistic/rhetorical approach. Text, 5, 4, 309–26.Google Scholar

Coombs, V. (1986). Syntax and communicative strategies in intermediate German composition. Modern Language Journal, 70, 2, 114–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, C. R. (1977). Holistic evaluation of writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.).Google Scholar

Cooper, C. R. (1983). Procedures for describing written texts. In P. Mosenthal, L. Tamor & S. Walmsley (eds.), 287–313.Google Scholar

Cooper, C. R. & Odell, L. (1977). Evaluating writing: describing, measuring, judging. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Cooper, C. R. & Greenbaum, S. (1986). Studying writing: linguistic approaches. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Cooper, T. C. (1976). Measuring written syntactic patterns of second-language learners of German. Journal of Educational Research, 69, 5, 176–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, T. C. (1977). A strategy for teaching writing. Modern Language Journal, 61, 251–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, T. C. (1981). Sentence combining: an experiment in teaching writing. Modern Language Journal, 65, 158–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cooper, T. C. & Morain, G. (1980). A study of sentence-combining techniques for developing written and oral fluency in French. French Review, 53, 411–23.Google Scholar

Cooper, T. C., Morain, G. & Kalivoda, T. (1980). Sentence combining in second language instruction. Language in Education Series, No. 31. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics/ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics ED 195 167.Google Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners' errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 161–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1971). Idiosyncratic dialects and error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 9, 147–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corder, S. P. (1974). Error analysis. In J. P. B. Allen & S. P. Corder (eds.), 122–54.Google Scholar

Couture, B. (1985). A systematic analysis of writing quality. In J. D. Benson & W. S. Greaves (eds.), 67–87.Google Scholar

Couture, B. (ed.) (1986). Functional approaches to writing: research perspectives. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. (1980). Syntactic complexity and teachers' quality ratings of narrations and arguments. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 223–31.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. (1987). Cohesion in argument and narration at 3 grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 185–201.Google Scholar

Crowhurst, M. & Piché, G. L. (1979). Audience and mode of discourse effects on syntactic complexity in writing at two grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 101–9.Google Scholar

Crowley, S. (1989). Linguistics and composition instruction: 1950–1980. Written Communication, 6, 4, 480–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cumming, A. (1989). Writing expertise and second-language proficiency. Language Learning, 39, 1, 81–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daiker, D., Kerek, A. & Morenberg, M. (1978). Sentence combining and syntactic maturity in freshman English. College Composition and Communication, 29, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Daiker, D., Kerek, A. & Morenberg, M. (eds.) (1979). Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. Conway, Arkansas: University of Akron and University of Central Arkansas.Google Scholar

Dale, E. & Chall, J. (1948). A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin, 27, 37–54.Google Scholar

D'Angelo, F. (1974). A generative rhetoric of the essay. College Composition and Communication, 25, 388–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Davison, A., Kantor, R. N., Hannah, J., Hermon, G., Lutz, R. & Salzillo, R. (1980). Limitations of readability formulas in guiding adaptations of texts. Technical Report No. 162. Urbana, ILL: University of Illinois Center for the Study of Reading, ED 184 090.Google Scholar

Dehghanpisheh, E. (1978). Language development in Farsi and English: implications for the second-language learner. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 16, 1, 45–61.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Discourse analysis: its development and application to the structure of news. Journal of Communication, 33, 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, E. (1970). Indexes of syntactic maturity (Dixon-Hunt-Christensen). ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills ED 091 748.Google Scholar

Dommergues, J.-Y. & Lane, H. (1978). On two independent sources of error in learning the syntax of a second language. Language Learning, 26, 111–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Doushaq, M. H. (1986). An investigation into stylistic errors of Arab students learning English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 5, 1, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Durst, R. K. (1987). Cognitive and linguistic demands of analytic writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 4, 347–76.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1985 a). Coherence, composition, and text linguistics. In N. E. Enkvist (ed.), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1985 b). Stylistics, text linguistics, and composition. Text, 5, 251–67.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (ed.) (1985). Coherence and composition: a symposium. Åbo, Finland: Publications of the Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar

Enkvist, N. E. (1987). Text linguistics for the applier: an orientation. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 23–43.Google Scholar

Evensen, L. S. (1985). Discourse-level interlanguage studies. In N. E. Enkvist (ed.).Google Scholar

Fagan, W. T. & Hayden, H. M. (1988). Writing processes in French and English of fifth grade French immersion students. Canadian Modern Language Review, 44, 4, 653–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Faigley, L. (1979). Another look at sentences. Freshman English News, 7, 3, 18–21.Google Scholar

Faigley, L. (1980). Names in search of a concept: maturity, fluency, complexity and growth in written syntax. College Composition and Communication, 31, 3, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fitzgerald, J. & Spiegel, D. L. (1986). Textual cohesion and coherence in children's writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 20, 3, 263–80.Google Scholar

Flahive, D. & Snow, B. G. (1980). Measures of syntactic complexity in evaluating ESL compositions. In J. W. Oiler & K. Perkins (eds.).Google Scholar

Flesch, R. (1949). The art of readable writing. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (1980). Writing in the college years: some indices of growth. College Composition and Communication, 31, 3, 311–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (1984). Why students can't write arguments. English in Education, 18, 2, 72–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Freedman, A. & Pringle, I. (eds.) (1980). Reinventing the rhetorical tradition. Urbana, ILL: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar

Freedman, A., Pringle, I. & Yalden, J. (eds.) (1983). Learning to write: first language/second language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar

Givón, T. (1983). Topic continuity in discourse: an introduction. In T. Givón (ed.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Givón, T. (ed.) (1983). Topic continuity in discourse. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Golden, J., Haslett, B. & Gauntt, H. (1988). Structure and content in 8th graders' summary essays. Discourse Processes, 11, 139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Götz, J. & Hülmann, H. (1988). Von der Textaufgabe zum Zieltext (II). Die Neueren Sprachen, 87, 5, 506–38.Google Scholar

Grabe, W. (1984). Written discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 5, 101–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grady, M. (1971). A conceptual rhetoric of the composition. College Composition and Communication, 22, 348–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grauberg, W. (1971). Error analysis in German of first year university students. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.).Google Scholar

Green, P. S. & Hecht, K. (1985). Native and non-native evaluation of learners' errors in written discourse. System, 13, 2, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Grobe, C. (1981). Syntactic maturity, mechanics, and vocabulary as predictors of quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 15, 75–85.Google Scholar

Haden, R. (1987). Discourse error analysis. In J. Monaghan (ed.), 134–46.Google Scholar

Hake, R. L. & Williams, J. M. (1979). Sentence expanding: not can, or how, but when. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar

Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Halloway, D. W. (1981). Semantic grammars: how they help us teach writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.Google Scholar

Hammarberg, B. (1974). The insufficiency of error analysis. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 12, 185–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hartnett, C. G. (1986). Static and dynamic cohesion: signals of thinking in writing. In B. Couture (ed.), 142–53.Google Scholar

Haswell, R. H. (1988). Length of text and the measurement of cohesion. Research in the Teaching of English, 22, 4, 428–33.Google Scholar

Hatim, B. (1987). A text linguistic model for the analysis of discourse errors: contributions from Arabic linguistics. In J. Monaghan (ed.), 102–13.Google Scholar

Hennig, K. R. Jr., (1980). Composition writing and the functions of language. DAI 41: 2424–A.Google Scholar

Hillocks, G. Jr., (1986). Research on written composition. New directions for teaching. ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills, Urbana, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hult, C. A. (1986). Global marking of rhetorical frame in text and reader evaluation. In B. Couture (ed.), 154–68.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. NCTE Research Report No. 3. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1970 a). Syntactic maturity in schoolchildren and adults. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 35, 1. Chicago, ILL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1970 b). Do sentences in the second language grow like those in the first? TESOL Quarterly, 4, 3, 195–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hunt, K. W. (1971). Teaching syntactic maturity. In G. E. Perren & J. L. M. Trim (eds.).Google Scholar

Inghilleri, M. (1989). Learning to mean as a symbolic and social process: the story of ESL writers. Discourse Processes, 12, 3, 391–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobovits, L. A. (1969). Second language learning and transfer theory: a theoretical assessment. Language Learning, 19, 55–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jacobs, S. E. (1981). Rhetorical information as prediction. TESOL Quarterly, 15, 237–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statements: linguistics and poetics. In T. A. Sebeok (ed.).Google Scholar

Kameen, P. T. (1978). A mechanical, meaningful, and communicative framework for ESL sentence combining exercises. TESOL Quarterly, 12, 395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kameen, P. T. (1983). Syntactic skill and ESL writing quality. In A. Frcedman, I. Pringle & J. Yalden (eds.), 170.Google Scholar

Kieras, D. E. (1978). Good and bad structure in simple paragraphs: effects on apparent theme, reading time, and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 13–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kieras, D. E. & Just, M. (eds.) (1984). New methods in reading comprehension. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

King, M. L. & Rentel, V. M. (1979). Towards a theory of early writing development. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 243–53.Google Scholar

La Brant, L. L. (1933). A study of certain language developments of children in grades 4–12 inclusive. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 14, 4, 387–491.Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P. (1988). The syntactic complexity of written texts in Spanish as a foreign language: a markedness perspective. Hispania, 71, 4, 933–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D. & Strom, V. S. (1977). The construction of a second-language acquisition index of development. Language Learning, 27, 123–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lautamatti, L. (1978). Some observations on cohesion and coherence in simplified texts. In J. O. O˚stman (ed.), 165–81.Google Scholar

Lautamatti, L. (1987). Observations on the development of the topic of simplified discourse. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 87–114.Google Scholar

Levenston, E. A. (1978). Error analysis of free composition: the theory and the practice. Indian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4, 1, 1–11.Google Scholar

Lindeberg, A. C. (1985). Abstraction levels in student essays. Text, 5, 4, 327–46.Google Scholar

Lintermann-Rygh, L. (1985). Connector density – an indicator of essay quality? Text, 5, 4, 347–58.Google Scholar

McCann, T. M. (1989). Student argumentative writing knowledge and ability at three grade levels. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 1, 62–76.Google Scholar

McLure, E. & Geva, E. (1983). The development of cohesive use of adversative conjunctions in discourse. Discourse Processes, 6, 4, 411–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mann, W. C. & Thompson, S. A. (1988). Rhetorical structure theory: a theory of text organisation. In L. Polanyi (ed.).Google Scholar

Martlew, M. (ed.) (1983). The psychology of written language. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Mellon, J. C. (1969). Transformational sentence-combining: a method for enhancing the development of syntactic fluency in English composition, NCTE Research Report No. 10. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Mellon, J. C. & Kinneavy, J. (1979). Issues in the theory and practice of sentence combining: 20-year perspective. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar

Meyer, B. J. F. (1975). The organisation of prose and its effects on memory. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar

Meyer, B. J. F. (1985). Prose analysis: purposes, procedures, and problems (part II). In B. K. Britton & J. B. Black (eds.), 269–97.Google Scholar

Michaels, S. (1987). Text and context: a new approach to the study of classroom writing. Discourse Processes, 10, 4, 321–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Miller, S. (1979). Rhetorical maturity: definition and development. Paper given at the Carleton Conference on Learning to Write (CCTE), Canada, May 1979.Google Scholar

Monaghan, J. (ed.) (1987). Grammar in the construction of texts. London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar

Monroe, J. H. (1975). Measuring and enhancing syntactic maturity in French. French Review, 6, 1023–31.Google Scholar

Morenberg, M., Daiker, D. & Kerek, A. (1978). Sentence combining at the college level: an experimental study. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 245–56.Google Scholar

Morrissey, M. D. (1979 and 1980). A rule-based description of noun-phrase errors. Moderne Sprachen, 23, 7–18 (part 1) and 24, 1–16 (part 2).Google Scholar

Morrissey, M. D. (1981). Learners' errors and linguistic description. Lingua, 54, 277–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mosenthal, P., Tamor, L. & Walmsley, S. A. (1983). Research on writing. Principles and methods. New York and London: Longman.Google Scholar

Mulder, J. E. M., Braun, C. & Holliday, W. G. (1978). Effects of sentence-combining practice on linguistic maturity level of adult students. Adult Education, 28, 111–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mullin, A. E. (1990). Errors as discourse of an other. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (41st, Chicago, ILL, March 22–24, 1990).Google Scholar

Neuner, J. L. (1987). Cohesive ties and chains in good and poor freshman essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 1, 92–103.Google Scholar

Ney, J. W. (1966). Review of Grammatical structures written at three grade levels (Hunt, K. W.). Language Learning, 16, 130–5.Google Scholar

Nietzke, D. A. (1972). The influence of composition assignment upon grammatical structure. DAI 32: 5746–A.Google Scholar

Nold, E. W. & Freedman, S. W. (1977). An analysis of readers' responses to essays. Research in the Teaching of English, 11, 164–74.Google Scholar

Nold, E. W. & Davis, B. E. (1980). The discourse matrix. College Composition and Communication, 31, 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nystrand, M. (1979). Using readability research to investigate writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 231–42.Google Scholar

Nystrand, M. (1982). An analysis of errors in written communication. In M. Nystrand (ed.).Google Scholar

Nystrand, M. (ed.) (1982) What writers know. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Obenchain, A. (1979). Developing paragraph power through sentence combining. In D. Daiker, A. Kerek & M. Morenberg (eds.).Google Scholar

O'Brien, T. (1987). Predictive items in student writing. In T. Bloor & J. Norrish (eds.), 70–84.Google Scholar

Odell, L. (1977). Measuring changes in intellectual processes as one dimension of growth in writing. In C. R. Cooper & L. Odell (eds.).Google Scholar

O'Donnell, R. C., Griffin, W. J. & Norris, R. C. (1967). Syntax of kindergarten and elementary school children: a transformational analysis. NCTE Research Report No. 8. Champaign, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar

O'Hare, F. (1973). Sentence combining: improving student writing without formal grammar instruction. NCTE Committee on Research Report Series, No. 15. Urbana, ILL: NCTE.Google Scholar

Oller, J. W. Jr., & Perkins, K. (1980). Research in language testing. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Onyeberechi, S. E. (1986). Syntactic fluency and cohesive ties in college freshmen writing. Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 08A.Google Scholar

Ostler, S. E. (1987). English in parallels: a comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), 169–85.Google Scholar

Östman, J. O. (ed.) (1978). Cohesion and semantics. Åbo, Finland: Research Institute of the Åbo Akademi Foundation.Google Scholar

Pack, A. C. & Henrischen, L. E. (1980). Sentence combination: writing and combining standard English sentences. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Pavesi, M. (1986). Markedness, discoursal modes and relative clause formation in a formal and an informal context. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 8, 1, 38–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paviolo, E. T. (1980). Spanish structural density score: an index to linguistic maturity. NABE Journal, 5, 1, 17–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perkins, K. (1980). Using objective measures of attained writing proficiency to discriminate among holistic evaluations. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 61–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Perren, G. E. & Trim, J. L. M. (eds.) (1971). Application of linguistics.Google Scholar

Perron, T. D. (1976). The impact of mode on written syntactic complexity: parts I, II, III. Studies in Language Education Reports, No. 24, 25, 27. Athens: Department of Language Education, University of Georgia.Google Scholar

Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (1989). Textual designs: signalling coherence in first and second language academic writing. PhD thesis, University of Lancaster. Now available as Notes et Documents LIMSI no. 91–1, January 1991.Google Scholar

Péry-Woodley, M.-P. (1990). Contrasting discourses: contrastive analysis and a discourse approach to writing. Language Teaching, 23, 3, 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Peters, P. (1986). Getting the theme across: a study of dominant function in the academic writing of university students. In B. Couture (ed.), 169–85.Google Scholar

Piché, G. L. & Roen, D. (1987). Social cognition and writing: interpersonal cognitive complexity and abstractness and the quality of students' persuasive writing. Written Communication, 4, 68–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Polanyi, L. (ed.) (1988). The structure of discourse. Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.Google Scholar

Potter, R. R. (1967). Sentence structure and prose quality. Research in the Teaching of English, 1, 17–28.Google Scholar

Pringle, I. & Freedman, A. (1980). An analysis of the syntactic maturity and writing skills of grade five, eight and twelve student writers. Carleton, Canada: Report for the Carleton Board of Education.Google Scholar

Reed, W. M., Burton, J. K. & Vandett, N. M. (1986). Daly and Miller's writing apprehension test and Hunt's T-unit analyses: two measurement precautions in writing research. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21, 2, 1–8.Google Scholar

Da Rocha, F. J. (1975). On the reliability of error analysis. ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 29, 53–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rogers, M. (1984). On major types of written errors in advanced students of German. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 1–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Romaine, S. (1985). Grammar and style in children's narratives. Linguistics, 23, 1, 83–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, J. (1971). A transformational approach to teaching composition. College Composition and Communication, 22, 179–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ross, S., Rob, T. & Shortreed, I. (1988). First language composition pedagogy in the second language classroom: a reassessment. RELC Journal, 19, 1, 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rubin, D. & Piché, G. (1979). Development in syntactic and strategic aspects of audience adaptation skills in written persuasive communication. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 293–316.Google Scholar

Rutherford, W. E. (1984). Description and explanation in interlanguage syntax: state of the art. Language Learning, 34, 127–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, T. (1987). Markedness theory and error evaluation: an experimental study. Applied Linguistics, 8, 3, 207–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Santos, T. (1988). Professors' reactions to the academic writing of non-native speaking students. TESOL Quarterly, 22, 1, 69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, J. (1974). An error in error analysis. Language Learning, 24, 205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schachter, J. & Celce-Murcia, M. (1977). Some reservations concerning error analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 11, 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Scinto, L. F. M. (1981). The acquisition of functional composition strategies for text. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag (Papiere zur Textlinguistik Band 39).Google Scholar

Scott, M. S. & Tucker, R. G. (1974). Error analysis and English-language strategies of Arab students. Language Learning, 24, 69–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sebeok, T. A. (ed.) (1960). Style in language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stalker, J. W. & Stalker, J. C. (1988). A comparison of pragmatic accommodation of non-native and native speakers in written English. World Englishes, 7, 2, 119–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stewart, M. F. (1978 a). Syntactic maturity from high school to university: a first look. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 37–46.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. F. (1978 b). Freshman sentence combining: a Canadian project. Research in the Teaching of English, 12, 257–68.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. F. (1978 c). Sentence combining and syntactic maturity in first year university. ED 153 240.Google Scholar

Stewart, M. F. & Grobe, C. H. (1979). Syntactic maturity, mechanics of writing, and teachers' quality ratings. Research in the Teaching of English, 13, 207–15.Google Scholar

Stotsky, S. (1975). Sentence-combining as a curricular activity: Its effect on written language development and reading comprehension. Research in the Teaching of English, 9, 30–71.Google Scholar

Sullivan, F. J. (1987). Negotiating expectations: writing and reading placement tests. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication (38th, Atlanta, GA, March 19–21, 1987).Google Scholar

Tadros, A. (1985). Prediction in text. English Language Research. Birmingham: University Printing Section.Google Scholar

Tarone, E. (1979). Interlanguage as chameleon. Language Learning, 29, 181–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tarone, E., Frauenfelder, U. & Selinker, L. (1976). Systematicity/variability and stability/instability in interlanguage systems. In H. Brown (ed.), 93–134.Google Scholar

Taylor, G. (1986). Errors and explanations. Applied Linguistics, 7, 2, 144–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Tierney, R. J. & Mosenthal, J. H. (1981). The cohesion concept's relationship to the conference of text (Technical Report No. 221, Center for the Study of Reading). Champaign, ILL: University of Illinois.Google Scholar

Tierney, R. J. & Mosenthal, J. H. (1983). Cohesion and textual coherence. Research in the Teaching of English, 17, 215–30.Google Scholar

Truus, S. (1972). Sentence construction in English and Swedish in the writings of Swedish students of English at university level: a pilot study. Projektet språkfärdighet i engelska (SPRENG), Report No. 7. Göteborgs University.Google Scholar

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1982 a). Functional sentence perspective, composition, and reading. College Composition and Communication, 33, 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1982 b). The given-new strategy of comprehension and some natural expository paragraphs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 11, 501–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vande Kopple, W. J. (1986). Given and new information and some aspects of the structures, semantics, and pragmatics of written texts. In C. R. Cooper & S. Greenbaum (eds.).Google Scholar

Véliz, M. (1988). Evaluación de la madurez sintáctica en el discurso escrito. Revista de la Lingüistica Teórica y Aplicada, 26, 105–41.Google Scholar

Vitale, M. R., King, F. J., Shontz, D. W. & Huntley, G. M. (1971). Effect of sentence-combining exercises upon several restricted written composition tasks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 521–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Watson, C. (1980). The effects of maturity and discourse type on the written syntax of superior high school seniors and upper level college English majors, DAI 41: 3979–A.Google Scholar

Watson, C. (1983). Syntactic change: writing development and the rhetorical context. In M. Martlew (ed.).Google Scholar

Welyun Yang, A. (1989). Cohesive chains and writing quality. Word, 40, 1/2, 235–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whalen, K. (1988). Pilot study on the nature of difficulties in written expression in a second language: process or product? Bulletin of the Canadian Association for Applied Linguistics, 10, 1, 51–7.Google Scholar

White, E. M. (1985). Teaching and assessing writing. San Francisco, Washington, London: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Wikborg, E. (1985). Unspecified topic in university essays. Text, 5, 4, 359–70.Google Scholar

Williams, J. M. (1979). Defining complexity. College English, 40, 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Winter, E. O. (1982). Towards a contextual grammar of English. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. (1983 a). The reliability of mean T-unit length: some questions for research in written composition. In A. Freedman, I. Pringle & J. Yalden (eds.).Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. (1983 b). Topical structure and writing quality: some possible text-based explanations of readers' judgments of student writing. Visible Language, 17, 2, 177–205.Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. & Davis, A. S. (1980). The stability of T-unit length: a preliminary investigation. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 1, 5–17.Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. & Davis, A. S. (1982). The stability of T-unit length in the written discourse of college freshmen: a second study. Research in the Teaching of English, 16, 1, 71–84.Google Scholar

Witte, S. P. & Faigley, L. L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Witte, S. P. & Sodowsky, R. E. (1978). Syntactic maturity in the writing of college freshmen. Paper, Annual Meeting of CCCC, ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills ED 163 460.Google Scholar

Woodley, M.-P. (1983). From complex sentences to coherent discourse. Lenguas Modernas, 9/10, 37–47.Google Scholar

Woodley, M.-P. (1985). Grammaire de texte et apprentissage de l'écrit. Français dans le Monde, 192, 60–5.Google Scholar

Woodley, M.-P. (1987). Non-nativeness in second language texts: the syntax factor. In T. Bloor and J. Norrish (eds.), 130–42.Google Scholar

Yde, P. & Spoelders, M. (1985). Text cohesion: an exploratory study with beginning writers. Applied Psycholinguistics, 6, 4, 407–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Zamel, V. (1980). Re-evaluating sentence-combining practice. TESOL Quarterly, 14, 1, 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar