Hostname: page-component-6587cd75c8-gglxz Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2025-04-24T02:36:11.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BE variation in Sri Lankan English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 May 2005

Manel Herat
Manel Herat
Affiliation:
Liverpool Hope University College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The focus of this article is zero copula use in Sri Lankan English speech. Zero copula use has been at the heart of variationist studies, but has received little attention in New English studies because of its limited use in these varieties. In this article I look at zero copula in Sri Lankan English to determine whether the patterns of use parallel those of AAVE, Caribbean Creoles, or other copula studies on varieties of English including New Englishes. The theoretical issue raised in this article is whether zero copula use in Sri Lankan English can be seen as both a creole-like feature and an optional syntactic feature of those who use English a lot, but for whom it is not a native language, or as a substratal influence in language shift. The variable findings for present tense BE demonstrate that speakers of Sri Lankan English make only limited use of BE absence. BE absence appears to be optional in certain environments where Standard English would require the are copula/auxiliary. Zero copula use in Sri Lankan English speech is especially interesting because Sri Lankan English emerged from an educational background and not from a creole setting. However, the linguistic data for zero copula use in Sri Lankan English suggests that the type of complement and the preceding phonological environment play a significant role on zero copula use, which is comparable to that of other varieties of English, focusing on the study of BE absence.A shorter version of this article was presented under a different title at the Triangle Colloquium on Literature and Linguistics held at the University of Sheffield, UK on September 30, 2000. I wish to gratefully acknowledge the excellent comments and insights provided by the two journal reviewers on earlier drafts of this article. Any shortcomings that exist are my own. I would like to dedicate this work to Dr. Anthea Fraser Gupta (University of Leeds) and Prof. Siromi Fernando (University of Colombo).

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , July 2005 , pp. 181 - 208
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, Roger W. (1983). Pidginization and creolization as language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
Baugh, John. (1979). Linguistic style shifting in Black English. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Bailey, Guy, & Maynor, Natalie. (1985). The present tense of be in White folk speech of the Southern United States. English World-Wide 6:199–216.Google Scholar
Bell, Alan. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society 13:145–204.Google Scholar
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan, & Finegan, Edward. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.
Bickerton, Derek. (1971). Inherent variability and variable rules. Foundations of Language 7:457–492.Google Scholar
Bickerton, Derek. (1972). The structure of polylectal grammars. In Roger W. Shuy (ed.), Twenty-third annual round table. Sociolinguistics: Current trends and prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 17–42.
Bickerton, Derek. (1986). Beyond roots: The five year test. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 1(2):225–232.Google Scholar
Blake, Renee. (1997). Defining the envelope of linguistic variation: The case of “don't count” forms in the copula analysis of African American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 9:57–79.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan. (2001). Phonology and language use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
De Silva Chandra, Richard, & De Silva, Daya. (1990). Education in Sri Lanka 1948–1988: An analysis of the structure and a critical survey of the literature. New Delhi: Navrang.
Education in Ceylon: A centenary volume. (1969). Colombo, Sri Lanka: University of Colombo.
Fasold, Ralph W., & Wolfram, Walt. (1970). Some linguistics features of Negro Dialect. In Ralph W. Fasold & Roger W. Shuy (eds), Teaching standard English in the inner city. Washington, DC: Centre for Applied Linguistics. 41–86.
Fasold, Ralph W., & Nakano, Yoshiko. (1996). Contraction and deletion in African American Vernacular English: Creole history and relationship to Euro-American English. In Gregory R. Guy, Crawford Feagin, Deborah Schiffrin, & John Baugh (eds.), Towards a social science of language: Papers in honour of William Labov. Amsterdam: Benjamins. 373–395.
Feagin, Crawford. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Fernando, Antoinette. (1986). Culture and communicative competence: A study of ESL at the tertiary level in Sri Lanka. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Fernando, Chitra. (1977). English and Sinhala bilingualism in Sri Lanka. Language in Society 6:341–360.Google Scholar
Gair, James W. (1998). Studies in South Asian linguistics: Sinhala and other South Asian languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gupta, Anthea Fraser. (1994). The step tongue. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Gupta, Anthea Fraser. (2000). Marketing the voice of authenticity: A comparison of Ming Cher and Rex Shelley. Language and Literature 9:150–169.Google Scholar
Hannah, Dawn. (1997). Copula absence in Samana English: Implications for research on the linguistic history of African-American vernacular English. American Speech 72(3):339–372.Google Scholar
Ho, Mian-Lian, & Platt, John T. (1993). Dynamics of a contact continuum: Singaporean English. Oxford: Clarendon.
Holm, John. (1984). Variability of the copula in Black English and its creole kin. American Speech 59(4):291–309.Google Scholar
Jackson, K. David. (1990). Sing Without Shame: Oral traditions in Indo-Portuguese creole verse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRef
Kandiah, Thiru. (1979). Disinherited Englishes: The Case of Lankan English. Navasilu 3:75–89.Google Scholar
Kandiah, Thiru. (1981). Lankan English Schizoglossia. English World-Wide 2(1):63–81.Google Scholar
Kandiah, Thiru. (1996). Syntactic “deletion” in Lankan English: Learning from a new variety of English about _________. In Robert J. Baumgardner (ed.), South Asian English: Structure, use and users. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. 104–123.
Kearney, Robert. (1967). Communalism and language in the politics of Ceylon. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Krapp, G. (1924). The English of the Negro. American Mercury 2:190–195.Google Scholar
Krapp, G. (1925). The English language in America. New York: Century.
Kurath, Hans. (1928). The origin of dialectal differences in spoken American English. Modern Philology 25:285–295.Google Scholar
Kurath, Hans. (1949). A word geography of the Eastern United States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Labov, William. (1969). Contraction, deletion and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:715–762.Google Scholar
Labov, William. (1972). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Labov, William. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (eds.), Language in use: Readings in Sociolinguistics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. 28–54.
McElhinny, Bonny. (1993). Copula and auxiliary contraction by white speakers of English. American Speech 62:291–314.Google Scholar
Mesthrie, Rajend. (1992). English in language shift: The history, structure, and sociolinguistics of South African Indian English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Montgomery, Michael. (1992). The pace of change in Appalachian English. In Matti Rissanen, Ossi Ihalainen, Terttu Nevalainen, & Irma Taavitsainen (eds.), History of Englishes: New methods and interpretations in historical linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 624–639.
Mufwene, Salikoko. (1996). The founder principle in creole genesis. Diachronica 3:83–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parakrama, Arjuna. (1995). De-hegemonizing Language Standards: Learning from (post) colonial Englishes about ‘English.’ London: Macmillan.CrossRef
Passé, H. A. (1948). A history of English in Ceylon. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of London.
Platt, John T., & Weber, Heidi. (1980). English in Singapore and Malaysia: Status, features, functions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Platt, John, Weber, Heidi, & Ho, Mian Lian. (1984). The New Englishes. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Rickford, John R. (1998). The creole origins of African American vernacular English: Evidence from copula absence. In Salikoko S. Mufwene, John Rickford, Guy Bailey, & John Baugh (eds), African American English: Structure, history and use. London: Routledge.
Rickford, John R. (1999). African American Vernacular English. Malden: Blackwell.
Rickford, John R., Ball, Arnetha, Blake, Renee, Jackson, Raina, & Martin, Naomi. (1991). Rappin on the copula coffin: Theoretical and methodological issues in the analysis of copula variation in African-American Vernacular English. Language Variation and Change 3:103–132.Google Scholar
Romaine, Suzanne. (1982). Socio-historical linguistics: Its status and methodology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Schneider, Edgar W. (2003). The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity to construction to dialect birth. Language 79(2):233–281.Google Scholar
Silva, Neluka. (1997). Gender and nation in selected contemporary writing from Sri Lanka, India and Pakistan. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, University of Leeds.
Singler, John Victor. (1991). Copula variation in Liberian Settler English and American Black English. In W. F. Edwards & D. Winford (eds.), Verb phrase patterns in Black English and Creole. Detroit: Wayne State University Press. 129–164.
Stewart, William. (1969). Historical and structural bases for the recognition of Negro dialect. In James E. Altalis (ed), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. 239–247.
Wolfram, Walt. (1969). A study of Detroit Negro English. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
Wolfram, Walt. (1974). The relationship of White Southern Speech to Vernacular Black English. Language 50:498–527.Google Scholar