Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-jrqft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:24:44.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Role of Dialect Experience in Topic-Based Shifts in Speech Production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2019

Abby Walker
Abby Walker*
Affiliation:
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An individual's language can change in the moment due to the topic of conversation and over time because of regional mobility. This paper investigates the relationship between these two types of shifts by asking whether speakers with substantial second dialect exposure change their pronunciation more when the topic changes in a regionally meaningful way compared to speakers with less exposure. Specifically, topic-based shifts on three phonological variables that differ between British and US English are investigated in native speakers of both dialects as a function of the migrant status of the speaker. Experience matters in that speakers only shift between variants in their repertoire, and expatriates have acquired some second dialect features that nonmigrants do not have. However, it does not appear that more exposure to, or increased rates of usage of a variant leads to more topic-based shifting toward that variant. These findings, interpreted within the existing literature, suggest that topic-based shifts are driven primarily by stereotypical sociolinguistic representations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Language Variation and Change , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , July 2019 , pp. 135 - 163
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Thanks to: the generous participants; RAs Sara Cuschleg, Shikha Saxena, Ashley Rambacher, Shannon Melvin, and especially Yourdanis Sedarous; my dissertation committee Kathryn Campbell-Kibler, Cynthia Clopper, Don Winford, and Mary Beckman; Bronwen Evans and UCL for interview space in England; audiences at NWAV (Chicago, October 2014), GURT (DC, March 2015), and LSNZ (Wellington, NZ, March 2016); the anonymous reviewers. This work was funded by an NSF DDIG (BCS 1323897).

References

REFERENCES

Baese-Berk, M. (2010). An Examination of the Relationship Between Speech Perception and Production. PhD dissertation, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Becker, K. (2009). /r/ and the construction of place identity on New York City's Lower East Side. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 13(5):634–58.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13:145–204.Google Scholar
Bell, A.. (2001). Back in style: Reworking audience design. In Eckert, P. & Rickford, J. (Eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2009). Language, asylum, and the national order. Current Anthropology 50(4): 415–41.Google Scholar
Bowie, D. (2000). The Effect of Geographic Mobility on the Retention of a Local Dialect. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. (2000). The Phonology of the Lexicon: Evidence from Lexical Diffusion. In Barlow, M. and Kemmer, S. (Eds.), Usage-Based Models of Language. Stanford: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Callary, R. E. (1975). Phonological change and the development of an urban dialect in Illinois. Language in Society 4:155–69.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, K. (2016). Towards a cognitively realistic model of meaningful sociolinguistic variation. In Babel, A. (Ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chambers, J. K. (1992). Dialect acquisition. Language 68:673–705.Google Scholar
Clopper, C.G. (2011). Checking for reliability. In Di Paolo, M. & Yaeger-Dror, M. (Eds.), Sociophonetics; A Student's Guide. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. (Key Topics in Sociolinguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
D'Onofrio, A. (2015). Persona-based information shapes linguistic perception: Valley Girls and California vowels. Journal of Sociolinguistics 19(2): 241–56.Google Scholar
De Jong, K. (1998). Stress-related variation in the articulation of coda alveolar stops: flapping revisited. Journal of Phonetics 26:283–310.Google Scholar
Docherty, G. J. & Foulkes, P. (1999). Instrumental phonetics and phonological variation: case studies from Newcastle upon Tyne and Derby. In Foulkes& G, P.. Docherty, J. (Eds.), Urban Voices: Accent Studies in the British Isles, 47–71. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Drager, K., Hay, J., & Walker, A. (2010). Pronounced rivalries: Attitudes and speech production. Te Reo, 53:27–53.Google Scholar
Drager, K., & Kirtley, J. (2016). Awareness, saliences, and stereotypes in exemplar-based models of speech production and perception. In Babel, A. (Ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.Google Scholar
Evans, B. G., & Iverson, P. (2007). Plasticity in vowel perception and production: A study of accent change in young adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121:3814–26.Google Scholar
Foreman, A. (2003). Pretending to be Someone You're Not: A Study of Second Dialect Acquisition in Australia. PhD dissertation, Monash University.Google Scholar
Foulkes, P. & Docherty, G. (2006). The social life of phonetics and phonology. Journal of Phonetics 34(4):409–38.Google Scholar
German, J. S., Carlson, K., & Pierrehumbert, J. (2013). Reassignment of consonant allophones in rapid dialect acquisition. Journal of Phonetics, 41: 228–48.Google Scholar
Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review 105:251–79.Google Scholar
Gupta, A.F. (2005). Bath and becks. English Today 21(1): 21–27.Google Scholar
Hagiwara, R. (1995). Acoustic realizations of American /r/ as produced by women and men. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 90:1–187.Google Scholar
Hashimoto, D. (2019). Sociolinguistic effects on loanword phonology: Topic in speech and cultural image. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 11.Google Scholar
Hay, J. & Drager, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics 48(4): 865–92.Google Scholar
Hay, J. & Foulkes, P. (2016) The evolution of medial (-t-) in real and remembered time. Language 92(2): 298–330.Google Scholar
Hay, J., Pierrehumbert, J., Walker, A. & LaShell, P. (2015). Tracking word frequency effects through 130 years of sound change. Cognition 139: 83–91.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. (2001). “Style” as distinctiveness: the culture and ideology of linguistic differentiation. In Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. (Eds.), Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Philadelphia University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S. & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, Phonology and Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R. & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1): 159–74.Google Scholar
Le Page, R. B., & Tabouret-Keller, A. (1985). Acts of identity: Creole-based approaches to language and ethnicity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, Y. (2018). Stylistic Variation and Social Perception in Second Dialect Acquisition. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Lobanov, B. (1971). Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49:606–08.Google Scholar
Love, J. & Walker, A. (2013). Football versus football: Effect of topic on /r/ realization in American and English sports fans. Language and Speech 56(4): 443–60.Google Scholar
McGowan, K. (2016). Sounding Chinese and listening Chinese: Awareness and knowledge in the library, In Babel, A. (Ed.), Awareness and Control in Sociolinguistic Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, N., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (2003). Probabilistic sociolinguistics: Beyond variable rules. In Bod, R., Hay, J., & Jannedy, S. (Eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics. Malden: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., Milroy, L., Hartley, S., & Walshaw, D. (1994). Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 6: 327–57.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. A. (1999). The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Social Psychology 18(1): 62–85.Google Scholar
Niedzielski, N. A.. (2010). Linguistic security, ideology, and vowel perception. In Preston, D. R. & Niedzielski, N. (Eds.), Sociophonetics: A Reader. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nycz, J. (2018). Stylistic variation among mobile speakers: Using old and new regional variables to construct complex place identity. Language Variation and Change 30(20): 175–202.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E. & Barney, H. L. (1952) Control methods used in the study of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 24:175–84.Google Scholar
Piercy, C. & Britain, D. (2011). A cross-dialectal transatlantic perspective on non-prevocalic /r/. Paper presented at NWAV 40, Georgetown University, October.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J. (2001). Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition and contrast. In Bybee, J. & Hopper, P. (Eds.), Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure, 137–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Rampton, B. (1995). Crossing. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Rickford, J. & McNair-Knox, F. (1994). Addressee- and topic-influenced style shift: A quantitative sociolinguistic study. In Biber, D. & Finegan, E. (Eds.), Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Register, 235–74. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Riehl, A. K. (2003). American English flapping: Perceptual and acoustic evidence against paradigm uniformity with phonetic features. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 15:271–337.Google Scholar
Sanchez, K., Hay, J. & Nilson, E. (2015). Contextual activaton of Australian English can effect New Zealanders’ vowel productions. Journal of Phonetics 48:76–95.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. (2004). Adolescents, young adults, and the critical period: Two case studies from Seven Up. In Fought, C. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic Variation: Critical Reflections, 121–39. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sankoff, G. & Blondeau, H. (2007). Language across the lifespan: /r/ in Montreal French. Language, 83:560–88.Google Scholar
Sharma, D. (2011). Style repertoire and social change in British Asian English. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 15(4): 464–92.Google Scholar
Sharma, D.. (2018). Style dominance: Attention, audience, and the ‘real me.’ Language in Society, 47(1):1–31.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (2010). Second Dialect Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication 23: 193–229.Google Scholar
Sneller, B., & Roberts, G. (2018) Why some behaviors spread while others don't: A laboratory simulation of dialect contact. Cognition 170C: 298–311.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. (1998). Acoustic Phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sumner, M. & Samuel, A. (2009). The role of experience in the processing of cross-dialectal variation. Journal of Memory and Language 60: 487–501.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. R. & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. [Online resource: http://lingtools.uoregon.edu/norm/norm1_methods.php]. Retrieved Sept. 6th 2018.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1984). Language in the British Isles. Cambrdige: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P.. (1986). Dialects in Contact. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Walker, A. (2014). Crossing oceans with voices and ears: Second dialect acquisition and topic-based shifting in production and perception. PhD dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Walker, A.. (2018). The effect of long-term second dialect exposure on sentence transcription in noise. Journal of Phonetics, 71:162–76.Google Scholar
Walker, A. & Campbell-Kibler, K. (2015). An acoustic and perceptual analysis of vocalic convergence in a cross-dialectal shadowing task. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (546): 1–18.Google Scholar
Walker, M., Szakay, A., & Cox, F. (2019). Can kiwis and koalas as cultural primes induce perceptual bias in Australian English speaking listeners? Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology, 10(1), 7.Google Scholar
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yaeger-Dror, M. & Kemp, W. (1992). Lexical classes in Montreal French: the case of E:. Language and Speech, 35: 251–94.Google Scholar
Yuan, J. & Liberman, M. (2008). Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. Proceedings of Acoustics ' 08.Google Scholar
Zue, V. W. & Laferriere, M. (1979). Acoustic study of internal /t,d/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustic Society of America 66(4):1039–50.Google Scholar