Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g5fl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-25T14:41:29.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Plasma beam structure diagnostics in krypton Hall thruster

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2018

Agnieszka Szelecka ,
Maciej Jakubczak  and
Jacek Kurzyna
Agnieszka Szelecka*
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, Hery 23 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
Maciej Jakubczak
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, Hery 23 01-497 Warsaw, Poland Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Koszykowa 75 00-662 Warsaw, Poland
Jacek Kurzyna
Affiliation:
Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, Hery 23 01-497 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Agnieszka Szelecka, Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion, Hery 23 01-497 Warsaw, Poland, E-mail: agnieszka.szelecka@ifpilm.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Krypton Large Impulse Thruster (KLIMT) project was aimed at incremental development and optimization of a 0.5 kW-class plasma Hall Effect Thruster in which, as a propellant, krypton could be used. The final thermally stable version of the thruster (the third one) was tested in the Plasma Propulsion Satellites (PlaNS) laboratory in the Institute of Plasma Physics and Laser Microfusion (IPPLM) in Warsaw as well as in the European Space Agency (ESA) propulsion laboratory in the European Space Research and Technology Centre (ESTEC).

During final measurement campaign, a wide spectrum of parameters was tested. The plasma potential, electron temperature, electron concentration, and electron energy probability function in the far-field plume of the thruster were measured with a single cylindrical Langmuir probe. Faraday probes were used for recording local values of ion current. Using several collectors in different locations and moving them on the surface of a sphere, the angular distribution of the expelled particles was reconstructed which was a local measure of beam divergence. Angular distribution of ion flux as measured with a central Faraday probe was parameterized with krypton mass flow rate, voltage, coil current ratio, and the cathode mass flow rate. Beam divergence measurements with Faraday probes as well as plasma parameters derived from Langmuir probe seem to be consistent with our understanding of the operating envelope. Obtained results will serve as a baseline in the design of plasma beam structure diagnostics system for the PlaNS laboratory.

Keywords

Beam divergenceFaraday probekrypton Hall thrusterLangmuir probeplasma diagnostics
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 36 , Issue 2 , June 2018 , pp. 219 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boeuf, JP (2017) Tutorial: physics and modeling of Hall thrusters. Journal of Applied Physics 121, 011101.Google Scholar
Brown, DL (2009) Investigation of Low Discharge Voltage Hall Thruster Characteristics and Evaluation of Loss Mechanisms. (PhD Thesis). University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Chen, FF (2003) Lecture notes on Langmuir probe diagnostics, mini-course on plasma diagnostics. IEEE-ICOPS Meeting.Google Scholar
Chen, FF, Evans, JD and Arnush, D (2002) A floating potential method for measuring ion density. Physics of Plasmas 9, 1449.Google Scholar
Conde, L (2011) An introduction to Langmuir probe diagnostics of plasmas. Available online at http://plasmalab.aero.upm.es/~lcl/PlasmaProbes/Probes-2010-2.pdf (accessed 18 June 2018).Google Scholar
Dannenmayer, K, Kudrna, P, Tichy, M and Mazzoufre, S (2009) Time-resolved measurement of plasma parameters in the far-field plume of a low-power Hall effect thruster. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 21, 055020.Google Scholar
Druyvesteyn, MJ (1930) Der Niedervoltbogen. Zeitschrift für Physik 64, 781.Google Scholar
Godyak, VA and Alexandrovich, BM (2015) Comparative analyses of plasma probe diagnostics techniques. Journal of Applied Physics 118, 233302.Google Scholar
Godyak, VA and Demidov, VI (2011) Probe measurements of electron-energy distributions in plasmas: what can we measure and how can we achieve reliable results? Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics 44, 233001.Google Scholar
Goebel, DM and Katz, I (2008) Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kurzyna, J, Barral, S, Daniłko, D, Miedzik, J, Bulit, A and Dannenmayer, K (2014) First tests of the KLIMT Thruster with Xenon propellant at the ESA propulsion laboratory. Space Propulsion 2014 Proceeding.Google Scholar
Kurzyna, J, Szelecka, A, Daniłko, D, Barral, S, Dannenmayer, K, Bosch Borras, E and Schönherr, T (2016) Testing KLIMT prototypes at IPPLM and ESA propulsion laboratories. Space Propulsion 2016 Proceeding.Google Scholar
Lobbia, RB and Gallimore, AD (2010) Temporal limits of a rapidly swept Langmuir probe. Physics of Plasmas 17, 073502.Google Scholar
Merlino, RL (2007) Understanding Langmuir probe current-voltage characteristics. American Journal of Physics 75, 12.Google Scholar
Morozov, AI (2003) The conceptual development of stationary plasma thrusters. Plasma Physics Reports 29, 235.Google Scholar
Raites, Y, Staack, D, Smirnov, A and Fisch, NJ (2005) Space charge saturated sheath regime and electron temperature saturation in Hall thrusters. Physics of Plasmas 12, 073507.Google Scholar
Steinbruchel, C (1990) A new method for analyzing Langmuir probe data and the determination of ion densities and etch yields in an etching plasma. Journalof Vacuum Science & Technology A 8, 1663.Google Scholar
Szelecka, A, Kurzyna, J and Bourdain, L (2017) Thermal stability of the krypton Hall effect thruster. NUKLEONIKA 62, 9–15.Google Scholar
Zhurin, VV, Kaufman, HR and Robinson, RS (1999) Physics of closed drift thrusters. Plasma Sources Science and Technology 8, R1–R20.Google Scholar