Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T22:55:35.321Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polarization of atomic radiative transitions in crossed electric and magnetic fields

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2009

V.L. Jacobs
Affiliation:
Condensed Matter and Radiation Sciences Division, Code 6693, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC 20375–5345
A.B. Filuk
Affiliation:
Target and Analysis Theory Department, Organization 1271, MS 1187, Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, Albuquerque, NM 87185–1187

Abstract

A density-matrix approach is under development for the investigation of the angular distribution and polarization of atomic radiative emissions in crossed quasi-static electric and magnetic fields. Particular interest has centered on applications to spectroscopic observations in the intense fields of the high-power light-ion inertial fusion device PBFA II at Sandia National Laboratories, and to magnetic field measurements in tokamak plasmas. Noteworthy features of our general density-matrix analysis include allowances for the mixing of both the bound and continuum field-free atomic eigenstates in an arbitrary arrangement of electric and magnetic fields, and for the possible coherent excitation of the nearly degenerate field-dependent atomic substates that produce the overlapping Stark-Zeeman components. The influence of directed collisional excitation may also be taken into account. From the angular-momentum selection rules, specific results have been obtained for observation of polarized radiative emissions in the direction of the magnetic field.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, J.E. et al. 1990 Rev. Sci. Inst 61, 3075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blum, K. 1981 Density Matrix Theory and Applications (Plenum, New York).Google Scholar
Cowan, R.D. 1981 The Theory of Atomic Structure and Spectra (University of California Press, Berkeley).Google Scholar
Fano, U. 1957 Rev. Mod. Phys. 29, 74.Google Scholar
Fano, U. & Racah, G. 1959 Irreducible Tensorial Sets (Academic Press, New York).Google Scholar
Feldman, U. et al. 1984 J. Appl. Phys. 56, 2512.Google Scholar
Happer, W. 1968 Ann. Phys. 48, 579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L.K. et al. 1989, Phys. Rev. A 40, 5224.Google Scholar
Inal, M. & Dubau, J. 1987 J. Phys. B 20, 4221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, V.L. 1972 J. Phys. B 6, 1461.Google Scholar
Jacobs, V.L. & Seely, J.F. 1987 Phys. Rev. A 36, 3267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarid, E. et al. 1993 Phys. Rev. E 48, 1364.Google Scholar
Van Devender, J.P. & Cook, D.L. 1986 Science 232, 831.Google Scholar