Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T03:42:02.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Emission properties of suprathermal electrons produced by laser–plasma interactions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Huiya Liu ,
Ning Kang ,
Shenlei Zhou ,
Honghai An ,
Zhiheng Fang ,
Jun Xiong ,
Kun Li ,
Anle Lei  and
Zunqi Lin
Huiya Liu
Affiliation:
Joint Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
Ning Kang
Affiliation:
Joint Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100049, China
Shenlei Zhou
Affiliation:
Joint Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
Honghai An
Affiliation:
Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai 201800, China
Zhiheng Fang
Affiliation:
Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai 201800, China
Jun Xiong
Affiliation:
Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai 201800, China
Kun Li
Affiliation:
Joint Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
Anle Lei*
Affiliation:
Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai 201800, China
Zunqi Lin*
Affiliation:
Joint Laboratory on High Power Laser and Physics, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
*
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Anle. Lei, Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai, 201800, China, E-mail: LAL@siom.ac.cn; Zunqi Lin, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, China, E-mail: zqlin@mail.shcnc.ac.cn.
*Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Anle. Lei, Shanghai Institute of Laser Plasma, China Academy of Engineering Physics, Shanghai, 201800, China, E-mail: LAL@siom.ac.cn; Zunqi Lin, Shanghai Institute of Optics and Fine Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 201800, China, E-mail: zqlin@mail.shcnc.ac.cn.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Suprathermal electrons produced by laser–plasma interactions at 0.53-μm laser wavelength have been investigated using 19 electron spectrometers. The targets were 2- and 10-μm-thick Al foils, while the laser average intensities were 2 × 1013 and 7 × 1014 W/cm2. A double temperature distribution was observed in the electron energy spectrum: the lower electron temperature was below 25 keV, whereas the higher was ~50 keV. The angular distribution of the total suprathermal electron energy approximately obeyed the Gaussian distribution, peaking along the k vector of the incident laser beam for perpendicular incidence. Furthermore, the conversion rate of laser energy into escaped suprathermal electron energy over the π sr solid angle was ~10−4 at $\sim \!\!10^{14} \; {\rm W}/{\rm c}{\rm m}^{\rm 2}$, increasing almost linearly with the laser intensity.

Keywords

inertial confinement fusionlaser–plasma interactionslaser-produced plasmasuprathermal electron
Type
Research Article
Information
Laser and Particle Beams , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , December 2017 , pp. 663 - 669
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bezzerides, B., Gitomer, S. & Forslund, D. (1980). Randomness, Maxwellian distributions, and resonance absorption. Physical Review Letters 44, 651–654.Google Scholar
Campbell, E.M., Goncharov, V.N., Sangster, T.C., Regan, S.P., Radha, P.B., Betti, R., Myatt, J.F., Froula, D.H., Rosenberg, M.J. & Igumenshchev, I.V. (2017). Laser-direct-drive program: promise, challenge, and path forward. Matter & Radiation at Extremes 2, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craxton, R., Anderson, K., Boehly, T., Goncharov, V., Harding, D., Knauer, J., McCrory, R., McKenty, P., Meyerhofer, D. & Myatt, J. (2015). Direct-drive inertial confinement fusion: a review. Physics of Plasmas 22, 110501.Google Scholar
Drake, R.P., Turner, R.E., Lasinski, B.F., Estabrook, K.G., Campbell, E.M., Wang, C.L., Phillion, D.W., Williams, E.A. & Kruer, W.L. (1984). Efficient Raman sidescatter and hot-electron production in laser-plasma interaction experiments. Physical Review Letters 53, 1739–1742.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, N.A., Baldis, H.A., Joshi, C. & Benesch, R. (1980). Hot electron generation by the two-plasmon decay instability in the laser-plasma interaction at 10.6 µm. Physical Review Letters 45, 1179–1182.Google Scholar
Estabrook, K., Kruer, W. & Lasinski, B. (1980). Heating by Raman backscatter and forward scatter. Physical Review Letters 45, 1399–1403.Google Scholar
Fraley, G. & Mason, R. (1975). Preheat effects on microballoon laser-fusion implosions. Physical Review Letters 35, 520–523.Google Scholar
Gao, L., Nilson, P.M., Igumenschev, I.V., Hu, S.X., Davies, J.R., Stoeckl, C., Haines, M.G., Froula, D.H., Betti, R. & Meyerhofer, D.D. (2012). Magnetic field generation by the Rayleigh-Taylor instability in laser-driven planar plastic targets. Physical Review Letters 109, 115001.Google Scholar
Kawrakow, I. & Rogers, D. (2000). The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport. NRCC Report No. PIRS-701, National Research Council of Canada.Google Scholar
Kruer, W.L. (1988). The Physics of Laser Plasma Interactions. Redwood City, CA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Langdon, A.B., Lasinski, B.F. & Kruer, W.L. (1979). Nonlinear saturation and recurrence of the two-plasmon decay instability. Physical Review Letters 43, 133–136.Google Scholar
Lindl, J. (1995). Development of the indirect-drive approach to inertial confinement fusion and the target physics basis for ignition and gain. Physics of Plasmas 2, 3933–4024.Google Scholar
Liu, H., An, H., Shen, J., Kang, N., Zhou, S., Lei, A. & Lin, Z. (2017). Design and calibration of hot-electron spectrometer array for angle-resolved measurement. Review of Scientific Instruments 88, 520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maddox, B., Park, H., Remington, B., Izumi, N., Chen, S., Chen, C., Kimminau, G., Ali, Z., Haugh, M. & Ma, Q. (2011). High-energy x-ray backlighter spectrum measurements using calibrated image plates. Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 023111.Google Scholar
Perkins, L.J., Betti, R., LaFortune, K. & Williams, W. (2009). Shock ignition: a new approach to high gain inertial confinement fusion on the National Ignition Facility. Physical Review Letters 103, 045004.Google Scholar
Riconda, C. & Weber, S. (2016). Raman–Brillouin interplay for inertial confinement fusion relevant laser–plasma interaction. High Power Laser Science and Engineering 4, e23.Google Scholar
Rousseaux, C., Amiranoff, F., Labaune, C. & Matthieussent, G. (1992). Suprathermal and relativistic electrons produced in laser–plasma interaction at 0.26, 0.53, and 1.05 µm laser wavelength. Physics of Fluids B 4, 2589–2595.Google Scholar
Shen, J., An, H.H., Liu, H.Y., Remnev, G.E., Nashilevskiy, A.V., Li, D.Y., Zhang, J., Zhong, H.W., Cui, X.J. & Liang, G.Y. (2016). Energy spectrum analysis for intense pulsed electron beam. Laser and Particle Beams 34, 742–747.Google Scholar
Tanaka, K.A., Yabuuchi, T., Sato, T., Kodama, R., Kitagawa, Y., Takahashi, T., Ikeda, T., Honda, Y. & Okuda, S. (2005). Calibration of imaging plate for high energy electron spectrometer. Review of Scientific Instruments 76, 13507–13507.Google Scholar
Tanimoto, T., Ohta, K., Habara, H., Yabuuchi, T., Kodama, R., Tampo, M., Zheng, J. & Tanaka, K.A. (2008). Use of imaging plates at near saturation for high energy density particles. Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 10E910.Google Scholar
Theobald, W., Nora, R., Seka, W., Lafon, M., Anderson, K.S., Hohenberger, M., Marshall, F.J., Michel, D.T., Solodov, A.A. & Stoeckl, C. (2015). Spherical strong-shock generation for shock-ignition inertial fusion. Physics of Plasmas 22, 155001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villeneuve, D., Keck, R., Afeyan, B., Seka, W. & Williams, E. (1984). Production of hot electrons by two-plasmon decay instability in UV laser plasmas. Physics of Fluids 27, 721–725.Google Scholar
Vu, H., DuBois, D., Russell, D. & Myatt, J. (2010). The reduced-description particle-in-cell model for the two plasmon decay instability. Physics of Plasmas 17, 072701.Google Scholar
Yaakobi, B., Pelah, I. & Hoose, J. (1976). Preheat by fast electrons in laser-fusion experiments. Physical Review Letters 37, 836–839.Google Scholar
Yaakobi, B., Solodov, A., Myatt, J., Delettrez, J., Stoeckl, C. & Froula, D. (2013). Measurements of the divergence of fast electrons in laser-irradiated spherical targets. Physics of Plasmas 20, 092706.Google Scholar