Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:48:31.181Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

OBSIDIAN SUB-SOURCES AT THE ZARAGOZA-OYAMELES QUARRY IN PUEBLA, MEXICO: SIMILARITIES WITH ALTOTONGA AND THEIR DISTRIBUTION THROUGHOUT MESOAMERICA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2017

Charles L. F. Knight ,
Heng Hu ,
Michael D. Glascock  and
Stephen A. Nelson
Charles L. F. Knight
Affiliation:
Consulting Archaeology Program, University of Vermont, 111 Delehanty Hall, Burlington, VT 05405, USA (cknight@uvm.edu)
Heng Hu
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Michael D. Glascock
Affiliation:
University of Missouri Research Reactor, 1513 Research Park Drive, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
Stephen A. Nelson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA 70118, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present data produced through archaeological and geological survey, as well as geochemical analysis of the Zaragoza-Oyameles obsidian source area located on the northern and western flanks of the Los Humeros Caldera in eastern Puebla, Mexico. One result of the intensive archaeological surface survey of this obsidian source area was the identification of 117 obsidian flow-band exposures. Geologic samples from 40 of these were submitted for instrumental neutron activation analysis. Eighty-five projectile points collected from the surface were characterized using portable X-ray fluorescence. These analyses identified three sub-sources: Z-O1, Potreros Caldera, and Gomez Sur. The Gomez Sur sub-source appears chemically similar to the previously identified Altotonga source, located 25 km to the northeast. Results of the geological survey help elucidate the relationship of Altotonga obsidian with the Zaragoza-Oyameles source area. The data from the three sub-sources are compared to all consumer site data attributed to the Zaragoza-Oyameles source in the Missouri University Research Reactor database. Results indicate that the majority of consumer samples throughout Mesoamerica match the Z-O1 sub-source, while 4 percent match the Potreros Caldera sub-source. This information, combined with the Gomez Sur data, is discussed in terms of economic relations with the regional center of Cantona. Obsidian procurement and distribution may have been more nuanced than previously modeled. We suggest that a number of potentially independent communities in addition to Cantona may have been involved in distributing this obsidian throughout Mesoamerica.

En este trabajo se presentan los resultados de un relevamiento arqueológico y geológico y de análisis geoquímicos del área de la fuente de obsidiana Zaragoza-Oyameles, localizada en los flancos norte y oeste de la caldera de Los Humeros, en el oriente del estado de Puebla, México. Uno de los resultados del relevamiento arqueológico intensivo de superficie fue la identificación de 117 bandas expuestas de flujo de obsidiana. De éstas, se sometieron 40 muestras geológicas al análisis instrumental por activación neutrónica. Adicionalmente, se analizó la composición elemental de 85 puntas de proyectil halladas en superficie usando un equipo portátil de fluorescencia de rayos X. Estos análisis identificaron tres sub-fuentes: Z-O1, Potreros Caldera y Gómez Sur. La sub-fuente Gómez Sur es químicamente similar a la fuente de obsidiana previamente identificada de Altotonga, localizada 25 kilómetros hacia el noreste. Los resultados del reconocimiento geológico ayudan a esclarecer la relación entre la obsidiana de Altotonga y la del área de la fuente de Zaragoza-Oyameles. Se comparan los datos de las tres sub-fuentes con la base de datos del University of Missouri Research Reactor, la cual incluye sitios del centro y sureste de México y Guatemala. Los resultados indican que la mayoría de las muestras de artefactos a lo largo de Mesoamérica corresponden a la sub-fuente Z-O1, mientras que el cuatro por ciento corresponde a la sub-fuente Potreros Caldera. Se discute esta información, junto con los datos de la sub-fuente Gómez Sur, en términos de las relaciones económicas con el centro regional de Cantona. Es posible que la adquisición y distribución de obsidiana fueran más importantes para este centro de lo que se pensó antes. La distribución de esta obsidiana a través de Mesoamérica pudo haber involucrado varias estrategias, llevadas a cabo por un número de comunidades potencialmente independientes además de Cantona.

Type
Articles
Information
Latin American Antiquity , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2017 , pp. 46 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © 2017 by the Society for American Archaeology 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References Cited

Balkan-Atli, Nur, Kuhn, Steve, Astruc, Laurence, Kayacan, Nurcan, Dincer, Berkay, Balci, Semra, Ertuaç, Korham, and Grenet, Michel 2011 Göllü Dağ Survey 2010. Anatolia Antiqua XIX:259−278.Google Scholar
Barca, Donatella, Miriello, Domenico, Pecci, Alessandra, Barba, Luis, Ortíz, Augustín, Manzanilla, Linda R., Blancas, Jorge, and Crisci, Gino M. 2013 Provenance of Glass Shards in Archaeological Lime Plasters by LA-ICP-MS: Implications for the Ancient Routes from the Gulf of Mexico to Teotihuacan in Central Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:3999−4008.Google Scholar
Binder, Didier, Gratuze, Bernard, Mouralis, Damase, and Balkan-Atli, Nur 2011 New Investigations of the Göllüdağ Obsidian Lava Flows System: A Multi-disciplinary Approach. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:3174−3184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boksenbaum, Martin W., Tolstoy, Paul, Harbottle, Garman, Kimberlin, Jerome, and Neivens, Mary 1987 Obsidian Industries and Cultural Evolution in the Basin of Mexico before 500 B.C. Journal of Field Archaeology 14 (1):65−75.Google Scholar
Bove, Frederick J., and Busto, Sonia Medrano 2003 Teotihuacan, Militarism, and Pacific, Guatemala. In Teotihuacan, Militarism, and Pacific Guatemala, edited by Braswell, Geoffrey E., pp. 55−79. University of Texas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E. 2003 Obsidian Exchange Spheres. In The Postclassic Mesoamerican World, edited by Smith, Michael E. and Berdan, Frances F., pp. 131−159. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Glascock, Michael D. 1998 Interpreting Intrasource Variation in the Composition of Obsidian: The Geoarchaeology of San Martin Jilotepeque, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 9:353−369.Google Scholar
Carballo, David M. 2011 Obsidian and the Teotihuacan State: Weaponry and Ritual Production at the Moon Pyramid. University of Pittsburgh and UNAM, Pittsburgh and Mexico City.Google Scholar
Carballo, David M., Carballo, Jennifer, and Neff, Hector 2007 Formative and Classic Period Obsidian Procurement in Central Mexico: A Compositional Study Using Laser Ablation-Inductively Coupled Plasma-Mass Spectrometry. Latin American Antiquity 18:27−43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, John E. 2003 A Review of Twentieth-Century Mesoamerican Obsidian Studies. In Mesoamerican Lithic Technology: Experimentation and Interpretation, edited by Hirth, Kenneth G., pp. 15−54. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City.Google Scholar
Cobean, Robert 2002 A World of Obsidian: The Mining and Trade of a Volcanic Glass in Ancient Mexico. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and University of Pittsburgh, Mexico, D.F. and Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Cobean, Robert H., Coe, Michael D., Perry, Edward A. Jr., Turekian, Karl K., and Kharkar, Dinkar P. 1971 Obsidian Trade at San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Mexico. Science 174:666−671.Google Scholar
Cobean, Robert H., Vogt, James R., Glascock, Michael D., and Stocker, Terrence L. 1991 High-Precision Trace-Element Characterization of Major Mesoamerican Obsidian Sources and Further Analysis of Artifacts from San Lorenzo Tenochtitlan, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 2:69−91.Google Scholar
Darras, Véronique 1999 Tecnologías prehispánicas de la obsidiana: Los centros de producción de la región de Zinaparo-Prieto, Michoacán. Centro Francés de Estudios Mexicanos y Centroamericanos, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Drennan, Robert D., Fitzgibbons, Philip T., and Dehn, Heinz 1990 Imports and Exports in Classic Mesoamerican Political Economy: The Tehuacan Valley and Teotihuacan Obsidian Industry. In Research in Economic Anthropology, Vol 12, edited by Isaac, Barry, pp. 177−200. JAI Press, Greenwich, Connecticut.Google Scholar
Ebert, C. E., Dennison, M., Hirth, K. G., McClure, S. B., and Kennett, D. J. 2014 Formative Period Obsidian Exchange along the Pacific Coast of Mesoamerica. Archaeometry 57, Supplement 1:54−73.Google Scholar
Elam, J. Michael 1993 Obsidian Exchange in the Valley of Oaxaca, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri-Columbia. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Esquivias, Chantal 2003 On the Edge of Empire? Settlement Changes in Chacalapan, Southern Veracruz, Mexico, During the Classic and PostClassic Periods. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Archaeology, Boston University. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Ferriz, Horacio 1985 Caltonac, a Prehispanic Obsidian-Mining Center in Eastern Mexico? A Preliminary Report. Journal of Field Archaeology 2 (3):363−370.Google Scholar
Ferriz, Horacio, and Mahood, Gail A. 1984 Eruption Rates and Compositional Trends at Los Humeros Volcanic Center, Puebla, Mexico. Journal of Geophysical Research 89(B10):8511−8524.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel 1967 Análisis tipológico de artefactos. Investigaciones 12, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel 2003 Cantona: The City. In Urbanism in Mesoamerica, Vol. I, edited by Sanders, William T., Mastasche, Alba Guadalupe, and Cobean, Robert H., pp. 311−343. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F., and Pennsylvania State University, Park City.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel 2014 Los “talleres estatales” de Cantona, Puebla. In Estudio de la lítica arqueológica en Mesoamérica, edited by Mirambell, Lorena and Arratia, Leticia González, pp. 105−166. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel, and Carrión, Beatriz Leonor Merino 1998 Cantona: Urbe prehispánica en el altiplano central de México. Latin American Antiquity 9:191−216.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel, Tenoria, Dolores, Jiménez-Reyes, Melania, Monroy-Guzmán, Fabiola, and López-Reyes, Carmen 2010 Estudio de procedencia de obsidiana arqueológica de Cantona, Puebla. Arqueología, Segunda Época 43:217−229.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel, and Serret, Katina Vackimes 2014 Elementos de concha presentes en Cantona, Puebla. Arqueología: Segunda Época 47:216−245.Google Scholar
García Cook, Ángel, and Rivera, Mónica Zamora 2010 Sobre una laja grabada de Cantona: Ubicación temporal y ambiental. Arqueología: Segunda Época 45:33−52.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D., Braswell, Geoffrey E., and Cobean, Robert H. 1998 A Systematic Approach to Obsidian Source Characterization. In Archaeological Obsidian Studies: Method and Theory, edited by Shackley, M. Steven, pp. 15−65. Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
Glascock, Michael D., and Cobean, Robert H. 2002 A summary of Elemental Concentration Data for the Obsidian Source Groups in Mexico. In A World of Obsidian: The Mining and Trade of a Volcanic Glass in Ancient Mexico, edited by Cobean, Robert H., pp. 239−276. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia and University of Pittsburgh, Mexico, D.F. and Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Gómez Santiago, Denisse 2010 Las primeras expresiones alfareras de Cantona. Arqueología: Segunda Época 44:159−178.Google Scholar
Gómez-Tuena, Arturo, Orozco-Esquivel, M. Teresa, and Ferrari, Luca 2007 Igneous Petrogenesis of the Trans-Mexican Volcanic Belt. Geological Society of America Special Paper 422:129−181.Google Scholar
Healan, Dan M. 1997 Pre-Hispanic Quarrying in the Ucareo-Zinapecuaro Obsidian Source Area. Ancient Mesoamerica 8:77−100.Google Scholar
Heller, Lynette 2001 Sources, Technology, Production, Use, and Deposition of Knapped Obsidian. In Classic Period Mixtequilla, Veracruz, Mexico: Diachronic Inferences from Residential Excavations, edited by Stark, Barbara L., pp. 159−170. Monograph 12, Institute for Mesoamerican Studies, University of Albany, New York.Google Scholar
Hirth, Kenneth, Cyphers, Ann, Cobean, Robert, De Léon, Jason, and Glascock, Michael D. 2013 Early Olmec Trade and Economic Organization at San Lorenzo. Journal of Archaeological Science 40:2784−2798.Google Scholar
Jiménez-Reyes, Melania, Tenorio, Dolores, Esparza-Lopez, Juan R., Cruz-Jiménez, Ricardo L., Mandujano, Carlos, and Elizalde, Sandra 2001 Neutron Activation Analysis of Obsidians from Quarries of the Central Quaternary Trans-Mexican Volcanic Axis. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 250 (3):465–471.Google Scholar
Joyce, Arthur A., Elam, J. Michael, Glascock, Michael D., Neff, Hector, and Winter, Marcus 1995 Exchange Implications of Obsidian Source Analysis from the Lower Verde Valley. Latin American Antiquity 6:3−15.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles L. F. 1999 The Late Formative to Classic Period Obsidian Economy at Palo Errado, Veracruz, Mexico. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pittsburgh. University Microfilms, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles L. F. 2015 Reconocimiento regional de la obsidiana en Zaragoza-Oyameles, Puebla, México. Informe de la Temporada de 2014, submitted to the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles L. F. 2017 Zaragoza-Oyameles Obsidian Projectile Points: Catona's Place in Early Classic Period Long Distance Gift Exchange and Interaction. In New Perspectives on Interregional Interaction in Ancient Mesoamerica, edited by Englehardt, Joshua D. and Carraso, Michael D.. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, in press.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles L. F., Cuéllar, Andrea M., Glascock, Michael D., Hall, Minard L., and Mothes, Patricia A. 2011 Obsidian Source Characterization in the Cordillera Real and Eastern Piedmont of the North Ecuadorian Andes. Journal of Archaeological Science 38:1069−1079.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles L. F., and Glascock, Michael D. 2009 The Terminal Formative to Classic Period Obsidian Assemblage at Palo Errado, Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 20:507−524.Google Scholar
Lara Galicia, Aline P. 2003 El yacimiento de Oyameles-Zaragoza en Puebla, México: Evidencias de explotación prehispánica. Tesis Profesional, Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Lara Galicia, Aline P. 2004 Por el camino de Ixte: Explotación, minería y comercio prehispánico en Oyameles-Zaragoza. Editorial Meta4, Jaén.Google Scholar
Manzanilla, Linda R. 2011 Sistemas de control de mano de obra y del intercambio de bienes suntuarios en el corredor teotihuacano hacia la Costa del Golfo en el Clásico. Anales de Antropología 45:9−32.Google Scholar
Milić, Marina 2014 PXRF Characterisation of Obsidian from Central Anatolia, the Aegean, and Central Europe. Journal of Archaeological Science 41:285–296.Google Scholar
Millhauser, John K., Fargher, Lane F., Heredia Espinoza, Verenice Y., and Blanton, Richard E. 2015 The Geopolitics of Obsidian Supply in Postclassic Tlaxcallan: A Portable X-ray Fluorescence Study. Journal of Archaeological Science 58:133–146.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, Asaro, Frank, and Stross, Fred H. 1984 Tikal Obsidians: Sources and Typology. American Antiquity 49:104−117.Google Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, Hattula, Meierhoff, James, Golitko, Mark, and Kestle, Caleb 2013 An Analysis of pXRF Obsidian Source Attributions from Tikal, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity 24:72−97.Google Scholar
Parry, William, J. 2014 Reflections on Reflections. In Obsidian Reflections: Symbolic Dimensions of Obsidian in Mesoamerica, edited by Levine, Marc N. and Carballo, David M., pp. 279–318. University Press of Colorado, Boulder.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastrana, Alejandro 1998 La explotación azteca de la obsidiana en la Sierra de las Navajas. Serie Arqueología, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico, D.F. Google Scholar
Pires-Ferreira, Jane W. 1975 Formative Mesoamerican Exchange Networks with Special Reference to the Valley of Oaxaca. Prehistory and Human Ecology of the Valley of Oaxaca 3, Memoirs of the Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pires-Ferreira, Jane W. 1976 Obsidian Exchange in Formative Mesoamerica. In The Early Mesoamerican Village, edited by Flannery, Kent V., pp. 292–306. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Pool, Christopher A., Knight, Charles L. F., and Glascock, Michael D. 2014 Formative Obsidian Procurement at Tres Zapotes, Veracruz, Mexico: Implications for Olmec and Epi-Olmec Political Economy. Ancient Mesoamerica 25 (1):271–293.Google Scholar
Rademaker, Kurt, Glascock, Michael D., Kaiser, Bruce, Gibson, David, Lux, Daniel R., and Yates, Martin G. 2013 Multi-technique Geochemical Characterization of the Alca Obsidian Source, Peruvian Andes. Geology 41 (7):779–782.Google Scholar
Ramírez Sánchez, Nicolás Felipe 2008 La obsidiana de Laguna de los Cerros: Observaciones diacrónicas sobre intercambio y tecnología. Tesis de Doctorado en Estudios Mesoamericanos, FFyL, IIFilo, UNAM, Mexico.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Cann, J. R., and Dixon, J. E. 1968 Further Analysis of Near Eastern Obsidian. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 34:319–331.Google Scholar
Renfrew, Colin, Dixon, John E., and Cann, Joseph R. 1966 Obsidian and Early Cultural Contact in the Near East. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 32:30–72.Google Scholar
Santley, Robert S., Barrett, Thomas P., Glascock, Michael D., and Neff, Hector 2001 Pre-Hispanic Obsidian Extraction in the Tuxtla Mountains, Southern Veracruz, Mexico. Ancient Mesoamerica 12:49–63.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael W. 1996 Commodity or Gift: Teotihuacan Obsidian in the Maya Region. Latin American Antiquity 7:21−39.Google Scholar
Stark, Barbara L., Heller, Lynette, Glascock, Michael D., Elam, J. Michael, and Neff, Hector 1992 Obsidian-Artifact Source Analysis for the Mixtequilla Region, South-Central Veracruz, Mexico. Latin American Antiquity 3:221−239.Google Scholar
Stoner, Wesley D., Nichols, Deborah L., Alex, Bridget A., and Crider, Destiny L. 2015 The Emergence of Early-Middle Formative Exchange Patterns in Mesoamerica: A View from Altica in the Teotihuacan Valley. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 39:19–35.Google Scholar
Sugiyama, Saburo 1989 Burials Dedicated to the Old Temple of Quetzalcoatl at Teotihuacan, Mexico. American Antiquity 54:85−106.Google Scholar
Torrence, Robin 1986 Production and Exchange of Stone Tools: Prehistoric Obsidian in the Aegean. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Tripcevich, Nicholas, and Mackay, Alex 2011 Procurement at the Chivay Obsidian Source, Arequipa, Peru. World Archaeology 43 (2):271–297.Google Scholar
Zeitlin, Robert N. 1982 Towards a More Comprehensive Model of Interregional Commodity Distribution: Political Variables and Prehistoric Obsidian Procurement in Mesoamerica. American Antiquity 47:260−275.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Knight supplementary material

Knight supplementary material 1

Download Knight supplementary material(File)
File 65.6 KB