No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Self-Evaluation Is Not a Serious Alternative to an Independent Study of the American Law Institute
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 December 2018
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- “From the Trenches and Towers”
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 1998
References
Alex, Elson. 1998. The Case for an In-Depth Study of the American Law Institute. Law and Social Inquiry
23(3):625–40.Google Scholar
Alex, Elson, and Shakman, Michael L.
1996. The ALI Principles of Corporate Governance: A Tainted Process and Flawed Product
Business Lawyer
49 (Aug.): 1761–92.Google Scholar
Groner, Jonathan. 1996. Insurance Lobby Aims at Normally Staid ALL
Legal Times, 10 June, 1, 4–5.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M.
1998. Evaluating the American Law Institute: Research Issues and Prospects. Law and Social Inquiry
23(3):667–71.Google Scholar
Rotunda, Ronald D.
1998. Gauging the Impact of the Proposed Restatement of the Law Governing Lawyers. Professional Lawyer
9, no. 2 (Feb.): 2, 11–13.Google Scholar
Shapo, Marshall S.
1998. Private Organization, Public Responsibilities. Law and Social Inquiry
23(3):651–55.Google Scholar
Zeppos, Nicholas S.
1998. Reforming a Private Legislature: The Maturation of the American Law Institute as a Legislative Body. Law and Social Inquiry
23(3):657–66.Google Scholar