Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:42:43.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Somedays, I Have Second Thoughts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 December 2018

Hendrik Hartog
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this short response to the reviewers of Someday All This Will Be Yours, A History of Inheritance and Old Age (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012), the author identifies some of the paradoxes and difficulties that researching and writing the book posed and, along the way, qualifies and complicates some of the conclusions that he then drew. In particular, he questions the extent to which a work of history speaks to the concerns of the emerging field of elder law.

Type
Review Essay
Information
Law & Social Inquiry , Volume 40 , Issue 2 , Spring 2015 , pp. 519 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © American Bar Foundation, 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boris, Eileen, and Klein, Jennifer. 2010. Caring for America: How Home Health Workers Became the New Face of Labor. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dayton, Cornelia H., and Salinger, Sharon. 2014. Robert Love's Warnings: Searching for Strangers in Colonial Boston. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dubler, Ariela R. 2013. All Unhappy Families: Tales of Old Age, Rational Actors, and the Disordered Life: How Family Members and Legal Actors Make Sense of the Conflicts of Eldercare. Harvard Law Review 126:2289–2311.Google Scholar
Gordon, Linda. 1988. Heroes of Their Own Lives. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Gratton, Brian. 1993. The Creation of Retirement: Families, Individuals and the Social Security Movement. In Societal Impact on Aging: Historical Perspectives, ed. Schaie, K. Warner and Achenbaum, W. Andrew, 45–73. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Gratton, Brian. 1996. The Poverty of Impoverishment Theory: The Economic Well‐Being of the Elderly, 1890–1950. Journal of Economic History 56 (1): 39–61.Google Scholar
Grigoryeva, Angelina. 2014. When Gender Trumps Everything: The Division of Parent Care Among Siblings. Princeton, NJ: Center for the Study of Social Organization.Google Scholar
Gutierrez, David G. 2007. The Politics of the Interstices: Reflections on Citizenship and Non‐Citizenship at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts 1 (1): 89–120.Google Scholar
Hacking, Ian. 1986. “Making Up People.” In Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, ed. Heller, Thomas C., Sosna, Morton, and Wellbery, David E., 222–37. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Halley, Janet. 2011. What Is Family Law? A Genealogy, Part One. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 23 (1): 1–109.Google Scholar
Hartog, Hendrik. 2013. Two Stories About Two Currencies of Care. Buffalo Law Review 61 (2): 269–91.Google Scholar
Roberts, Dorothy E. 1991. Punishing Drug Addicts Who Have Babies: Women of Color, Equality, and the Right of Privacy. Harvard Law Review 104 (7): 1419–82.Google Scholar
Smith, Peggy R. 2007. Aging and Caring in the Home: Regulating Paid Domesticity in the Twenty‐First Century. Iowa Law Review 92:1835–1900.Google Scholar