Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Scott, Kevin M.
2006.
Reconsidering the Impact of Jurisprudential Regimes*.
Social Science Quarterly,
Vol. 87,
Issue. 2,
p.
380.
Yates, Jeff L.
Brace, Paul
and
Boyea, Brent D.
2006.
Judges, Litigants and the Design of Courts.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Klein, David E.
2006.
The Influence of Jurisprudential Considerations on Supreme Court Decisionmaking: A Study of Conflict Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
135.
Benesh, Sara C.
and
Spaeth, Harold J.
2007.
The Constraint of Law.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 5,
p.
755.
Furgeson, Joshua R.
Babcock, Linda
and
Shane, Peter M.
2008.
Behind the mask of method: Political orientation and constitutional interpretive preferences..
Law and Human Behavior,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 6,
p.
502.
BAILEY, MICHAEL A.
and
MALTZMAN, FORREST
2008.
Does Legal Doctrine Matter? Unpacking Law and Policy Preferences on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 102,
Issue. 3,
p.
369.
Scott, Kevin M.
2008.
Judicial Behavior and the Rehnquist Court's Federalism Revolution.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
85.
BARTELS, BRANDON L.
2009.
The Constraining Capacity of Legal Doctrine on the U.S. Supreme Court.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 103,
Issue. 3,
p.
474.
Dioso-Villa, Rachel
2010.
Where There's Smoke, There's Fire: A Comparative Analysis of Judicial Outcomes and the Legal Rhetoric of Expert Evidence (Doctoral Dissertation).
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Berman, Mitchell N.
2011.
Constitutional Interpretation: Non‐originalism.
Philosophy Compass,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 6,
p.
408.
Brace, Paul
Yates, Jeff
and
Boyea, Brent D.
2012.
Judges, Litigants, and the Design of Courts.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 46,
Issue. 3,
p.
497.
Farber, Daniel A.
2015.
International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.
p.
740.
Evans, Michael C.
Cates, Cynthia L.
and
McIntosh, Wayne V.
2015.
The Reality of Jurisprudence(?): Interpretive Methods in the Opinions of Justices Antonin Scalia and Stephen Breyer.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
20.
Glynn, Adam N.
and
Sen, Maya
2015.
Identifying Judicial Empathy: Does Having Daughters Cause Judges to Rule for Women's Issues?.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 59,
Issue. 1,
p.
37.
Langbroek, Philip
van der Velde, Mandy
and
van der Linden, Tina
2015.
Written Justifications of Judgments of Utrecht District Court: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Case Characteristics and Text Characteristics.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 2,
p.
138.
D'Elia‐Kueper, Justine
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
2015.
Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
p.
1.
Hall, Matthew E.K.
2016.
Judicial Review as a Limit on Government Domination: Reframing, Resolving, and Replacing the (Counter)Majoritarian Difficulty.
Perspectives on Politics,
Vol. 14,
Issue. 2,
p.
391.
Dioso‐Villa, Rachel
2016.
Is the Expert Admissibility Game Fixed?: Judicial Gatekeeping of Fire and Arson Evidence.
Law & Policy,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
54.
Carman, Raymond V.
2017.
Making Good Law or Good Policy?.
p.
11.
Moral, Mert
and
Tokdemir, Efe
2017.
Justices ‘en Garde’: Ideological determinants of the dissolution of anti-establishment parties.
International Political Science Review,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
p.
264.