Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T15:30:30.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Supreme Court and the Protection of Minority Rights: An Empirical Examination of Racial Discrimination Cases

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Francine Sanders Romero
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This inquiry provides a basic assessment of the impact of three potential determinants of racial discrimination cases in the U.S. Supreme Court since 1954. The research design provides two improved methods of explicating this issue. First, the model allows for a comparison of basic Hamiltonian institutionalism (i.e., the bulwark thesis), majoritarianism, and attitudinalism in a single test, as opposed to previous studies that tended to examine only two theoretical approaches at a time. Second, the majoritarian approach is given more careful consideration through the use of theoretical and empirical evidence, which allows the subtleties of public opinion in this area to be assessed. The findings show some support for the basic bulwark prediction over majoritarianism—decisions fail to reflect majority opinion trends. The bulwark thesis fails to receive full support, however, since the ideologies of the Justices also display a significant influence on outcomes.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 34 , Issue 2 , 2000 , pp. 291 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank Middle Tennessee State University for a grant that supported the initial research and the anonymous reviewers for very helpful suggestions.

References

References

Barnum, David G. (1985) “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision Making in the Post-New Deal Period,” 47 J. of Politics 652–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1988) “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court,” 82 American Political Science Rev. 905–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, Lawrence (1997) The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, Linda, & Bennett, Stephen Earl (1990) Living with Leviathan. Lawrence: Univ. Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul, & Hall, Melinda Gann (1995) “Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States,” 48 Political Research Q. 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John & Fiorina, Morris (1987) The Personal Vote. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, Gregory A. (1991) “Courts and Public Opinion,” in Gates, J. B. & Johnson, C. A., eds., The American Courts. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Angus (1971) White Attitudes Toward Black People. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
Casper, Jonathan D. (1976) “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making,” 70 American Political Science Rev. 50–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayton, Cornell W., & Gillman, Howard, eds. (1999) Supreme Court Decision Making. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Commager, Henry Steele (1943) “Judicial Review and Democracy,” 19 Virginia Q. Rev. 417–28.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1957) “Decisionmaking in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker,” 6 J. of Public Law 279–95.Google Scholar
Davis, Abraham L., & Graham, Barbara Luck (1995) The Supreme Court, Race, and Civil Rights. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edsall, Thomas Byrne, with Edsall, Mary D. (1992) Chain Reaction. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
Epstein, Lee, & Mershon, Carol (1996) “Measuring Political Preferences,” 40 American J. of Political Science 261–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, & Knight, Jack (1998) The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. (1991) “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game,” 79 California Law Rev. 613–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Roy B., & Wood, B. Dan (1997) “The Public and the Supreme Court: Individual Justice Responsiveness to American Policy Moods,” 41 American J. of Political Science 468–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Tracey E., & Epstein, Lee (1992) “On the Nature of Supreme Court Decision Making,” 86 American Political Science Rev. 323–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, Alexander, Madison, James & Jay, John (1961) The Federalist Papers. New York: NAL Penguin, Inc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketcham, Ralph, ed. (1986) The Anti-Federalist Papers and the Constitutional Convention Debates. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., & Sears, David O. (1981) “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism Versus Racial Threats to the Good Life,” 40 J. of Personality & Social Psychology 414–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinder, Donald R., & Sanders, Lynn M. (1996) Divided by Color. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack, & Epstein, Lee (1996) “The Norm of Stare Decisis,” 40 American J. of Political Science 1018–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuran, Timur (1996) “Seeds of Racial Explosion,” in Winters, P. A., ed., Race Relations. San Diego: Greenhaven Press.Google Scholar
Link, Michael W. (1995) “Tracking Public Mood in the Supreme Court: Cross-Time Analyses of Criminal Procedure and Civil Rights Cases,” 48 Political Research Q. 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, Spriggs, James F. II & Wahlbeck, Paul J. (1999) “Strategy and Judicial Choice: New Institutionalist Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-Making,” in Clayton, C. W. & Gillman, H., eds., Supreme Court Decision-Making. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Marks, Brian A. (1988) A Model of Judicial Influence on Congressional Policymaking: Grove City College v. Bell. Working Papers in Political Science, P-88-7, the Hoover Institution, Stanford Univ., Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
Marshall, Thomas (1989) Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Wayne V. (1991) “Courts and Socioeconomic Change,” in Gates, J. B. & Johnson, C. A., eds., The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Mishler, William, & Sheehan, Reginald S. (1993) “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions,” 87 American Political Science Rev. 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, & Segal, Jeffrey A. (1994) “Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions, 88 American Political Science Rev. 711–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Railton, Peter (1983) “Judicial Review, Elites and Liberal Democracy,” in Pennock, R. & Chapman, J., eds., Liberal Democracy. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Rakove, Jack N. (1996) Original Meanings. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald (1991) The Hollow Hope. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rostow, Eugene (1952) “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review,” 66 Harvard Law Rev. 193–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schubert, Glendon (1965) The Judicial Mind: The Attitudes and Ideologies of Supreme Court Justices, 1946–1963. Evanston, IL: Northwestern Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Howard, Steeh, Charlotte & Bobo, Lawrence (1985) Racial Attitudes in America. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Hensler, Carl P. & Speer, Leslie K. (1979) “Whites' Opposition to Busing: Self-Interest or Symbolic Politics?” 73 American Political Science Rev. 369–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, Richard R., Tyler, Tom R. & Allen, Harris M. Jr. (1980) “Self-Interest Versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting,” 74 American Political Science Rev. 670–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A. (1997) “Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts,” 91 American Political Science Rev. 28–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Cover, Albert (1989) “Ideological Values and Votes of Supreme Court Justices,” 83 American Political Science Rev. 557–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., & Spaeth, Harold J. (1993) The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Segal, Jeffrey A., Epstein, Lee, Cameron, Charles M. & Spaeth, Harold J. (1995) “Ideological Values and the Votes of Supreme Court Justices Revisited,” 57 J of Politics 812–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sniderman, Paul M., & Piazza, Thomas (1993) The Scar of Race. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spann, Girardeau A. (1993) Race Against the Court. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A. (1999) Public Opinion in America. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Stimson, James A., Makuen, Michael & Erikson, Robert S. (1995) “Dynamic Representation,” 89 American Political Science Rev. 543–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuch, Steven A., & Hughes, Michael (1996) “Whites' Racial Policy Attitudes,” 77 Social Science Q. 723–45.Google Scholar
Wasby, Stephen L., D'Amato, Anthony & Metrailer, Rosemary (1977) Desegregation from Brown to Alexander. Carbondale: Southern Illinois Univ. Press.Google Scholar
West, Cornel (1993) Keeping Faith. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Woodward, C. Vann (1974) The Strange Career of Jim Crow. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).Google Scholar
Griggs v. Duke Power Co., 401 U.S. 424 (1971).Google Scholar
(See also Appendix.)..Google Scholar