Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T17:34:59.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Content, Method, and Epistemology of Gender in Sociolegal Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Carrie Menkel-Meadow  and
Shari Seidman Diamond
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , 1991 , pp. 221 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 by The Law and Society Association

References

References

AMIN, Samir (1989) Eurocentrism. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
ANDERSEN, Margaret L. (1988) Thinking About Women: Sociological Perspectives on Sex and Gender. 2d ed. New York: Macmillian Publishing Co.Google Scholar
BARLETT, Katherine (1990) “Feminist Legal Methods,” 103 Harvard Law Review 829.Google Scholar
BELENKY, Mary Field, CLINCHY, Blythe McVicker, GOLD-BERGER, Nancy Rule, and Jill Mattuck, TARULE (1986) Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice and Mind. New York. Basic Books.Google Scholar
BERGER, Peter L., and Thomas, LUCKMANN (1966) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
BINION, Gayle, (1991) “On Women, Marriage, Family and the Traditions of Political Thought,” 25 Law & Society Review 461.Google Scholar
BLEIER, Ruth (1984) Science and Gender: A Critique of Biology and Its Theories on Women. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
BLEIER, Ruth (ed.) (1988) Feminist Approaches to Science. New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
BROWN, Barbara A., EMERSON, Thomas I., FALK, Gail, and Ann E., FREEDMAN (1971) “The Equal Rights Amendment: A Constitutional Basis for Equal Rights for Women,” 80 Yale Law Journal 871.Google Scholar
COLLIER, Jane, and Sylvia, YANAGISAKO (1987) Gender and Kinship. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
COLLINS, Patricia Hill (1990) Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
COOK, Judith A., and Mary Margaret, FONOW (1990) “Knowledge and Women's Interests: Issue of Epistemology in Feminist Sociological Research,” in Neilsen, J. M. (ed.), Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
BEAUVIOR, Simone de (1949) The Second Sex. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
DUBOIS, Ellen (1978) Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America 1848–1869. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
EICHLER, Margrit (1988) Nonsexist Research Methods. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
EISENSTEIN, Hester, and Alice, JARDINE (eds.) (1985) The Future of Difference. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
EISENSTEIN, Zillah (1988) The Female Body and the Law. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
EPSTEIN, Cynthia Fuchs (1988) Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender and the Social Order. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
FAUSTO-STERLING, Anne (1985) Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
FLAX, Jane (1989) Thinking Fragments: Psychoanalysis, Feminism and Postmodernism in the Contemporary West. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
FORD, David A. (1991) “Prosecution as a Victim Power Resource: A Note on Empowering Women in Violent Conjugal Relationships,” 25 Law & Society Review 313.Google Scholar
FREEDMAN, Estelle (1990) “Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference: An Overview,” in Rhode, D. (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence (1986) “The Law and Society Movement,” 38 Stanford Law Review 763.Google Scholar
GAGNIER, Regina (1990) “Feminist Post-Modernism: The End of Feminism or the Ends of Theory,” in Rhode, D. (ed.), Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
GARTNER, Rosemary, and McCARTHY, Bill (1991) “The Social Distribution of Femicide in Urban Canada, 1921–1988,” 25 Law & Society Review 287.Google Scholar
GATES, Henry Louis Jr. (ed.) (1986) “Race,” Writing and Difference. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
GILLIGAN, Carol (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
GOODMAN, Jane, LOFTUS, Elizabeth F., LEE, Marian, and Edith, GREENE (1991) “Money, Sex, and Death: Gender Bias in Wrongful Death Damage Awards,” 25 Law & Society Review 263.Google Scholar
GORDON, Linda (1988) Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence: Boston 1880–1960. New York: Viking Books.Google Scholar
HAGAN, John, ZATZ, Marjorie, ARNOLD, Bruce, and Fiona, KAY (1991) “Cultural Capital, Gender and the Structural Transformation of Legal Practice,” 25 Law & Society Review 239.Google Scholar
HARAWAY, Donna (1989) Primate Visions: Gender, Race and Nature in the World of Modern Science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
HARDING, Sandra (1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
HARDING, Sandra (ed.) (1987) Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
HARDING, Sandra (1991) Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
HAWKSWORTH, Mary (1989) “Knowers, Knowing, Known: Feminist Theory and Claims of Truth,” 14 Signs 533.Google Scholar
HENDERSON, Lynne (1991) “Law's Patriarchy,” 25 Law & Society Review 411.Google Scholar
HIRSH, Marianne, and Evelyn Fox, KELLER (eds.) (1990) Conflicts in Feminism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
HOOKS, bell (1981) Ain't I A Woman? Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Alex M. Jr. (1991) “The New Voice of Color,” 100 Yale Law Journal 2007.Google Scholar
JOHNSON, Miriam M. (1988) Strong Mothers, Weak Wives. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
KANDAL, Terry (1988) The Women Question in Classical Sociological Theory. Gainesville: University Presses of Florida.Google Scholar
KELLER, Evelyn Fox (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
KENNEDY, Randall (1989) “Racial Critiques of Legal Academia,” 102 Harvard Law Review 1745 (1989).Google Scholar
KESSLER, Suzanne, and McKENNA, Wendy (1978) Gender: An Ethnomethodological Approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
KUSHNER, Howard (1990) “Women and Suicide in Historical Perspective,” in Nielsen, J. M. (ed.), Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
LEVINE, Felice (1990) “Goose Bumps and ‘the Search for Signs of Intelligent Life’ in Sociolegal Studies: After Twenty Five Years,” 24 Law & Society Review 7.Google Scholar
LITTLETON, Christine (1987) “Reconstructing Sexual Equality,” 75 California Law Review 1067.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1984) “Law and the Behavioral Sciences: Is There Any There There?” 6 Law and Policy Quarterly 149.Google Scholar
MACCOBY, Eleanor Emmons, and Carol Nagy, JACKLIN (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
MacKINNON, Catharine A. (1987) Feminisim Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKINNON, Catharine A. (1989) Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MARKS, Elaine, and Isabelle de, COURTIVRON (1981) New French Feminisms. New York: Schocken Books.Google Scholar
MENKEL-MEADOW, Carrie (1987) “Excluded Voices: New Voices in the Legal Profession Making New Voices in the Law,” 42 University of Miami Law Review 29.Google Scholar
MENKEL-MEADOW, Carrie (1990) “Durkheimian Epiphanies: The Importance of Engaged Social Science in Legal Studies,” 18 Florida State Law Review 91.Google Scholar
MILKMAN, Ruth (1986) “Women's History and the Sears Case,” 12 Feminist Studies 375.Google Scholar
MILLER, Susan L., and Sally S., SIMPSON (1991) “Courtship Violence and Social Control: Does Gender Matter?” 25 Law & Society Review 335.Google Scholar
MOI, Toril (1986) Sexual/Textual Politics. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
MOORE, Thomas J. (1989) “The Cholesterol Myth,” Atlantic Monthly, September, 37.Google Scholar
MORANTZ-SANCHEZ, Regina (1985) Sympathy and Science: Women Physicians in American Medicine. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MORELLO, Karen Berger (1986) The Invisible Bar: The Women Lawyer in America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
NIELSEN, Joyce McCarl (ed.) (1990) Feminist Research Methods: Exemplary Readings in the Social Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
OKIN, Susan Moller (1989) Justice, Gender and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
OLSEN, Frances (1983) “The Family and the Market: A Study in Ideology and Legal Reform,” 96 Harvard Law Review 1497.Google Scholar
PATEMAN, Carole (1988) The Sexual Contract. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
PEPLAU, Leticia Anne, and Eve, CONRAD (1989) “Beyond Non-sexist Research: The Perils of Feminist Methods in Psychology,” 13 Psychology of Women Quarterly 379.Google Scholar
RAPAPORT, Elizabeth (1991) “The Death Penalty and Gender Discrimination,” 25 Law & Society Review 367.Google Scholar
RHODE, Deborah L. (ed.) (1990) Theoretical Perspectives on Sexual Difference. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
ROLLINS, Judith (1985) Between Women: Domestics and Their Employers. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
ROSALDO, Michelle Z., and Louise, LAMPHERE (eds.) (1974) Women, Culture and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
ROSENBERG, Rosalind (1982) Beyond Separate Spheres: Intellectual Roots of Modern Feminism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
SAID, Edward (1978) Orientalism. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
SANDAY, Peggy (1990) Fraternity Gang Rape: Sex, Brotherhood, and Privilege on Campus. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
SCHIEBINGER, Londa (1989) The Mind Has No Sex? Women in the Origins of Modern Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
SCHULTZ, Vicki (1990) “Telling Stories About Women and Work: Judicial Interpretations of Sex Segregation in the Workplace in Title VII Cases Raising the Lack of Interest Argument,” 103 Harvard Law Review 1750.Google Scholar
SCOTT, Joan (1988) “Deconstructing Equality-Versus-Difference: Or, The Uses of Poststructuralist Theory for Feminism,” 14 Feminist Studies 33.Google Scholar
SMART, Carol (1989) Feminism and the Power of Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
SMITH, Dorothy (1987) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
STACEY, Judith (1989) “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” 11 Women's Studies International Forum 21.Google Scholar
STACEY, Judith, and Barrie, THORNE (1985) “The Missing Feminist Revolution in Sociology,” 32 Social Problems 301.Google Scholar
VILLMOARE, Adelaide (1991) “Women, Differences, and Rights as Practices: An Interpretive Essay and a Proposal,” 25 Law & Society Review 385.Google Scholar
WESTKOTT, Marcia (1990) “Feminist Criticism of the Social Sciences,” in Nielsen, J. M. (ed.), Feminist Research Methods. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, Joan (1989) “Deconstructing Gender,” 87 Michigan Law Review 797.Google Scholar
WILLIAMS, Wendy (1982) “The Equality Crisis: Some Reflections on Culture, Courts and Feminism,” 7 Women's Rights Law Reporter 175.Google Scholar
WISHIK, Heather (1985) “To Question Everything: An Inquiry into Feminist Jurisprudence,” 1 Berkeley Women's Law Journal 64.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Bradwell v. Illinois, 16 Wall. 130 (1873).Google Scholar
California Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Guerra, 479 U.S. 272 (1987).Google Scholar
EEOC v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 581 F.2d. 941 (D.C. Cir. 1987).Google Scholar