Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-lvtdw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-18T14:28:40.978Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Disability, Rights, and the Construction of Sexuality in Tort Claims

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Abstract

This study empirically investigates how courts define sexuality of disabled persons in the absence of a formal right to sexuality. The focus of the study is tort law, a field ungoverned by direct disability rights legislation, assuming that tort law is the law of disablement as it concerns the transformative process of becoming disabled. The study investigates the types of damages courts have awarded for harm to sexual functioning, inquiring to whom and under what conditions have they been awarded. Additionally, it examines the discourse that characterizes each type of damages, and the legal, social, medical, and healthcare policy developments that have affected courts' rhetoric and reasoning. Our findings reveal shifting trends in scale, content, and inclusiveness of beneficiaries in terms of gender and age. Over time, courts have adopted a more hopeful and dynamic approach to disabled persons' sexuality while remaining within an individual-medical framework. We suggest that these shifting trends can be linked to the slow diffusion of the social-affirmative approach to disability, the limits of tort law as a field, and the role of healthcare policy in shaping the landscape of tort claims.

Type
Special Issue: Disability Legal Studies Articles
Copyright
© 2019 Law and Society Association.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was supported by the Israeli Science Foundation (ISF), grant no. 719/16. We are grateful to Orna Rabinovich-Einy, Katharina Heyer, Avital Mentovich, Tamar Kricheli-Katz, Ariel Porat, Yair Sagy, Doron Dorfman, Roni Holler, and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions to previous versions of the text. We are particularly thankful to Susan Sterett, LSR Editor, for her close guidance and invaluable support.

Both authors contributed equally to this manuscript.

References

References

Able, Richard L. (1989) “A Critique of Torts,” 37 USLA Law Rev. 785831.Google Scholar
Alberstein, Michal (2018) “Judicial Conflict Resolution: Towards a Jurisprudence beyond Dispute,” 11 Din Udvarim 1776 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Bagenstos, Samuel R. (2009) Law and the Contradictions of the Disability Rights Movement. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenstos, Samuel. R. & Schlanger, Margo (2007) “Hedonic Damages, Hedonic Adaptations, and Disability,” 60 Vanderbilt Law Rev. 697745.Google Scholar
Bell, David & Binnie, Jon (2000) The Sexual Citizen: Queer Politics and Beyond. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bender, Leslie (1993) “Overview of Feminist Torts Scholarship,” 78 Cornell Law Rev. 575–96.Google Scholar
Bitton, Yifat (2003) “Feminine Life-Experience and the Foreseeability of Harm,” 33 Hebrew Univ. Law Rev. 585654 [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Bloom, Anne (2010) “To be Real: Sexual Identity Politics in Tort Litigation,” 88 North Caroline Law Rev. 358425.Google Scholar
Bloom, Anne & Miller, Paul Steven (2011) “Blindsight: How We See Disabilities in Tort Litigation,” 86 Washington Law Rev. 709–53.Google Scholar
Boni-Saenz, Alexander (2015) “Sexuality and Incapacity,” 76 Ohio State Law J. 1201–53.Google Scholar
Carlile, Alisha M. (2005) “Like Family: Rights of Nonmarried Cohabitational Partners in Loss of Consortium Actions,” 46 Boston College Law Rev. 392421.Google Scholar
Chamallas, Martha & Wriggins, Jennifer B. (2010) The Measure of Injury: Race, Gender, and Tort Law. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Corrêa, Sonia, Petchesky, Rosalind, & Parker, Richard, eds. (2008) Sexuality, Health and Human Rights. London, New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, Dianne (2005) “Regulating Intimacy—Judicial Discourse in Cases of Wife Assault (1970 to 2000),” 11 Violence Against Women 197226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, Lennard J. (1995) Enforcing Normalcy: Disability, Deafness, and the Body. London, New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Doron, Israel, Spanier, Benny, & Mantovani, Eugenio (2018) “Ageism, Human Rights, and the European Court of Human Rights: A Critical Analysis of the Carvalho v. Portugal Case (2017),” 11 DePaul J. for Social Justice Art. 2.Google Scholar
Drum, C. E. (2009) “Models and Approaches to Disability,” in Drum, C. E., Krahn, G. L., & Bersani, H., eds., Disability and Public Health. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association & American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emens, Elizabeth F. (2009) “Intimate Discrimination: The State's Role in the Accidents of Sex and Love,” 122 Harvard Law Rev. 1307–402.Google Scholar
Erikson, Erik H. (1975) Childhood and Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1978) The History of Sexuality. Volume I: An Introduction. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Franke, Katherine (2001) “Theorizing Yes: An Essay on Feminism, Law and Desire,” 101 Columbia Law Rev. 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freckelton, Ian S. C. (2013) “Sexual Surrogate Partner Therapy: Legal and Ethical Issues, Psychiatry,” 20 Psychology and Law 643–59.Google Scholar
Gacheru, Margareta Wa (1998) “‘Potency pill’ Viagra Kicks off a Sexual RevolutionDaily Nation, May 24, 1998.Google Scholar
Gal, John (2004) Social Security in Israel. Jerusalem: Magnes. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (2004) “The Vanishing Trial: An Examination of Trials and Related Matters in Federal and State Courts,” 1 J. of Empirical Legal Studies 459570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garton, Stephen (2004) Histories of Sexuality Antiquity to Sexual Revolution. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Goodley, Dan (2010) Disability Studies: An Interdisciplinary Introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hall, Mark A. & Wright, Ronald F. (2008) “Systematic Content Analysis of Judicial Pinions,” 96 California Law Rev. 63122.Google Scholar
Hensel, Wendy. F. (2005) “The Disabling Impact of Wrongful Birth and Wrongful Life Actions,” 40 Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Rev. 141–95.Google Scholar
Heyer, Katharina (2015a) Rights Enabled: The Disability Revolution, from the US, to Germany and Japan, to the United Nations. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heyer, Katharina (2015b) “Law and Disability,” in Sarat, Austin & Ewick, Patricia, eds., Handbook of Law and Society. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hitt, Jack (2000) “The Second Sexual Revolution,” New York Times, Feb. 20, 2000Google Scholar
Ireland, Thomas R. (2012) “Trends in Legal Decisions Involving Hedonic Damages from 200 to 2012,” 19 J. of Legal Economics 6188.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila (2008) “Disability and the Male Sex Right,” 31 Women's Studies International 327–35.Google Scholar
Kanter, Arlene S. (2011) “The Law: What's Disability Studies Got to Do with It or an Introduction to Disability Legal Studies,” 42 Columbia Human Rights Law Rev. 403–79.Google Scholar
Karako-Eyal, Nili & Vered, Ron (2001) “Global Compensation for Medical Expenses,” 12 HaMishpat 7682.Google Scholar
Keren-Paz, Tsach (2013) Torts, Egalitarianism and Distributive Justice. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Linton, Simi (1998) Claiming Disability: Knowledge and Identity. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Loe, Meika (2004) The Rise of Viagra: How the Little Blue Pill Changed Sex in America. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Lombardo, Paul A. (2008) “Disability, Eugenics, and the Culture Wars,” 2 Saint Louis Univ. J. of Health Law & Policy 5780.Google Scholar
Lyden, Martin (2007) “Assessment of Sexual Consent Capacity,” 25 Sexuality and Disability 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Barbara L. (2002) “‘Hard Science’: Gendered Constructions of Sexual Dysfunction in the Viagra Age,” 5 Sexualities 131–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mather, Lynn (1998) “Theorizing about Trial Courts: Lawyers, Policymaking, and—Tobacco Litigation,” 23 Law and Social Inquiry 897940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McRuer, Robert (2011) “Disabling Sex: Notes for a Crip Theory of Sexuality,” 17 GLQ 107–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, Adam A. (1998) “Living the World: A New Look at the Disabled in the Law of Torts,” 48 Catholic Univ. Law Rev. 323417.Google Scholar
Miller, Alice M. (1999) “Human Rights and Sexuality: First Steps toward Articulating A Rights Framework for Claims to Sexuality Rights and Freedoms,” 93 Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law) 288303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mona, Linda R., Syme, Maggie L., & Cameron, Rebecca P. (2014) “Sexuality and Disability: A Disability-Affirmative Approach to Sex Therapy,” in Binik, Yitzchak M. & Hall, Kathryn S. K., eds., Principles and Practice of Sex Therapy. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Mor, Sagit (2006) “Between Charity, Welfare, and Warfare: A Disability Legal Studies Analysis of Privilege and Neglect in Israeli Disability Policy,” 18 Yale J. of Law and the Humanities 63137.Google Scholar
Mor, Sagit (2009) “Disability Rights in Israel: Between Socio-Political Conceptualization and Legal Recognition,” in Gal, J. & Ajzenstadt, M., eds., Access to Justice and Social Rights Jerusalem. Taub Center for Social Policy Studies in Israel. [Hebrew].Google Scholar
Mor, Sagit (2018) “The Meaning of Injury: A Disability Perspective,” in Bloom, Anne, Engel, David, & McCann, Michael, eds., Injury and Injustice: The Cultural Politics of Harm and Redress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nielsen, Laura Beth (2010) “The Need for Multi-Method Approaches in Empirical Legal Research,” in Cane, Peter & Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, Michael J. (1990) The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlin, Michael L. & Lynch, Alison J. (2016) Sexuality, Disability and the Law: Beyond the Last Frontier? New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perlman, Michael A. (2001) “The Impact of the New Sexual Pharmaceuticals on Sex Therapy,” 3 Current Psychiatry Reports 195201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, Ronen (2007) “It's a Wonderful Life,” 93 Cornell Law Rev. 329400.Google ScholarPubMed
Pollard, Sacks, Deana (2008) “Intentional Sex Torts,” 77 Fordham Law Rev. 1052–94.Google Scholar
Potts, Annie, Gavey, Nicola, Grace, Victoria M., & Vares, Tiina (2003) “The Downside of Viagra: Women's Experiences and Concerns,” 25 Sociology of Health & Illness 697719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richardson, Diane (2000) Rethinking Sexuality. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rimmerman, Arie, Soffer, Michal, David, Dana, Dagan, Tsilly, Rothler, Roni, & Mishaly, Lior (2015) “Mapping the Terrain of Disability Legislation: The Case of Israel,” 30 Disability & Society 4658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rivlin, Eiezer (2012) “Israel as a Mixed Jurisdiction,” 57 McGill Law J. 781–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rollins, Joe (2002) “AIDS, Law, and the Rhetoric of Sexuality,” 36 Law & Society Rev. 161–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, Bruce Waitzberg, Ruth, and Merkur, Sherry (2015) “Israel: Health System Review.” 17:6 Health Systems in Transition. World Health Organization, Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, Talli, Aloni, Ronit, & Heruti, Rafi (2014) “Surrogate Partner Therapy: Ethical Considerations in Sexual Medicine,” 11 J. of Sexual Medicine 321–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, Gayle (1984) “Thinking Sex: Notes for a Radical Theory of the Politics of Sexuality,” in Vans, C., ed., Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. Boston, London, Melbourne & Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Sanders, Teela (2007) “The Politics of Sexual Citizenship: Commercial Sex and Disability,” 22 Disability & Society 439–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaaf, Marta (2011) “Negotiating Sexuality in the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” 8 SUR International J. on Human Rights 113–32.Google Scholar
Seidman, Steven (2001) “From Identity to Queer Politics: Shifts in Normative Heterosexuality and the Meaning of Citizenship,” 5 Citizenship Studies 321–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom (2000) “Disabled Sexuality: Toward Rights and Recognition,” 18 Sexuality and Disability 159–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom (2006) Disability Rights and Wrongs. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom, Gillespie-Sells, Kathy, & Davies, Dominic (1996) The Sexual Politics of Disability: Untold Desires. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, Tom & Richardson, Sarah (2018) “The Sexual Politics of Disability, Twenty Years On,” 20 Scandinavian J. of Disability Research 8291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheehy, Gail (1996) New Passages: Mapping your Life across Time. Collins.Google Scholar
Shildrick, Margrit (2007) “Contested Pleasures: The Sociopolitical Economy of Disability and Sexuality,” 4 Sexuality Research and Social Policy 5366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shuttleworth, Russell P. & Mona, Linda (2002) “Disability and Sexuality: Toward a Focus on Sexual Access: Introduction to the Symposium,” 22 Disability Studies Q. 29.Google Scholar
Silbey, Susan S. (1981) “Making Sense of the Lower Courts,” 6 Justice System J. 1327.Google Scholar
Silvers, Anita (1998) Disability, Difference, Discrimination: Perspectives on Justice in Bioethics and Public Policy. Lanham: Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Stein, Michael M. & Stein, P. J. (2007) “Beyond Disability Civil Rights,” 58 Hastings Law J. 1203–40.Google Scholar
Swaine, John & French, Sally (2000) “Towards an Affirmation Model of Disability,” 15 Disability & Society 569–82.Google Scholar
Sylvest, Flynn (2004) “New Tort Rules for Unmarried Partners: The Enhanced Potential for Successful Loss of Consortium and NIED Claims by Same Sex Partners in New Mexico after Lozoya,” 34 New Mexico Law Rev. 461–87.Google Scholar
TenBroek, Jacobus (1996) “The Right to Live in the World: The Disabled in the World of Torts,” 54 California Law Rev. 841919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tepper, Mitchell S. (2000) “Sexuality and Disability: The Missing Discourse of Pleasure,” 18 Sexuality and Disability 283–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The United Nations (2006) “Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities,” 2515 Treaty Series.Google Scholar
The World Health Organization (2002) Defining Sexual Health—Report of a Technical Consultation on Sexual Health. Geneva: World Health Document Series.Google Scholar
Vanhala, Lisa (2011) Making Rights a Reality? Disability Rights Activists and Legal Mobilization. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vogler, Stefan (2016) “Legally Queer: The Construction of Sexuality in LGBQ Asylum Claims,” 50 Law & Society Rev. 856–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Mark C. (2012) “A Common Law of Disability Discrimination,” 2012 Utah Law Rev. 429–72.Google Scholar
Webley, Lisa (2010) “Qualitative Approaches to Empirical Legal Research,” in Cane, Peter & Kritzer, Herbert, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, Jeffrey (2007) The World We Have Won. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitzer, Ronald (2010) “The Movement to Criminalize Sex Work in the United States,” 37 J. of Law & Society 6184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youcht, Adi (2019) “The Plasticity of the Body, the Injury, and the Claim: Personal Injury Claims in the Era of Plastic Surgeries,” 25 William & Mary J. of Race, Gender, and Social Justice 353404.Google Scholar
Ziv, Neta (1998) “Disability Law in Israel and the United States—A Comparative Perspective,” 28 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights 171202.Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

Equal Rights for Persons with Disability Law, 5758-1998 (Isr.).Google Scholar
National Health Insurance Law, 5755-1995 (Isr.).Google Scholar
Penal Code, 5737-1977 [Amendment No. 132] 2018 (effective 2020) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Road Accidents Victims Compensation Law, 5735-1975 (Isr.).Google Scholar
The Economic Efficiency Law (Legislative Amendments to Implement the Economic Plan) For the years 2009 and 2010, 5769-2009 (Isr.).Google Scholar
Torts Ordinance [New Version], 5728-1968 (Isr.).Google Scholar

Cases Cited

A.K. v. The Pool, CC (HI) 121/05 (2014) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Abu Ahmad v. Migdal Insurance, CC (JER) 141/95 (1998) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Agbaria. v. Zamir Construction, CC (HI) 252/01 (2004) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Aikin v. The Israeli Phoenix Insurance Company, CC (HI) 679/98 (2006) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Avitan v. Cllalit Medical Services, CC (JER) 6359/04 (2007).Google Scholar
Chibotaro v. Sahar Israeli Insurance Company, CC (TA) 78/94 PM 289(2) (2002) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Dahari v. Nevaro, CC (TA) 569/96 (2004) (Isr.).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericson v. Kibbutz Zikim, CC (TA) 1362/96 (2002) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Fanon v. State of Israel, CC (JER) 82/94 (1996) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Furman v. The Pool, CC)HI) 1845/94 (2000) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Gorodtzky v. Elite Insurance Company, CC (HI) 1548-98 (2008) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Ken-dror v. Cllal Insurance, CC (TA) 754/93 (1999) (Isr.).Google Scholar
M.T. v. Abu Midgam, CC (CT) 217-02-08 (2015) (Isr.).Google Scholar
M.T. v. HaMagen Insurance, CC (Jer) 7470-05 (2010) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Mimony v. City of Jerusalem, CC (JER) 1433/96 (2005) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Mizrahi v. Arie, CC (HI) 709/93 (1999) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Pedro v. Migdal Insurance Company, CA 11152/04, 310(3) PD 61 (2006) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Ploni v. City of Jerusalem, CC (JER) 3198/01 (2008) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Ploni v. Migdal Insurance Company, CC (TA) 1553/99 (2004) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Shachar v. Cllalit Medical Services, CC (TA) 1273/00 (2009) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Shamir v. Orenbuch, CC (JER) 7233-05 (2009) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Sharon v. Mizrahi, CC (HI) 1269/93 (2002) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Shay v. Lod Cigarettes, LTD, CC (TA) 2686/00 (2005) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Shirav v. Ararat Insurance, CC (HI) 514/93 (1999) (Isr.).Google Scholar
Socher v. Wolfson Medical Center, CC (TA) 1975/02 (2008) (Isr.).Google Scholar