Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:28:16.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Exploring the Costs of Administrative Legalization: City Expenditures on Legal Services, 1960-1995

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The institutional environment in both the private and public sector, according to a wide range of observers, is increasingly “legalized”: decisionmaking processes and substantive policies are increasingly subject to legal rules and procedural requirements that are enforceable in court. Although there is little dispute that legal liability has expanded in this way, there is great dispute about the effect of these changes, particularly their costs, on public organizations in practice. Some observers argue that legalization has imposed heavy costs, especially financial costs, on organizations; others, for a variety of reasons, argue that these costs are likely to be exaggerated. In this article I suggest that organizational expenditures on legal services are likely to be a valid indicator of certain important elements of the costs of administrative legalization. I present the results of a study of the legal services expenditures of 13 major U.S. cities over a 35-year period. The results indicate that legal services expenditures indeed have increased in many cities, although not as much as some commentators have speculated. Furthermore, there are significant variations in expenditure patterns among the cities, and a number experienced no long-term growth trend in legal services expenditures.

Type
Research on Legal Services
Copyright
Copyright © 2000 by the Law and Society Association

Footnotes

The author wishes to thank the General Research Fund of the University of Kansas for financial support, and Christine Harrington and the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

References

Abzug, Rikki, & Mezias, Stephen J. (1993) “The Fragmented State and Due Process Protections in Organizations: The Case of Comparable Worth,” 4 Organization Science 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crotty, Paul A. (1996) “Tort Reform: Shutting Off the Money Faucet,” 2 City Law 125–29.Google Scholar
Curran, Barbara A., & Carson, Clara N. (1994) The Lawyer Statistical Report: The U.S. Legal Profession in the 1990s. Chicago: American Bar Foundation.Google Scholar
Davis, Kenneth Culp (1969) Discretionary Justice: A Preliminary Inquiry. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Diver, Colin S. (1981) “Policymaking Paradigms in Administrative Law,” 95 Harvard Law Rev. 393434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncombe, William D., & Straussman, Jeffrey D. (1994) “Judicial Intervention and Local Spending: The Case of Local Jails,” 22 Policy Studies J. 604–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1990) “Legal Environments and Organizational Governance: The Expansion of Due Process in the American Workplace,” 95 American J. of Sociology 1401–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. (1992) “Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law,” 97 American J. of Sociology 1531–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B., Erlanger, Howard S., & Lande, John (1993) “Internal Dispute Resolution: The Transformation of Civil Rights in the Workplace,” 27 Law & Society Rev. 497534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore, & Schwab, Stewart (1987) “The Reality of Constitutional Tort Litigation,” 72 Cornell Law Rev. 641–95.Google Scholar
Eisner, Marc Allen (1993) Regulatory Politics in Transition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998a) “Litigation Stories: Official Perceptions of Lawsuits against Local Governments.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Aspen, CO (4-7 June).Google Scholar
Epp, Charles R. (1998b) “Regulating the ‘Litigious Society‘? The Effects of Liability Laws on City Legal Expenditures.” Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA (3-6 Sept.).Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia, & Silbey, Susan S. (1998) The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Lawrence M. (1985) Total Justice: What Americans Want from the Legal System and Why. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (1980-81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming...,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1983) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) about Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 UCLA Law Rev. 471.Google Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1992) “Law Abounding: Legalisation Around the North Atlantic,” 55 Modern Law Rev. 124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galanter, Marc (1998) “An Oil Strike in Hell: Contemporary Legends about the Civil Justice System,” 40 Arizona Law Rev. 717–52.Google Scholar
Gellis, Ann Judith (1990) “Legislative Reforms of Governmental Tort Liability: Overreacting to Minimal Evidence,” 21 Rutgers Law J. 375417.Google Scholar
William, Haltom, & McCann, Michael W. (1998) “Law and Lore: Media, Common Knowledge, and the Politics of Civil Justice.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA (3-6 Sept.).Google Scholar
William, Haltom, & McCann, Michael W. (1999) “Law and Lore: Urgan Legends and the Politics of Tort Reform.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Law & Society Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Harvard Medical Malpractice Study (1990) Patients, Doctors, and Lawyers: Medical Injury, Malpractice Litigation, and Patient Compensation in New York. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Hensler, Deborah L. (1991) Compensation for Accidental Injuries in the United States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Institute for Civil Justice.Google Scholar
Howard, Philip K. (1994) The Death of Common Sense: How Law Is Suffocating America. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Jaegal, Don, & Cayer, N. Joseph (1991) “Public Personnel Administration by Lawsuit: The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions on Public Employee Litigiousness,” 51 Public Administration Rev. 211–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (1991) “Adversarial Legalism and American Government,” 10 J. of Policy Analysis and Management 369406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert A., & Axelrad, Lee (1997) “Adversarial Legalism: An International Perspective,” in Nivola, P. S., ed., Comparative Disadvantages? Social Regulations and the Global Economy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Kerwin, Cornelius M. (1994) Rulemaking: How Government Agencies Write Law and Make Policy. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Kritzer, Herbert M. (1998) Legal Advocacy: Lawyers and Nonlawyers at Work. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, Yong S. (1987) “Civil Liability of State and Local Governments: Myth and Reality,” 47 Public Administration Rev. 160–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacManus, Susan A. (1993) “The Impact of Litigation on Municipalities: Total Cost, Driving Factors, and Cost Containment Mechanisms,” 44 Syracuse Law Rev. 833–60.Google Scholar
MacManus, Susan A. (1997) “Litigation Costs, Budget Impacts, and Cost Containment Strategies: Evidence from California Cities,” Public Budgeting and Finance, winter:28–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacManus, Susan, & Turner, Patricia A. (1993) “Litigation as a Budgetary Constraint: Problem Areas and Costs,” 53 Public Administration Rev. 462–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahtesian, Charles (1997) “The Endless Court Order,” Governing April:40–43.Google Scholar
May, Marlynn L., & Stengel, Daniel B. (1990) “Who Sues Their Doctors? How Patients Handle Medical Grievances,” 24 Law & Society Rev. 105–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Richard E., & Sarat, Austin (1980-81) “Grievances, Claims and Disputes: Assessing the Adversary Culture.” 15 Law & Society Rev. 525–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mnookin, Robert, & Kornhauser, Lewis (1979) “Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law: The Case of Divorce,” 88 Yale Law J. 950–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Center for State Courts (1995) State Court Caseload Statistics. Washington, DC: GPO.Google Scholar
Olson, Walter (1991) The Litigation Explosion: What Happened When America Unleashed the Lawsuit. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Olson, Walter (1997) The Excuse Factory: How Employment Law Is Paralyzing the American Workplace. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, David H., & O'Leary, Rosemary (1997) Public Administration and Law. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael (1992) “Do We Really Know Anything about the Behavior of the Tort Litigation System—and Why Not?” 140 Univ. of Pennsylvania Law Rev. 11471292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sander, Richard H., & Williams, E. Douglass (1989) “Why Are There So Many Lawyers? Perspectives on a Turbulent Market,” Law & Social Inquiry 431–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scalia, Antonin (1981) “Making Law without Making Rules,” Regulation, July–Aug.: 2528.Google Scholar
Sutton, John R., Dobbin, Frank, Meyer, John W., & Scott, W. Richard (1994) “The Legalization of the Workplace,” 99 American J. of Sociology 944–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, C. Neal (1995) “Why the Expansion of Judicial Power?” in Tate, C. N. & Vallinder, T., eds., The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal, & Vallinder, Torbjorn (1995) The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Teubner, Gunther, ed. (1987) Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, David (1981) “The ‘New’ Social Regulation in Historical and Comparative Perspective,” in McGraw, T. K., ed., Regulation in Perspective: Historical Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel (1977) A Critical History of Police Reform: The Emergence of Professionalism. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Walker, Samuel, & Fridell, Lorie (1993) “Forces of Change in Police Policy: The Impact of Tennessee v. Garner on Deadly Force Policy,” 11 American J. of Police 97112.Google Scholar

Cases Cited

Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961).Google Scholar
Monell v. N. Y. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978).Google Scholar

Statutes Cited

42 USC 1983 (Derived § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1871)..Google Scholar
Civil Rights Act of 1964. Public Law 88–352..Google Scholar