Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:05:30.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Litigation as a Local Political Resource: Courts in Controversies over Land Use in France, Germany, and the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Jefferey M. Sellers
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In western Europe as well as in the United States, litigation often operates as a means of political contestation. This article draws on a study of land use disputes in similar U.S., French, and west German metropolitan areas to analyze cross-national differences in the way local political actors employ courts. More an extension of pluralist policymaking patterns in the United States, political litigation in the European settings occurs as part of starker challenges to corporatist and statist patterns. The contrast between centralized and federal governmental arrangements helps to explain why the political consequences of litigation in the French and the German settings also differ.

Type
Articles
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 29 , Issue 3 , 1995 , pp. 475 - 516
Copyright
Copyright © 1995 by The Law and Society Association

Footnotes

Previous versions of this article were presented at the Annual Meetings of the Law and Society Association and the American Political Science Association in 1992. The author thanks participants in those sessions and two anonymous reviewers for suggestions. The Berlin Program for German and European Studies of the Free University of Berlin and the Social Science Research Council, the Council on European Studies, the German Academic Exchange Service and the Graduate School of Yale University helped support the research.

References

Barnes, Samuel H., & Kaase, Max (1979) Political Action. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Battis, Ulrich (1987) Öffentliches Baurecht und Raumordnungsrecht. 2d ed. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Frank R. (1994) “Public Interest Groups in France and the United States.” Working Paper No. 27, Center for Presidential Studies, Texas A & M University.Google Scholar
Bender, Bernd, & Dohle, Rolf (1972) Nachbarschutz im Zivil- und Verwaltungsrecht. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Black, Donald, & Baumgartner, M. P. (1983) “Toward a Theory of the Third Party,” in Boyum, K. & Mather, L., eds., Empirical Theories about Courts. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Blankenburg, Erhard (1994) “Patterns of Legal Culture: Germany Compared to Its Neighbors.” Manuscript, Vrije Universiteit.Google Scholar
Böhme, Rolf (1993) Je mehr wir haben, desto mehr haben wir zu wenig. Bonn: Dietz.Google Scholar
Byrne, Thomas P. (1990) Planning and Zoning in Connecticut. 4th ed. New Britain, CT: Brescia's Printing Services.Google Scholar
Cohen-Tanugi, Laurent (1985) Le Droit sans l'état. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Debbasch, Charles, & Ricci, Jean-Claude (1985) Contentieux administratif. 4th ed. Paris: Dalloz.Google Scholar
Dicey, Albert Venn (1897) Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. 5th ed. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Domhoff, G. William (1978) Who Really Rules? New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Dupuy, François, & Thoenig, Jean-Claude (1983) Sociologie de l'administration française. Paris: Armand Colin.Google Scholar
Dyson, Kenneth H. F. (1980) The State Tradition in Western Europe. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Eisinger, Peter K. (1973) “The Conditions of Protest Behavior in American Cities,” 67 American Political Science Rev. 11.Google Scholar
Elkin, Stephen L. (1974) Politics and Land Use Planning: The London Experience. London: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, & Prewitt, Kenneth (1974) Labyrinths of Democracy. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Fach, Wolfgang, & Simonis, Georg (1987) Die Stärke des Staates im Atomkonflikt. Frankfurt: Campus.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William L. F., Abel, Richard L., & Sarat, Austin (1980–81) “The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming …,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 631.Google Scholar
Grémion, Pierre (1976) Le pouvoir péripherique. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Gunlicks, Arthur B. (1986) Local Government in the German Federal System. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Heidenheimer, Arnold, Heclo, Hugh, & Adams, Carolyn Teich (1990) Comparative Public Policy. 3d ed. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (1990) Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, Donald Wilson, & Tate, C. Neal, eds. (1992) Comparative Judicial Review and Public Policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Justizministerium (1985) Geschäftsbelastung in der Verwaltungs- und Finanzgerichts-barkeit. Bundestagsdrucksache 10/3767. Bonn: Justizministerium.Google Scholar
Justizministerium (1992) “Streitwertkatalog für die Verwaltungsgerichtsbarkeit,” 6 Die Öffentliche Verwaltung 257.Google Scholar
Kaase, Max (1984) “The Challenge of the ‘Participatory Revolution’ in Pluralist Democracies,” 5 International Political Science Rev. 299.Google Scholar
Kagan, Robert A. (1991) “Adversarial Legalism and American Government,” 10 J. of Policy Analysis & Management 369.Google Scholar
Karapin, Roger (1994) “New-Left Social Movements and Public Policy in West Germany, 1969–1989.” Presented at American Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Google Scholar
Katznelson, Ira (1986) “Rethinking the Silences of Social and Economic Policy,” 101 Political Science Q. 307.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven (1981) Regulating America, Regulating Sweden. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. (1986) “Political Opportunity Structures and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies,” 16 British J. of Political Science 57.Google Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert P. (1989) The Logics of Party Formation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasner, Stephen (1977) “United States Commercial and Monetary Policy: Unravelling the Paradox of External Strength and Internal Weakness,” in Katzenstein, P., ed., Between Power and Plenty. Madison: Univ. of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Laumann, Edward O., Knoke, David, & Kim, Yong-hak (1985) “An Organizational Approach to State Policy Formation: A Comparative Study of Energy and Health Domains,” 50 American Sociological Rev. 1.Google Scholar
Logan, John R., & Molotch, Harvey (1987) Urban Fortunes. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.Google Scholar
Mather, Lynn, & Yngvesson, Barbara (1980–81) “Language, Audience, and the Transformation of Disputes,” 15 Law & Society Rev. 775.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally Engle (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, Charles de (1962) L'Esprit des loix. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Morand-Deviller, Madame (1984) “Les tribunaux administratifs et le Conseil d‘État,” Conseil d‘État Études et documents, 1983–1984. Paris.Google Scholar
Nelkin, Dorothy, & Pollak, Michael (1981) The Atom Besieged. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piven, Francis Fox, & Cloward, Richard (1979) Poor People's Movements: How They Succeed, Why They Fail. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Pouvoirs (1988) “Droit administratif: bilan critique,” Pouvoirs, No. 46.Google Scholar
Rapp, Maximillian (1963) “100 Jahre Badischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof,” in H. R. Külz & R. Naumann, Staatsbürger und Staatsgewalt. Vol. 1. Karlsruhe: Verlag C. F. Müller.Google Scholar
Rehbinder, Eckard (1976) “Controlling the Environmental Enforcement Deficit: West Germany,” 24 American J. of Comparative Law 373.Google Scholar
Rondin, Jacques (1985) Le sacre des notables. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald N. (1991) The Hollow Hope. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sabatier, Paul (1993) “Advocacy Koalitionen, Policy-Wandel und Policy-Lernen,” in Windhoff-Heritier, A., ed., Policy-Analyse (Sonderheft No. 24, 0032–3470 Politische Vierteljahresschrift). Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Savitch, H. V. (1988) Post-industrial Cities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Vivien Ann (1990) Democratizing France. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Schmitter, Philippe C. (1979) “Still the Century of Corporatism?” in Schmitter, P. C. & Lehmbruch, Gerhard, eds., Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schneider, Volker (1985) “Corporatist and Pluralist Patterns of Policy-making for Chemicals Control: A Comparison between West Germany and the USA,” in Cawson, A., ed., Organised Interests and the State. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Schonfield, Andrew (1965) Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, Jefferey M. (1994) “Grounds of Democracy: Public Authority and the Politics of Metropolitan Land Use in Three Societies.” Ph.D. diss., Yale Univ.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Martin M. (1981) Courts: A Comparative and Political Analysis. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Martin, & Stone, Alec (1994) “The New Constitutional Politics of Europe,” 26 (4) Comparative Political Studies 397.Google Scholar
Shorter, Edward, & Tilly, Charles (1974) Strikes in France, 1830–1968. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Simmie, James (1981) Power, Property and Corporatism. London: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterett, Susan (1990) “Keeping the Law Up to Date: The Idiom of Legalism and the Reform of Administrative Law in England and Wales,” 15 Law & Social Inquiry 731.Google Scholar
Stone, Alec (1992) The Birth of Judicial Politics in France. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrow, Sidney (1989) Democracy and Disorder: Protest and Politics in Italy 1965–1975. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Tocqueville, Alexis de (1969) Democracy in America, trans. Lawrence, G.. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Co.Google Scholar
Van Waarden, Frans (1992) “The Historical Institutionalization of Typical National Patterns in Policy Networks between State and Industry: A Comparison of the USA and The Netherlands,” 21 European J. of Political Research 131.Google Scholar
Vogel, David (1986) National Styles of Regulation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Weil, Prosper (1964) Le droit administratif. Paris: Presses Univ. de France.Google Scholar
Wieacker, Franz (1967) Privatrechtsgeschichte der Neuzeit. Göttingen: Vanden-hoeck & Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Wilson, Frank L. (1983) “French Interest Group Politics: Pluralist or Neocorporatist?” 77 American Political Science Rev. 895 (1983).Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham (1982) “Why Is There No Corporatism in the United States?” in Lehmbruch, G. & Schmitter, P. C., eds., Patterns of Corporatist Policymaking. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, Raymond E. (1974) The Politics of Progress. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Wollmann, Hellmut, ed. (1985) Rechtstatsachenuntersuchung zur Baugenehmi-gungspraxis. Bonn: Bundesminister für Raumordnung, Bauwesen & Städtebau.Google Scholar