Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:00:48.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Managing Ideologies: Harmony as Ideology in Amish and Japanese Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2024

Robert L. Kidder  and
John A. Hostetler
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Informal methods for dealing with conflict within both Japanese and Amish society have been interpreted as being the natural result of, and an important source of support for, traditional cultures. On closer examination we find similar patterns of intentional manipulation of informalist ideology as elements of strategy in the midst of conflict. In both cases, we find informalist ideology being selectively invoked to provide legitimacy to one or more partisan sides in ways which disguise such maneuvers from the majority of their constituent populations. Successful promotion of this ideology sustains the notion, both at the popular level and heretofore among scholars of dispute processing, that nonlaw methods for dealing with conflict have some special ingredient which makes them functionally superior to legalistic methods. If the Japanese and the Amish are in any way representative of a more general case, it apparently takes hard work to preserve anti-legal methods of dispute management.

Type
Research Article
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , 1990 , pp. 895 - 922
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 The Law and Society Association.

References

References

BAYLEY, David (1977) “Modes and Mores of Policing the Community in Japan,” in Vuylsteke, R. (ed.), Law and Society: Culture Learning Through Law. Honolulu: East-West Center.Google Scholar
DOLBEARE, Kenneth, and James, DAVIS (1968) Little Groups of Neighbors: The Selective Service System. Chicago: Markham Publishing Co.Google Scholar
DURKHEIM, Emile (1933) [1893] The Division of Labor in Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
FELSTINER, William (1974) “Influences of Social Organization on Dispute Processing,” 9 Law & Society Review 63.Google Scholar
FRIEDMAN, Lawrence and Robert, PERCIVAL (1976) “A Tale of Two Courts: Litigation in Alameda and San Benito Counties,” 10 Law & Society Review 267.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1983) “Reading the Landscape of Disputes: What We Know and Don't Know (and Think We Know) About Our Allegedly Contentious and Litigious Society,” 31 U.C.L.A. Law Review 4.Google Scholar
GALANTER, Marc (1974) “Why the ‘Haves’ Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change,” 9 Law & Society Review 95.Google Scholar
GRAMSCI, Antonio (1971) The Prison Notebooks, ed. & trans. Q. Hoare and G. N. Smith, New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
HALEY, John (1978) “The Myth of the Reluctant Litigant,” 4 Journal of Japanese Studies 359.Google Scholar
HARRINGTON, Christine B., and Sally Engle, MERRY (1988) “Ideological Production: The Making of Community Mediation,” 22 Law & Society Review 709.Google Scholar
HEINZ, John, and Edward, LAUMANN (1982) Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar. New York: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
HOSTETLER, John (1980) Amish Society. 3d ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
KAWASHIMA, Takeyoshi (1963) “Dispute Resolution in Contemporary Japan,” in von Mehren, A. T. (ed.), Law in Japan: The Legal Order of a Changing Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
KIDDER, Robert (1990) “Sources of Success and Failure in Amish Dispute Management.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Law and Society Association, Berkeley, CA, 1990.Google Scholar
KINSINGER, Susan (1988) A Family History. Gordonville, PA: Gordonville Print Shop.Google Scholar
KRAYBILL, Donald B. (1989) The Riddle of Amish Culture. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
LAW & SOCIETY REVIEW (1988) “Law and Ideology,” 22 (4) Law & Society Review (Special Issue).Google Scholar
LEMPERT, Richard (1978) “More Tales of Two Courts: Exploring Changes in the ‘Dispute Settlement Function’ of Trial Courts,” 13 Law & Society Review 90.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1979) “Lawyers and Consumer Protection Law,” 14 Law & Society Review 161.Google Scholar
MACAULAY, Stewart (1963) “Non-contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study,” 28 American Sociological Review 55.Google Scholar
McKEAN, Margaret (1981) Environmental Protest and Citizen Politics in Japan. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NELSON, Robert L., and John P., HEINZ (with Laumann, Edward O. and Sanders, Joseph) (1988) “Lawyers and the Structure of Influence in Washington,” 22 Law & Society Review 237.Google Scholar
RAMSEYER, J. Mark, and Minoru, NAKAZATO (1989) “The Rational Litigant: Settlement Amounts and Verdict Rates in Japan,” 18 Journal of Legal Studies 263.Google Scholar
SUMNER, William Graham (1906) Folkways: A Study of the Sociological Importance of Usages, Manners, Customs, Mores, and Morals. Boston: Ginn.Google Scholar
TANASE, Takao (1990) “The Management of Disputes: Automobile Accident Compensation in Japan,” 24 Law & Society Review 651.Google Scholar
UNGER, Roberto Mangabeira (1976) Law in Modern Society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
UPHAM, Frank (1987) Law and Social Change in Postwar Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
YATES, Ronald E. (1989) “Ralph Nader of Japan Dogs the Auto Industry,” Mainichi Daily News, 4 Oct.Google Scholar
YNGVESSON, Barbara and Patricia, HENNESSEY (1975) “Small Claims, Complex Disputes: A Review of the Small Claims Literature,” 9 Law & Society Review 219.Google Scholar
YOSHIYUKI, Noda (1976) Introduction to Japanese Law. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar

Case Cited

Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).Google Scholar