Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:27:54.336Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Safe and Sound Judgment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Mark Atlas
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Many points raised by Dr. Evan J. Ringquist's response in this issue already are addressed in my article, so readers should simply review its relevant portions. Just as he indicated that space constraints limited his response, I am limited to focusing on his comments that are less fully addressed in my article.

Type
Forum on Environmental Equity Research
Information
Law & Society Review , Volume 35 , Issue 3 , 2001 , pp. 699 - 708
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 Law and Society Association.

References

Atlas, Mark (2001) “Rush to Judgment: An Empirical Analysis of Environmental Equity in U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 633–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubasek, Nancy, & Silverman, Gary (2000) Environmental Law. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Lavelle, Marianne, & Coyle, Marcia (1992) “Unequal Protection: The Racial Divide in Environmental Law,” 21 National Law J. S1–S12 (September 21).Google Scholar
McSpadden, Lettie (1997) “Environmental Policy in the Courts,” in Vig, N. & Kraft, M., eds., Environmental Policy in the 1990s, 3rd ed., Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Ringquist, Evan (1998) “A Question of Justice: Equity in Environmental Litigation, 1974–1991,” 60 J. of Politics 1148–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan (2001) “The Need for Sound Judgment in Analyzing U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Enforcement Actions,” 35 Law & Society Rev. 683–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringquist, Evan, & Emmert, Craig (1999) “Judicial Policymaking in Published and Unpublished Decisions: The Case of Environmental Civil Litigation,” 52 Political Research Q. 7–37.Google Scholar