Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-j4qg9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T04:35:24.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Designated Compensable Events: A No-Fault Approach to Medical Malpractice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

Laurence R. Tancredi
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been seven years since the last major medical malpractice crisis, when the cost of liability insurance rose so astronomically that several important insurers withdrew from providing insurance coverage to physicians and health care institutions. Government and private policy groups at that time established committees to evaluate the medical malpractice crisis and to recommend changes that would bring about an amelioration of the adverse financial and health care features surrounding medical malpractice. The United States Department of Health, Education and Welfare published its Report of the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice in 1973, documenting the extent of the crisis and recommending that alterations be made in the existing tort law to alleviate some of the financial burdens brought on by the increasing number of cases. In 1977, the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences formed a Steering Committee on Medical injury Compensation that reviewed some of the special problems of the medical malpractice system and published its report.

Type
Article
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 10 , Issue 6 , October 1982 , pp. 200 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © 1982 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Furrow, B., Iatrogenesis and Medical Error: The Case for Medical Malpractice Litigation. Law, Medicine & Health Care 9(5): 4 (October 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Havighurst, C.C. Tancredi, L.R., “Medical Adversity Insurance” — A No-Fault Approach to Medical Malpractice and Quality Assurance, Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 51:125 (1973), reprinted in Insurance Law Journal 69:613 (1974).Google ScholarPubMed

References

Department of Health, Education & Welfare, Report of the Secretary's Commission on Medical Malpractice (U.S. Gov't Printing Office, Washington, D.C) (1973) (DHEW Pub. No. (OS) 73-88).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine, National Academy of Sciences, Beyond Malpractice: Compensation for Medical Injuries (National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.) (1978) [hereinafter referred to as IOM Report].Google Scholar
Ehrenzweig, A. Compulsory, “Hospital-Accident” Insurance: A Needed First Step toward the Displacement of Liability for “Medical Malpractice,” University of Chicago Law Review 31:279 (1964).Google Scholar
Id. at 284.Google Scholar
Havighurst, C.C. Tancredi, L.R., “Medical Adversity Insurance” — A No-Fault Approach to Medical Malpractice and Quality Assurance, Insurance Law Journal 613:69, 70 (1974). [hereinafter referred to as No-Fault Approach] [originally printed in Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly 51:125 (1973)]. See also Havighurst, C.C., “Medical Adversity Insurance—Has Its Time Come.? Duke Law Journal 1975(6):1233 (1975).Google Scholar
O’Connell, J., An Elective No Fault Liability Statute, Insurance Law Journal 628:261, 264 (1975). [hereinafter referred to as An Elective No Fault Liability Statute]. See also O’Connell, J., Ending Insult to Injury: No-Fault Insurance for Products and Services (University of Illinois Press, Urbana) (1975).Google Scholar
Tancredi, L.R., No-Fault and Medical Malpractice: The Causation Issues of Defining Compensable Events, Inquiry 14:341 (1977).Google ScholarPubMed
An Elective No Fault Liability Statute, supra note 7, at 264.Google Scholar
No-Fault Approach, supra note 6.Google Scholar
Boyden, J.R. Tancredi, L.R., Part III: Identification of Designated Compensable Events (DCEs), in Commission on Medical Professional Liability, Designated Compensable Event System: A Feasibility Study (American Bar Association, Washington, D.C.) (1979) [hereinafter referred to as ABA Study].Google Scholar
National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Malpractice Claims (NAIC, Milwaukee, Wisc.) (May 1977) [hereinafter referred to as NAIC Study].Google Scholar
Westat, Inc., 1976 Medical Malpractice Closed Claims Study (May 1978) (final report for DHEW contract No. 282-76-TQ-0497).Google Scholar
California Medical Association & California Hospital Association, Report on the Medical Insurance Feasibility Study (Sutter Publications, San Francisco) (1977) [hereinafter referred to as Feasibility Study].Google Scholar
Some of these outcomes from surgery are: Foreign body unintentionally left in operation site; death during surgical operation other than with a bad-risk patient; puncture or laceration wounds of viscera or blood vessels requiring reparative operations; complete paralysis following anesthesia; and complication of common duct injury (immediate, early, and delayed).Google Scholar
Some of these final adverse medical outcomes from orthopedic surgery are: Nerve injury following orthopedic procedure; postoperative infections, particularly if they involve a clean, uncontaminated surface; malunion of fracture with functional impairment; compartment syndromes in the lower extremities; and Volkmann's ischemic contracture following orthopedic procedure.Google Scholar
See Feasibility Study, supra note 14 (articulation of concept).Google Scholar
ABA Study, supra note 11, at 5.Google Scholar
Id. at 21.Google Scholar
See, e.g., IOM Report, supra note 3, at 40.Google Scholar
See, e.g., No-Fault Approach, supra note 6, at 89.Google Scholar