Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:09:15.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What are Society's Interests in Human Genetics and Reproductive Technologies?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2021

John C. Fletcher
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review Essay
Information
Law, Medicine and Healthcare , Volume 16 , Issue 1-2 , Spring 1988 , pp. 131 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

McCormick, R.A., How Brave a New World? (Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 1985), 79, 172.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J.C.et al., “Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Study in 17 Nations,” in Vogel, F. Sperling, K., eds., Human Genetics: Proceedings of the 7th National Congress (Berlin, 1986; Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1987), 657–72. Results from a nineteen-nation study will be published in Wertz, D.C. Fletcher, J.C., Ethics and Human Genetics: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, in preparation). See also U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, New Developments in Biotechnology, Background Paper: Public Perceptions of Biotechnology, OTA-BP-BA-45 (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, May 1987).Google Scholar
Modell, , “Perspectives in Fetal Diagnosis of Congenital Diseases,” report delivered at WHO/Serono meeting, 1985.Google Scholar
Forsman, I., Genetic Services Branch, Division of Maternal and Child Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, personal communication, July 1, 1986.Google Scholar
Fletcher, et al., supra note 2.Google Scholar
President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research, Screening and Counseling for Genetic Conditions (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1983), 44.Google Scholar
Swiss Society for Medical Genetics, Med Genet (Zurich, April 12, 1984). 11.Google Scholar
Sorenson, J.R., “From Social Movement to Clinical Medicine: The Role of Law and the Medical Profession in Regulation of Applied Human Genetics,” in Milunsky, A. Annas, G.J., eds., Genetics and the Law (New York: Plenum, 1975), 467; Fraser, F.C. Pressor, C., “Attitudes of Counselors in Relation to Prenatal Sex Determination for Choice of Sex,” in Lubs, H.A. de la Cruz, F., eds., Genetic Counseling (New York: Raven Press, 1977), 109.Google Scholar
Powledge, T.M. Fletcher, J.C., “Guidelines for the Ethical, Social, and Legal Issues in Prenatal Diagnosis,” New England Journal of Medicine, 300 (1979): 168–71.Google Scholar
Hamerton, J.L.et al., “Chromosome Disease,” in Hamerton, J.L. Simpson, N.E., eds., Prenatal Diagnosis, Past, Present and Future (Report of an International Workshop), Prenatal Diagnosis (Special Issue), 1980, p. 11.Google Scholar
President's Commission, supra note 6, at 56–58.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, supra note 2, at 74–75.Google Scholar
Fletcher, et al., supra note 2.Google Scholar