Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-pt5lt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T16:23:18.120Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Excerpts from the Best Memorials, 1992 Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 July 2009

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Telders International Law Moot Court Competition
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation of the Leiden Journal of International Law 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 An. 5, Draft Articles on State Responsibility, II–1 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n, U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/246 (1974), at 277; I. Brownlie, I State Responsibility 446 (1990); J.G. Starke, Introduction to International Law 295 (1989); B. Cheng, General Principles of International Law as applied by International Courts and Tribunals 184(1987).

2 See Gertnide Parker Massey(USA) v. United Mexican States, April 27, 1927, IV Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 155, at 159; Art. 5, Draft Articles on State Responsibility, supra note 1, at 277.

3 Art 10, Draft Articles, supra note 1, at 277; Claim of the Salvador Commercial Company, et al.. May 8, 1902, XV Rep. of Int'l Art). Awards 467 at 477.

4 Draft Articles, II–l Y.B.I.L. Comm'n 241 (1971), U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/233.

5 Francisco Mallén (United Mexican States) v. USA, April 27, 1927, IV Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 173, at 177.

6 E. Jiminéz de Aréchaga, International Responsibility, M. Soerensen (ed.). Manual of Public International Law, at 549; See also William T. Way v. United Mexican Slates, October 18,1928, IV Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 391. at 393; Mallen Case, supra note 5, at 177.

7 Art. 10, Draft Articles, II–1 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n 61 (1975), U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/SER.A/1975/Add. 1.

8 Art. 10, Draft Articles, see note 7, at 61; Thomas. H. Youmans (USA) v. United Mexican States, November 23, 1923, IV Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 10, at 116.

9 See also Art. 3 Draft Articles, at 276: II–1 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n 188 (1970). U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/233.

10 I. Brownlie, Principles of Public International Law 303 (1990).

11 United Slates Diplomatic and Consular Staffin Teheran, (USA v. Iran), May 24, 1980, 1980 I.C.J. Rep. 3, at 29; Cheng, supra note 1, at 184; Art. 11, Draft Articles, II–1 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n, at 70.

12 Draft Articles, II–l Y.B.I.L. Comm'n 281, at 282 (1974).

13 Case of Certain Norwegian Loans, May 24, 1980, 1980 I.C.J. Rep. 9 at 96; I–1 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n 28 (1970); G.A. Christenson, The Doctrine of Attribution in State Responsibility, R.A. Lillich (ed.), International Law of State Responsibility for Injuries to Aliens.

14 B.D. Smith, State Responsibility and the Marine Environment, The Rules of Decision (1988) at 36.

15 Chorzow Factory Case (Indemnities), November 21, 1927, I.C J. Rep. 1970 at 29; Starke supra note 1, at 307.

16 See B. Cheng supra note 1, at 253; see also Brownlie (1983) supra note 1, at 225.

17 Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company and other (United States) v. Germany, September 18, 1924, VII Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 91, at 245; Administrative Decision of German-American Mixed Claims Commission, November 1, 1973, VII Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 23, at 29–30.

18 Currie case, Anglo-Italian Conciliation Commission, March 13,1954, XIV Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards, at 24.

19 M.M. Whiteman, III Damages in International Law, 1806 (1937).

20 Opinion in the Lusitania Cases, November 1, 1923, VII Rep. of Int'l Arb. Awards 32, at 41.

21 See Smith, supra note 14, at 57.

22 F.A. Mann, Further Studies in International Law 41 (1990).

23 B. Cheng, supra note 1, at 149.

24 I. Brownlie, supra note 1, at 307.

25 D. Lange and G. Borne (eds.). The Extraterritorial Application of National Laws, The International Chamber of Commerce (1987), at 17.

26 Id..

27 O. Schachter, International Law in Theorie and Practice 261 (1991).

28 Art. 6(1), Draft Articles, I–2 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n (1985), U.N. Doc. A/CN.4/SER. A 1985, at 85.

29 United States Diplomatic and Consular Staff in Tehran, supra note 11, at 29.

30 Art. 6(2a), Draft Articles. 1–2 Y.B.I.L. Comm'n, supra note 1, at 85.

31 I. Brownlie, supra note 1, at 402.

32 Amoco International Finance Corporation v. Iran, July 14,1987,15 Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal Rep. 187 (1987), at 223.

33 British Petroleum Company v. Lybia, August 1, 1974, 53 I.L.R. 297 (1977), at 317.

34 Amoco case, supra note 32, at 223.

35 Sornarajah, M., Compensation for Expropriation, the Emergence of New Standards, 13 Journal of World Trade Law 108, at 108.Google Scholar

36 Id., at 131.

37 Chorzow Factory case (Judgement), September 13, 1928, 1928 P.C.I.J. Rep., Ser. A No. 12, 4 at 29.

38 The American Independent Oil Company (Aminoil) v. Kuwait, March 24, 1982, 21 I.L.M. (1982) 976, at 1031; Texaco Overseas Petroleum Company and California Asiatic Oil Company v. Libya, January 19, 1977, 53 I.L.R. (1977) 389, at 497.

39 Amoco case, supra note 32, at 247; British Petroleum case, supra note 33, at 337; M. Pellonpää and M. Fitzmaurice, Taking of Property in the Practice of the Iran-US. Claims Tribunal, XIX N.Y.I.L. 53 (1988), at 124.

40 Chorzow Factory case (Judgment), supra note 15, at 47.

41 The Temple of Preah Vihear case, 1962 I.C.J. Rep., at 23.