Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T18:30:29.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Lecanactis (Roccellaceae) in Tasmania, with the description of a new saxicolous species and a revised key for the genus in Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2021

Gintaras Kantvilas*
Affiliation:
Tasmanian Herbarium, Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery, Box 5158, UTAS LPO, Sandy Bay, Tasmania7005, Australia
*
Author for correspondence: Gintaras Kantvilas. E-mail: Gintaras.Kantvilas@tmag.tas.gov.au

Abstract

The lichen genus Lecanactis Körb. in Tasmania comprises six species: L. abietina (Ach.) Körb., which is widespread and pan-temperate; L. latispora Egea & Torrente and L. neozelandica Egea & Torrente, both shared with New Zealand and with the former recorded here from the Auckland Islands for the first time; L. mollis (Stirt.) Frisch & Ertz, shared with Victoria and New Zealand; L. aff. dilleniana (Ach.) Körb., a European species recorded provisionally for Tasmania on the basis of several sterile collections; L. scopulicola Kantvilas, which is described here as new to science and apparently a Tasmanian endemic. This new taxon occurs in rocky underhangs and is characterized by a thick, leprose thallus containing schizopeltic acid, and 3-septate ascospores, 19–30 × 4.5–6 μm. Short descriptions and a discussion of distribution and ecology are given for all species. A key for all 11 Australian species of the genus is provided, including L. subfarinosa (C. Knight) Hellb. and L. tibelliana Egea & Torrente, which are recorded for Australia for the first time, and L. platygraphoides (Müll.Arg.) Zahlbr., a first record for New South Wales. Lecanactis spermatospora Egea & Torrente and L. sulphurea Egea & Torrente are also included.

Type
Standard Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Lichen Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dodge, CW (1948) Lichens and lichen parasites. BANZARE Reports, Series B 7, 1276.Google Scholar
Egea, JM and Torrente, P (1993 a) The lichen genus Bactrospora Massal. Lichenologist 25, 211255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egea, JM and Torrente, P (1993 b) Cresponea, a new genus of lichenized fungi in the order Arthoniales (Ascomycotina). Mycotaxon 48, 301331.Google Scholar
Egea, JM and Torrente, P (1994) El género de hongos liquenizados Lecanactis (Ascomycotina). Bibliotheca Lichenologica 54, 1205.Google Scholar
Elix, JA, Giralt, M and Wardlaw, JH (2003) New chloro-depsides from the lichen Dimelaena radiata. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 86, 17.Google Scholar
Ertz, D, Tehler, A, Irestedt, M, Frisch, A, Thor, G and van den Boom, P (2014 [2015]) A large-scale phylogenetic revision of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales) reveals eight new genera. Fungal Diversity 70, 3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galloway, DJ (2007) Flora of New Zealand Lichens. Revised Second Edition. Volume 1. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Jaklitsch, W, Baral, H-O, Lücking, R and Lumbsch, HT (2016) Syllabus of Plant Families. Adolf Engler's Syllabus der Pflanzenfamilien. Part 1/2: Ascomycota, 13th edition by Wolfgang Frey. Stuttgart: Borntraeger Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Kantvilas, G (1988) Tasmanian rainforest lichen communities: a preliminary classification. Phytocoenologia 22, 355390.Google Scholar
Kantvilas, G (2004) A contribution to the Roccellaceae in Tasmania: new species and notes on Lecanactis and allied genera. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 34(1), 183203.Google Scholar
Kantvilas, G (2020) Contributions to the lichen genus Cresponea (Roccellaceae). Lichenologist 52, 279285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantvilas, G and Jarman, SJ (1999) Lichens of Rainforest in Tasmania and South-Eastern Australia. Flora of Australia Supplementary Series No. 9. Canberra: Australian Biological Resource Study.Google Scholar
Kantvilas, G, Gueidan, C and Tehler, A (2020) The strange case of Ocellomma rediuntum (Arthoniales: Roccellaceae) in Australia: a remarkably disjunct lichen. Lichenologist 52, 187195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kondratyuk, SY, Lőkös, L, Farkas, E, Oh, S-O and Hur, J-S (2015) New and noteworthy lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi 3. Acta Botanica Hungarica 57, 345382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, PM (2020) Checklist of the Lichens of Australia and its Island Territories. Australian Biological Resources Study, Canberra. Version 1 March 2020. [WWW resource] URL http://www.anbg.gov.au/abrs/lichenlist/introduction.html.Google Scholar
Orange, A, James, PW and White, FJ (2010) Microchemical Methods for the Identification of Lichens, 2nd Edn. London: British Lichen Society.Google Scholar
Tehler, A (1990) A new approach to the phylogeny of Euascomycetes with a cladistic outline of Arthoniales focussing on Roccellaceae. Canadian Journal of Botany 68, 24582492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tehler, A and Egea, JM (1997) The phylogeny of Lecanactis (Opegraphaceae). Lichenologist 29, 397414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrente, P and Egea, JM (1989) La familia Opegraphaceae en el Area Mediterránea de la Península Iberica y Norte de Africa. Bibliotheca Lichenologica 32, 1282.Google Scholar
Wolseley, PA, Purvis, OW and Rose, F (2009) Lecanactis Körb. (1855). In Smith, CW, Aptroot, A, Coppins, BJ, Fletcher, A, Gilbert, OL, James, PW and Wolseley, PA (eds), The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. London: British Lichen Society, pp. 452453.Google Scholar