Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T20:57:49.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Indigenous Management Research in China from an Engaged Scholarship Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Andrew H. Van de Ven  and
Runtian Jing
Andrew H. Van de Ven
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, U.S.
Runtian Jing
Affiliation:
University of Electronic Science and Technology, China
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This commentary discusses the four articles in this special MOR issue on indigenous management research in China. It begins by recognizing the importance of indigenous research not only for understanding the specific knowledge of local phenomena, but also for advancing general theoretical knowledge across cultural boundaries. Challenging to undertake, we propose a method of engaged scholarship for conducting indigenous research. The four articles in this special issue provide good examples of applying principles of engaged scholarship in their indigenous Chinese management studies.

Keywords

Chinacultureengaged scholarshipindigenous research中国文化参与性学者本土研究
Type
Special Issue Commentary
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 8 , Issue 1: Special Issue Indigenous Management Research in China , March 2012 , pp. 123 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barney, J. B., & Zhang, S. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: A theory of Chinese management versus a Chinese theory of management. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 15–28.Google Scholar
Boyer, E. 1996. The scholarship of engagement. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 1(1): 11–20.Google Scholar
Carlile, P. R. 2004. Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5): 555–568.Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S. 1995a. The relationship between authoritarianism and leadership: Evidence from Taiwan. Research report for the project awarded by Taiwan's National Science Council. Taiwan: National Science Council. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S. 1995b. Paternalistic authority and leadership: A case study of a Taiwanese CEO. Bulletin of the Institute of Ethnology Academia Sinica, 79(1): 119–173. (In Chinese.)Google Scholar
Cheng, B. S., Wang, A. C., & Huang, M. P. 2009. The road more popular versus the road less travelled: An ‘insider's’ perspective of advancing Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 91–105.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. 1995. Comments on ‘What theory is not’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3): 391–396.Google Scholar
Fang, T. 2012. Yin Yang: A new perspective on culture. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. 2000. A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In Li, J. T., Tsui, A. S. & Weldon, E. (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context: 85-127. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hofstede, G. 1994. Management scientists are human. Management Science, 40(1): 4–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, A. S. 1999. Writing for scholarly publication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Kenworthy-U'Ren, A. 2005. Toward a scholarship of engagement: A dialogue between Andy Van de Ven and Edward Zlotkowski (edited by Kenworthy-U'Ren, A.). Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 355–362.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2010. Beliefs in Chinese culture. In Bond, M. H. (Ed.), Oxford handbook of Chinese psychology: 221-240. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Leung, K., Li, P. P., Chen, C. C., & Luo, J. 2009. Call for papers: Management and Organization Review special issue on 'Indigenous management research in China. Management and Organization Review, 5(3): 431–432.Google Scholar
Li, P. P. 2011. Toward an integrative framework of indigenous research: The geocentric implications of Yin-Yang Balance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, DOI: 10.1007/510490-011-9250-2.Google Scholar
Ma, D. 2012. A relational view of organizational restructuring: The case of transitional China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 51–75.Google Scholar
Pan, Y., Rowncy, J. A., & Peterson, M. F. 2012. The structure of Chinese cultural tradition: An empirical study of business employees in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 77–95.Google Scholar
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. 2008. Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34: 566–593.Google Scholar
Redding, S. G. 1990. The spirit of Chinese capitalism. Berlin, New York: W. de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Silin, R. H. 1976. Leadership and value: The organization of large-scale Taiwan enterprises. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Smith, L. T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books Limited.Google Scholar
Stening, B. W., & Zhang, M. Y. 2007. Methodological problems confronted when conducting management research in China. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 7(1): 121–142.Google Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2004. Contributing to global management knowledge: A case for high quality indigenous research. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21(4): 491–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsui, A. S. 2009. Editor's introduction - Autonomy of inquiry: Shaping the future of emerging scientific communities. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 1–14.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. 2002. 2001 Presidential address - Strategic directions for the Academy of Management: This academy is for you! Academy of Management Review, 27(2): 171–184.Google Scholar
Van de Ven, A. H. 2007. Engaged scholarship: A guide for organizational and social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Glinow, M. A., & Teagarden, M. B. 2009. The future of Chinese management research: Rigour and relevance redux. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 75–89.Google Scholar
Westwood, R. I., & Chan, A. 1992. Headship and leadership. In Westwood, R. I. (Ed.), Organizational behavior- Southeast Asian perspectives: 118-143. Hong Kong: Longman.Google Scholar
Whetten, D. 2009. An examination of the interface between context and theory applied to the study of Chinese organizations. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 29–55.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. 2008. Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Halifax, NS: Fernwood.Google Scholar
Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. 2012. Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1): 97–121.Google Scholar
Zhao, S., & Jiang, C. 2009. Learning by doing: Emerging paths of Chinese management research. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 107–119.Google Scholar