Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T00:55:13.889Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commitment to Excellence: Upholding Research Integrity at Management and OrganizationReview

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

Anne S. Tsui1  and
Joseph Galaskiewicz
Anne S. Tsui1
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, USA Peking University, China
Joseph Galaskiewicz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
Management and Organization Review , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , November 2011 , pp. 389 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2011

References

Aguinis, H., & Vaschette, S.J. 2011. Editorial responsibility: Managing the publishing process to do good and do well. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 407–422.Google Scholar
Ayala, F.J. 2009. Darwin and the scientific method. Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences, 106: 10033–10039.Google Scholar
Bapuji, H., & Laplume, A. 2010. Missing the forest from the trees: A reply. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 157–161.Google Scholar
Beamish, P. W., & Bapuji, H. 2009. Erratum. Management and Organization Review, 5(1): 150.Google Scholar
Chen, X. P. 2011. Author ethical dilemmas in the research publication process. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 423–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, M. 2010. Erratum response to Beamish and Bapuji. Management and Organization Review, 6(1): 151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ham, V. 1999. Tracking the truth of selling one's soul? Reflections on a piece of commissioned research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 47(3): 275–282.Google Scholar
Jacobs, A. 2010, Oct. 6. Rampant fraud threat to China's brisk ascent. New York Times. [Last accessed 27 June 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/07/world/asia/07fraud.html. Google Scholar
Jelfery, D. D., & Fries, J. 2011. Unauthorized uses of a coauthored work and a doctoral dissertation. Ethics & Behavior, 21(2): 118–126.Google Scholar
Kirkman, B. L., & Chen, G. 2011. Maximizing your data or data slicing? Recommendations for management multiple submissions from the same dataset. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 433–446.Google Scholar
Lee, T. W., & Mitchell, T. R. 2011. Working in research teams: Lessons from personal experiences. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 461–469.Google Scholar
Leung, K. 2011. Presenting post hoc hypotheses as a priori: Ethical and theoretical issues. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 471–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mowday, R. T. 2011. Elevating the dialogue on professional ethics to the next level: Reflections on the experience of the Academy of Management. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 505–509.Google Scholar
Regmi, K. 2011. Ethnical and legal issues in publication and dissemination of scholarly knowledge: A summary of the published evidence. Journal of Academic Ethics, 9: 71–81.Google Scholar
Resnik, D. B., Patrone, D., & Peddada, S. 2010. Research misconduct policies of social science journals and impact factor. Accountability in Research, 17: 79–84.Google Scholar
Rogers, L. 1999. Salami slicing, shotgunning, and the ethics of authorship. American Journal of Roentgenology, 173(2): 265.Google Scholar
Rupp, D. E. 2011. Ethical issues faced by editors and reviewers. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schminke, M., & Ambrose, M. 2011. Ethics and integrity in the publishing process: Myths, facts, and a roadmap. Management and Organization Review, 7(3): 397–406.Google Scholar
Souder, L. 2011. The ethics of scholarly peer review: A review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 24(1): 55–74.Google Scholar
Stcen, R. G. 2011. Retractions in the scientific literature: Do authors deliberately commit research fraud? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37: 113–117.Google Scholar
Wager, E., Fiack, S., Graf, C., Robinson, A., & Rowlands, I. 2009. Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: Results of an international survey. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35: 348–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, D. E., Titus, S. L., & Cornelison, J. B. 2008. Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14: 323–336.Google Scholar
Zeng, W., & Resnik, D. 2010. Research integrity in China: Problems and prospects. Developing World Bioethics, 10(3): 164–171.Google Scholar