Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-tsvsl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T19:11:04.772Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An analogy for beams of particles of a reciprocal optical theorem due to Helmholtz

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. H. Fowler
Affiliation:
Trinity College.

Extract

There is a theorem in geometrical optics due to Helmholtz which states that if a ray of light (1) after any number of refractions and reflections at plane or nearly plane surfaces gives rise (among others) to a ray (2) whose intensity is a certain fraction f12 of the intensity of the ray (1), then on reversing the path of the light an incident ray (2)′ will give rise, among others, to a ray (1)′ whose intensity is a fraction f21 of the ray (2)′, such that

The surfaces if not plane must be such that their radius of curvature is large compared with the lateral extent of the ray and this lateral extent must itself be large compared with the wave-lengths in the ray. In view of the many recent studies of reflection and transmission (refraction) of beams of electrons at potential walls, it seems worth while to ask whether there exists an analogy of the optical theorem for beams of electrons (or other particles). It is easy to see that the analogy must exist by using the principle of detailed balancing required by an assembly in statistical equilibrium. But a direct “dynamical” proof is also easy and may prove of sufficient practical interest to put on record here.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1929

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Lorentz, , Problems of Modern Physics, p. 168 and Appendix 17.Google Scholar

Weyl, , Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, § 13.Google Scholar

Jeffreys, , Proc. London Hath. Soc., vol. XXIII (1925), p. 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Distribution laws are discussed at length in this form by Fowler, , Statistical Mechanics (1929), pp. 538 sqq.Google Scholar