Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 October 2008
There is a theorem in geometrical optics due to Helmholtz which states that if a ray of light (1) after any number of refractions and reflections at plane or nearly plane surfaces gives rise (among others) to a ray (2) whose intensity is a certain fraction f12 of the intensity of the ray (1), then on reversing the path of the light an incident ray (2)′ will give rise, among others, to a ray (1)′ whose intensity is a fraction f21 of the ray (2)′, such that
The surfaces if not plane must be such that their radius of curvature is large compared with the lateral extent of the ray and this lateral extent must itself be large compared with the wave-lengths in the ray. In view of the many recent studies of reflection and transmission (refraction) of beams of electrons at potential walls, it seems worth while to ask whether there exists an analogy of the optical theorem for beams of electrons (or other particles). It is easy to see that the analogy must exist by using the principle of detailed balancing required by an assembly in statistical equilibrium. But a direct “dynamical” proof is also easy and may prove of sufficient practical interest to put on record here.
† Lorentz, , Problems of Modern Physics, p. 168 and Appendix 17.Google Scholar
‡ Weyl, , Gruppentheorie und Quantenmechanik, § 13.Google Scholar
† Jeffreys, , Proc. London Hath. Soc., vol. XXIII (1925), p. 428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
† Distribution laws are discussed at length in this form by Fowler, , Statistical Mechanics (1929), pp. 538 sqq.Google Scholar