Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T05:02:18.632Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of a magnetic field on relative gravity determinations with invar pendulums

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

E. C. Bullard
Affiliation:
Clare College (Department of Geodesy and Geophysics, Cambridge.)

Extract

The effect of changes in magnetic moment and in the earth's field on the period of invar pendulums used for relative gravity determinations is discussed, and methods of eliminating them by the use of Mumetal screens are described.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1933

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Invar is an alloy of Fe and Ni containing about 36 % of Ni. It is ferromagnetic with an initial permeability of about 2000 (Int. Crit. Tables, vol. 6, pp. 395 and 397). See Guillaume, , Proc. Phys. Soc. vol. 32, p. 374, 1919Google Scholar, for an account of its properties.

SirLenox-Conyngham, G. P., Geog. Journ. vol. 73, p. 326, 1929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

This simple magnetometer has proved very satisfactory for measuring the small deflections involved (usually a few minutes of are).

* Z is taken positive when the field is directed downwards, and M 0 positive when the bob is a North Pole.

* A similar result has been obtained by Meisser, , Martin, , and Gengler, , Ger. Béi. f. Geophys., Ergzbd., Heft 2, p. 131, 1932.Google Scholar

* The pendulum has to be left for 2 hours after handling, to attain temperature equilibrium. It therefore takes at least 3 hours to get a point on Fig. 5.

* A steel containing about 78 % Ni, having a permeability up to 80,000.

* In course of publication.

They are similar to the “electrostatic control” in the quadrant electrometer. Beattie, , The Electrician, vol. 65, p. 729, 1910.Google Scholar