Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-49v7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-02T13:20:03.586Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Momentum distribution in molecular systems

Part VII. Momentum distribution and shape of the Compton line for Li2 and N2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

W. E. Duncanson
W. E. Duncanson
Affiliation:
University CollegeLondon, c/o University College of North Wales Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Hughes and Mann(1) have shown that, under certain conditions, the distribution curve of the energies of electrons scattered inelastically by an atom or molecule has the same shape as that of the X-ray Compton line. Hughes and his collaborators (1–5) have applied the method to an examination of a number of atoms and molecules in the gaseous state under which condition it can be assumed that each atom or molecule acts as an independent scattering centre. Coulson and the author (6–11) have applied quantum methods to derive a theoretical shape of the Compton line for certain of the molecules for which wave functions are available and have discussed the discrepancy between the experimental and the theoretical results(10, 11).

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 39 , Issue 3 , October 1943 , pp. 180 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1943

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Hughes, and Mann, . Phys. Rev. 53 (1938), 50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Hughes, and West, . Phys. Rev. 50 (1936), 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Hughes, and Starr, . Phys. Rev. 54 (1938), 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Hughes, and Starr, . Phys. Rev. 55 (1939), 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Hughes, and Enns, . Phys. Rev. 60 (1941), 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Coulson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 55 (Part I).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Coulson, and Duncanson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 67 (Part II).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Coulson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 74 (Part III).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(9)Duncanson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 397 (Part IV).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(10)Duncanson, and Coulson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 37 (1941), 406 (Part V).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Coulson, and Duncanson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 38 (1942), 100 (Part VI).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Kirkpatrick, and DuMond, . Phys. Rev. 54 (1938), 802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(13)Hicks, . Phys. Rev. 52 (1937), 436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Duncanson, and Coulson, . Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 181 (1943), 378.Google Scholar
(15)Coulson, . Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc. 38 (1942), 210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar