Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wtssw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-08T14:15:11.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the geometry of homotopy invariants of links

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Washington Mio
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306-3027, U.S.A.

Extract

One of the central problems in higher-dimensional knot theory is the classification of links up to concordance. In 14, Le Dimet constructed a universal model for (disk) link complements, which allowed him to formulate this problem in the framework of surgery theory by applying the Cappell-Shaneson program for studying codimension two embeddings of manifolds 1. The concordance classification was reduced to questions in L-theory (-groups 1) and homotopy theory (of Vogel local spaces 14). While recent results of Cochran and Orr2 (see also 18) provide rich information on the -theoretic part of the problem (in particular, they settle the question of the existence of links not concordant to boundary links), little is known about Le Dimet's homotopy invariant of links; for example, it is not known whether it may ever be non-trivial, or phrasing it more geometrically (according to 19), whether there are links that are not concordant to sublinks of homology boundary links. This motivated us to look at simpler classes of links, for which a more direct geometric approach to the problem is also possible, in an attempt to get some insight on the geometry carried by the homotopy invariants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Cappell, S. and Shaneson, J.. The codimension two placement problem and homology equivalent manifolds. Ann. of Math. (2) 99 (1974), 277348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cochran, T. and Orr, K.. Not all links are concordant to boundary links. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 23 (1990), 99106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Gilmer, P. and Livingston, C.. An algebraic link concordance group for (p, 2p 1)-links in S2p+1. Preprint.Google Scholar
4Hacon, D.. Embeddings of Sp in S1 Sq in the metastable range. Topology 1 (1968), 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Hacon, D. and Mio, W.. Self-linking invariants of embeddings in the metastable range. Math. Ann. 279 (1987), 165168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hefliger, A.. Enlacement de sphres en codimension suprieure 2. Comment. Math. Helv. 41 (1966), 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hirschorn, P.. The stable homotopy type of knot complements. Illinois J. Math. 23 (1979), 128133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Jin, G. T.. On Kojima's -function of links. In Differential Topology (ed. Koschorke, U.), Lecture Notes in Math. vol. 1350 (Springer-Verlag, 1988), pp. 1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Kearton, C.. Obstructions to embedding and isotopy in the metastable range. Math. Ann. 243 (1979), 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Kervaire, M.. Les noeuds de dimensions superieures. Bull. Soc. Math. France 93 (1965), 225271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Kervaire, M.. An interpretation of G. Whitehead's generalization of H. Hopf's invariant. Ann. of Math. (2) 69 (1959), 345365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Kirk, P.. Link homotopy with one codimension two component. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 319 (1990), 662688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Kojima, S. and Yamasaki, M.. Some new invariants of links. Invent. Math. 54 (1979), 213228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Dimet, J. Le. Cobordisme d'Enlacements de Disques. Mem. Soc. Math. France no. 32 (1988).Google Scholar
15Levine, J.. Polynomial invariants of knots of codimension two. Ann. of Math. (2) 84 (1966), 537554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Levine, J.. Knot modules I. Trans. Amer. Soc. 229 (1977), 150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Levine, J.. An algebraic classification of some knots of codimension two. Comm. Math. Helv. 45 (1970), 185198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Levine, J.. Signature invariants of homology bordism with applications. Preprint.Google Scholar
19Levine, J., Mio, W. and Orr, K.. Links with vanishing homotopy invariant. Preprint.Google Scholar
20Zeeman, E.. Unknotting combinatorial balls. Ann. of Math. (2) 78 (1963), 501526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Bousfield, A.. Constructions of factorization systems in categories. J. Pure Appl. Alg. 9 (1977), 207220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar