Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T00:27:35.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Stokes constants for a cluster of transition points

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Nanny Fröman
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Uppsala, Thunergsvägen 3, S-752 38 Uppsala, Sweden
Per Olof Fröman
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Uppsala, Thunergsvägen 3, S-752 38 Uppsala, Sweden
Bengt Lundborg
Affiliation:
Institute of Theoretical Physics, University of Uppsala, Thunergsvägen 3, S-752 38 Uppsala, Sweden

Abstract

The connection problems associated with the one-dimensional Schrödinger equation in the presence of a general isolated cluster containing an unspecified number of complex transition points in unspecified positions can be studied by means of the phase-integral method developed by Fröman and Fröman. Any anti-Stokes line, i.e. any line in the complex z-plane on which the solutions behave as travelling waves with constant flow, must asymptotically (i.e. in the limit of large values of |z|) point in one of m +2 possible directions, which divide the region around the cluster into m +2 sectors, where m is the degree of the cluster. The tracing of these waves from an anti-Stokes line, bounding a sector, to an anti-Stokes line constituting the other boundary of the same sector is expressed by means of the Stokes constant for the sector in question. This paper examines the relation between these m + 2 Stokes constants in the general case when the transition points in the cluster may also be close-lying in the sense that it is impossible to treat them individually, when the solutions are traced. Under the assumption that the effective potential in the Schrodinger equation is a regular analytic function in a sufficiently large region containing the cluster, it is shown that the m + 2 Stokes constants are in general constrained by three algebraic relations, which are obtained for arbitrary m. The cases m = 1, 2, 3 and 4 are worked out in detail.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Campbell, J. A.. Computation of a class of functions useful in the phase-integral approximation. I. Results. J. Comp. Phys. 10 (1972), 308315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Dammert, Ö. and Fröman, P. O.. N. Fröman's phase-integral versus JWKB: Documentation of the advantages of the former in higher-order approximations. J. Math. Phys. 21 (1980), 16831687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fröman, N.. Detailed analysis of some properties of the JWKB-approximation. Ark. Fys. 31 (1966), 381408.Google Scholar
[4]Fröman, N.. Outline of a general theory for higher order approximations of the JWKB-type. Ark. Fys. 32 (1966), 541548.Google Scholar
[5]Fröman, N.. Connection formulas for certain higher order phase-integral approximations. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 61 (1970), 451464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.. JWKB Approximation, Contributions to the Theory (North-Holland, 1965).Google Scholar
[7]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.A direct method for modifying certain phase-integral approximations of arbitrary order. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 83 (1974), 103107.Google Scholar
[8]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.. On modifications of phase integral approximations of arbitrary order. Nuovo Cimento B 20 (1974), 121132.Google Scholar
[9]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.. Transmission through a real potential barrier treated by means of certain phase-integral approximations. Nuclear Phys. A 147 (1970), 606626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.. Arbitrary-order phase-integral approximation generated from an unspecified base function. In Méthodes semi-classiques en mécanique quantique (Publications de l'université de Nantes, Institut de Mathématiques et d'informatiques, 1984), pp. 4753.Google Scholar
[11]Fröman, N. and Fröman, P. O.. On the history of the so-called WKB-method from 1817 to 1926. In Semiclassical Descriptions of Atomic and Nuclear Collisions (North-Holland, 1985), pp. 17.Google Scholar
[12]Fröman, N., Fröman, P. O., Myhrman, U. and Paulsson, R.. On the quantal treatment of the double-well potential problem by means of certain phase-integral approximations. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 74 (1972), 314323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Heading, J.. An Introduction to Phase-Integral Methods (Methuen's Monographs on Physical Subjects, 1962).Google Scholar
[14]Heading, J.. Global phase-integral methods. Quart. J. Mech. Appl. Math. 30 (1977), 281302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Meyer, R. E.. Gradual reflection of short waves. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 29 (1975), 481492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Olver, F. W. J.. Connection formulas for second-order differential equations with multiple turning points. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 8 (1977), 127154.Google Scholar
[17]Olver, F. W. J.. Connection formulas for second-order differential equations having an arbitrary number of turning points of arbitrary multiplicities. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 8 (1977), 673700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Olver, F. W. J.. General connection formulae for Liouville-Green approximations in the complex plane. Philos. Trans. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A 289 (1978), 501548.Google Scholar
[19]Watson, G. N.. A Treatise on the Theory of Bessel Functions, 2nd ed. (Cambridge University Press, 1944).Google Scholar